Community Health Systems · Cedar Park, TX
3 of 5
CMS star rating
118
Beds
7,923
Inpatient discharges a year
$179.3M
Net patient revenue a year
34
In-network payers
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center is a 118-bed proprietary hospital in Cedar Park, TX, affiliated with Community Health Systems. Below you'll find publicly disclosed negotiated rates and facility details, including 34 in-network payers and 387 disclosed rate categories.
The 24 services Cedar Park Regional Medical Center most likely performs, ranked by likely volume and what it is paid. Each service names one insurer. * marks hidden insurer names; A, B and C rank the remaining rates from low to high and reset for each service.
Book a demo to see hidden insurer names, more payer rates, and hospital data, or start a free trial.
Childbirth · Inpatient
MS-DRG 807
$6,054 - $8,160
from 4 insurers · median $7,056
CMS lists this service as CPT 59400, the obstetrician's global fee. The hospital bills the delivery stay as MS-DRG 807, so these are facility case rates.
Hospital reports neonatal nursery services to CMS
Childbirth · Inpatient
MS-DRG 788
$9,464 - $11,413
from 4 insurers · median $10,037
CMS lists this service as CPT 59510, the obstetrician's global fee. The hospital bills the delivery stay as MS-DRG 788, so these are facility case rates.
Hospital reports neonatal nursery services to CMS
CT imaging
CPT 74177
$273 - $2,376
from 4 insurers · median $1,402
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Medicine & Surgery
CPT 47562
$4,874 - $9,340
from 4 insurers · median $5,683
51 Medicare claims in Level 1 Laparoscopy and Related Services (CMS 2024)
CT imaging
CPT 70450
$281 - $1,610
from 4 insurers · median $747
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Gynecology
CPT 58571
$4,132 - $8,413
from 3 insurers · median $6,419
27 Medicare claims in Level 2 Laparoscopy and Related Services (CMS 2024)
Cardiology and vascular testing
CPT 93306
$507 - $2,422
from 4 insurers · median $1,758
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
CT imaging
CPT 74176
$190 - $1,760
from 4 insurers · median $1,242
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Childbirth · Inpatient
MS-DRG 807
$6,054 - $8,160
from 4 insurers · median $7,056
CMS lists this service as CPT 59610, the obstetrician's global fee. The hospital bills the delivery stay as MS-DRG 807, so these are facility case rates.
Hospital reports neonatal nursery services to CMS
Mammography
CPT 77067
$327 - $889
from 4 insurers · median $367
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Digestive procedures
CPT 49650
$3,500 - $6,152
from 3 insurers · median $4,834
51 Medicare claims in Level 1 Laparoscopy and Related Services (CMS 2024)
Digestive procedures
CPT 43239
$872 - $2,994
from 3 insurers · median $2,045
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Digestive procedures
CPT 45380
$1,015 - $2,994
from 3 insurers · median $2,045
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Digestive procedures
CPT 45385
$1,076 - $2,856
from 3 insurers · median $2,045
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
CT imaging
CPT 71260
$468 - $1,610
from 4 insurers · median $1,077
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
MRI imaging
CPT 70553
$792 - $2,033
from 4 insurers · median $1,606
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
X-ray and bone density
CPT 71046
$28 - $313
from 4 insurers · median $250
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Orthopedics and pain
CPT 63030
$3,834 - $6,419
from 3 insurers · median $6,401
67 Medicare claims in Level 4 Musculoskeletal Procedures (CMS 2024)
MRI imaging
CPT 70551
$387 - $1,750
from 4 insurers · median $1,240
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Medicine & Surgery
CPT 55866
$3,834 - $8,365
from 3 insurers · median $6,419
27 Medicare claims in Level 2 Laparoscopy and Related Services (CMS 2024)
Nuclear imaging
CPT 78452
$457 - $5,055
from 4 insurers · median $2,450
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Orthopedics and pain
CPT 20610
$1,104 - $2,760
from 2 insurers · median $1,932
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Medicine & Surgery
CPT 29881
$2,929 - $3,500
from 3 insurers · median $3,249
35 Medicare claims in Level 3 Musculoskeletal Procedures (CMS 2024)
MRI imaging
CPT 72148
$400 - $1,750
from 4 insurers · median $1,034
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Median rate as a percent of Medicare across the outpatient services above, and how many services sit above or below the same insurer's median at nearby hospitals. * marks hidden insurer names. These table labels track the same insurers across services; the labels on each service card reset.
| Insurer | Services | Median % of Medicare | Above nearby | Below nearby |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insurer A* | 15 | 471% | 1 | 0 |
| Insurer B* | 24 | 352% | 2 | 8 |
| Insurer C* | 24 | 159% | 1 | 4 |
| Insurer D* | 23 | 101% | 9 | 2 |
How we chose these services: 6 appear in this hospital's own Medicare claims, 15 are common here based on CMS Medicare volume, and 3 are typical for the service lines it reports to CMS. Rates come from insurer and hospital price transparency files as of October 2026. Rates under a quarter of Medicare or over 20 times Medicare are left out as likely physician-fee rows or file errors. Book a demo to see all 300 CMS shoppable services for Cedar Park Regional Medical Center, or start a free trial.
Acceptance varies by plan and service. Confirm coverage with your insurer or the hospital's billing department.
Quality
3 of 5 stars
Doctors and services
Accredited by The Joint Commission
Finances
$179.3M net patient revenue
Ownership and leadership
Owned by Ascension Texas
The employer identification numbers (EINs) health plans and networks list for Cedar Park Regional Medical Center in the in-network rate files they publish, with the organization NPIs billed under each.
| Tax ID (EIN) | Plans and networks listing it | Organization NPIs |
|---|---|---|
| 20-3904667(multi-state) Cedar Park Health System LLC | 55Aetna, Cigna, United Healthcare (incl Optum, Rocky Mountain, Health Plan of Nevada, Sierra Health), Allied Benefit Systems, Ambetter and 50 more | 1376662296 Cedar Park Health System LLC |
Source: PayerPrice analysis of insurers' Transparency in Coverage in-network files. An EIN can cover several hospitals and clinics in a health system, and insurers sometimes list other organizations' NPIs under it.
1401 Medical Parkway, Cedar Park, TX 78613
(512) 528-7000
How Cedar Park Regional Medical Center compares with other US facilities on the measures CMS publishes, mostly from Medicare patients.
Overall star rating
3 of 5
Lower than 42% of US hospitals
Combines death rates, safety, readmissions, patient experience and timely care
Death rates
No different on 7 measures
0 better, 7 no different, 0 worse than the US rate
Deaths within 30 days, such as after a heart attack, pneumonia or stroke
Safety
Better on 1 of 6 measures
1 better, 5 no different, 0 worse than the US rate
Infections, surgical complications and other harm in the hospital
Readmissions
Worse on 1 of 8 measures
0 better, 7 no different, 1 worse than the US rate
Patients back in the hospital or ER soon after leaving
Patient survey rating
2 of 5
Lower than 81% of US hospitals
From the HCAHPS survey of recent inpatients
Would definitely recommend
61%
Lower than 84% of US hospitals
US median: 71%
Surveyed patients who would definitely recommend the hospital
Hospital-acquired condition penalty
Not penalized
Not among the worst-performing 25%
Medicare cuts payments 1% for the worst-performing 25% of hospitals on infections and injuries acquired in the hospital
Serious complications (PSI 90)
0.79
Lower than 94% of US hospitals
US median: 0.96
Risk-adjusted composite of complications such as bedsores, falls with hip fracture and blood clots after surgery; lower is better
Time in the ER before going home
142 min
Lower than 54% of US hospitals
US median: 148 min
Median minutes from arrival to leaving for ER patients who were sent home; lower is better
Sepsis care
65%
Lower than 50% of US hospitals
US median: 65%
Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock who got every step of the recommended early treatment; higher is better
| Measure | Result | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Overall star ratingCMS: Overall hospital quality star rating | 3 of 5 | |
| Death rates | No different on 7 measures | |
| Safety | Better on 1 of 6 measures | |
| Readmissions | Worse on 1 of 8 measures | |
| Patient survey ratingCMS: Summary star rating | 2 of 5 | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
| Would definitely recommendCMS: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital | 61% | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
| Hospital-acquired condition penaltyCMS: HAC Reduction Program payment reduction | Not penalized | 2026 |
| Serious complications (PSI 90)CMS: Patient safety and adverse events composite (PSI 90) | 0.79 | 2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 |
| Time in the ER before going homeCMS: Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, excluding patients transferred to another facility or psychiatric care/mental health patients. A lower number of minutes is better | 142 min | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
| Sepsis careCMS: Appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shock | 65% | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, released 2026-08-13. US comparisons rank this facility among every facility CMS reports for each measure. See Medicare Care Compare.
How Medicare adjusts Cedar Park Regional Medical Center's inpatient payments for its readmissions, quality and cost results.
-1.38% on Medicare payments
Readmissions penalty
Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program adjustment for excess readmissions, as estimated in the FY 2027 IPPS final rule.
+0.15% on Medicare payments
Value-based purchasing
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing bonus or reduction for quality and cost, as estimated in the FY 2027 IPPS final rule.
Source: CMS IPPS final rule Impact File (FY 2027).
Each result CMS publishes for Cedar Park Regional Medical Center, beside the US median and the average of TX hospitals. The rank says what share of US hospitals the result is better or worse than; counts and confidence limits are not ranked.
Risk-adjusted 30-day death rates and surgical complications; lower is better.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | TX average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients2023-04-01 to 2025-03-31 · 105 cases | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.144 | Better than 57% of US hospitals | |
| Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 1,256 cases | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.887 | Better than 49% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for heart attack patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 86 cases | 10.9 | 11.8 | 11.91 | Better than 78% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for CABG surgery patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 2.71 | |||
| Death rate for COPD patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 59 cases | 9.2 | 8.5 | 8.703 | Worse than 68% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for heart failure patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 119 cases | 9.3 | 11 | 10.52 | Better than 81% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for pneumonia patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 275 cases | 18.7 | 15.2 | 14.69 | Worse than 90% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for stroke patients2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 84 cases | 14.1 | 11.6 | 12.01 | Worse than 82% of US hospitals | |
| Pressure ulcer rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 1,718 cases | 0.35 | 0.51 | 0.52 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 73% of US hospitals |
| Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 32 cases | 159 | 173 | 166 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 75% of US hospitals |
| Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 2,363 cases | 0.19 | 0.2 | 0.2079 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 66% of US hospitals |
| In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 2,331 cases | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.2646 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 71% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 435 cases | 2.14 | 2.29 | 2.31 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 74% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 161 cases | 1.63 | 1.63 | 1.619 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 50% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative respiratory failure rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 180 cases | 6.77 | 8.88 | 10.06 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 87% of US hospitals |
| Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 456 cases | 2.97 | 3.4 | 3.337 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 82% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative sepsis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 163 cases | 4.67 | 5.105 | 5.234 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 77% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative wound dehiscence rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 112 cases | 1.73 | 1.72 | 1.771 | No Different Than the National Rate | Worse than 52% of US hospitals |
| Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 437 cases | 0.95 | 1.02 | 1.035 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 73% of US hospitals |
Unplanned returns to a hospital after a stay or an outpatient procedure; lower is better.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | TX average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital return days for heart attack patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 78 cases | 2.4 | 4.2 | 11.3 | Better than 53% of US hospitals | |
| Hospital return days for heart failure patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 124 cases | -5.7 | 1.25 | -1.323 | Better than 60% of US hospitals | |
| Hospital return days for pneumonia patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 287 cases | 26.8 | 3.85 | 2.422 | Worse than 79% of US hospitals | |
| Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | ||||
| Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)2022-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 286 cases | 15.6 | 12.9 | 13.1 | No Different Than the National Rate | Worse than 99% of US hospitals |
| Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 10.89 | Number of Cases Too Small | ||
| Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 5.287 | Number of Cases Too Small | ||
| Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 161 cases | 1.2 | 1 | 1.017 | No Different than expected | Worse than 89% of US hospitals |
| Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 81 cases | 14.2 | 14.4 | 14.48 | Better than 55% of US hospitals | |
| Rate of readmission for CABG2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 11.35 | |||
| Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 96 cases | 19.6 | 19.8 | 19.85 | Better than 58% of US hospitals | |
| Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 182 cases | 21.5 | 21.3 | 21.26 | Worse than 55% of US hospitals | |
| Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 105 cases | 4.8 | 5.8 | 5.89 | Better than 95% of US hospitals | |
| Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 403 cases | 19.4 | 17.2 | 17.32 | Worse than 96% of US hospitals |
Standardized infection ratios (1 is the US baseline) and the counts behind them; lower is better.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | TX average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.2089 | |||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 1.706 | |||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1,303 | 1,370 | 5,045 | ||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.848 | 0.9835 | 5.124 | ||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 0 | 2.481 | ||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.524 | |||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.1526 | No Different than National Benchmark | ||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 2.789 | 1.392 | 1.474 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1,644 | 1,799 | 4,197 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1.074 | 1.377 | 5.155 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 0 | 1.82 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 0.399 | 0.3671 | No Different than National Benchmark | The best result, shared by 24% of US hospitals |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.2931 | No Different than National Benchmark | ||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 2.063 | 2.135 | 2.124 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 50 | 61 | 131 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1.452 | 1.591 | 3.62 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 1 | 2.647 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| SSI - Colon Surgery2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 0.7155 | 0.6967 | No Different than National Benchmark | The best result, shared by 19% of US hospitals |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.3341 | |||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 3.281 | |||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 60 | 38 | 121 | ||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.499 | 0.328 | 1.047 | ||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 0 | 0.9659 | ||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.973 | |||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.2282 | |||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 2.053 | |||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 22,758 | 14,451 | 42,649 | ||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.951 | 0.567 | 2.717 | ||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1 | 0 | 1.635 | ||
| MRSA Bacteremia2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.6545 | |||
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.11 | 0.127 | 0.1195 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.837 | 0.747 | 0.935 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 22,099 | 13,646 | 38,870 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 11.52 | 5.683 | 20.56 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 4 | 2 | 4.894 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.347 | 0.279 | 0.2623 | Better than the National Benchmark | Worse than 60% of US hospitals |
How recent inpatients answered each survey question, with CMS's star rating per topic.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | TX average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Room was "always" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 72 | 73 | 75.97 | Worse than 53% of US hospitals | |
| Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 10 | 8 | 7.771 | Worse than 62% of US hospitals | |
| Room was "usually" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 18 | 18 | 16.26 | ||
| Cleanliness - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 86 | 87 | 87.82 | Worse than 53% of US hospitals | |
| Cleanliness - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 3 | 4 | 3.712 | Worse than 53% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "always" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 73 | 80 | 79.96 | Worse than 87% of US hospitals | |
| Nurse communication - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 89 | 91 | 90.97 | Worse than 79% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 6 | 4 | 4.535 | Worse than 76% of US hospitals | |
| Nurse communication - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 2 | 3 | 3.275 | Worse than 79% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 21 | 16 | 15.51 | ||
| Doctors "always" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 77 | 79 | 79.72 | Worse than 63% of US hospitals | |
| Doctor communication - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 89 | 91 | 90.24 | Worse than 71% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 7 | 5 | 5.687 | Worse than 72% of US hospitals | |
| Doctor communication - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 2 | 3 | 2.956 | Worse than 71% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 16 | 16 | 14.59 | ||
| Staff "always" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 55 | 61 | 62.66 | Worse than 83% of US hospitals | |
| Communication about medicines - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 72 | 77 | 76.88 | Worse than 84% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 26 | 19 | 19.26 | Worse than 88% of US hospitals | |
| Communication about medicines - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 2 | 3 | 2.672 | Worse than 53% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "usually" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 19 | 19 | 18.08 | ||
| Discharge information - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 79 | 86 | 84.56 | Worse than 93% of US hospitals | |
| No, staff "did not" give patients this information2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 21 | 13 | 13.98 | Worse than 94% of US hospitals | |
| Discharge information - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 2 | 3 | 3.07 | Worse than 82% of US hospitals | |
| Yes, staff "did" give patients this information2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 79 | 87 | 86.02 | Worse than 94% of US hospitals | |
| No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 24 | 14 | 16.2 | Worse than 94% of US hospitals | |
| Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 76 | 86 | 83.8 | Worse than 94% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 73 | 74 | 74.6 | Worse than 52% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 9 | 7 | 7.327 | Worse than 75% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 18 | 19 | 18.08 | ||
| Doctors "always" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 74 | 77 | 77.72 | Worse than 70% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 8 | 6 | 6.395 | Worse than 77% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 18 | 17 | 15.88 | ||
| Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 84 | 85 | 85.15 | Worse than 57% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 4 | 3 | 4.015 | Worse than 51% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 12 | 11 | 10.84 | ||
| Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 15 | 8 | 8.293 | Worse than 92% of US hospitals | |
| Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 22 | 20 | 18.19 | ||
| Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 63 | 72 | 73.52 | Worse than 82% of US hospitals | |
| Overall hospital rating - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 84 | 88 | 88.12 | Worse than 85% of US hospitals | |
| Overall hospital rating - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 2 | 3 | 3.319 | Worse than 78% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "always" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 68 | 74 | 74.97 | Worse than 86% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 13 | 9 | 9.68 | Worse than 80% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "usually" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 19 | 16 | 15.35 | ||
| Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 69 | 75 | 75.27 | Worse than 84% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 8 | 5 | 6.154 | Worse than 78% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 23 | 20 | 18.58 | ||
| Nurses "always" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 70 | 77 | 76.85 | Worse than 85% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 7 | 4 | 5 | Worse than 81% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 23 | 19 | 18.15 | ||
| Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 81 | 86 | 85.92 | Worse than 83% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 4 | 3 | 3.094 | Worse than 72% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 15 | 11 | 10.98 | ||
| "Always" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 52 | 59 | 65.6 | Worse than 74% of US hospitals | |
| "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 13 | 9 | 7.774 | Worse than 71% of US hospitals | |
| "Usually" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 35 | 31 | 26.63 | ||
| Quietness - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 79 | 82 | 84.26 | Worse than 66% of US hospitals | |
| Quietness - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 3 | 3 | 3.821 | Worse than 44% of US hospitals | |
| "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 12 | 5 | 6.017 | Worse than 93% of US hospitals | |
| "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 61 | 71 | 72.87 | Worse than 84% of US hospitals | |
| Recommend hospital - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 82 | 87 | 87.21 | Worse than 85% of US hospitals | |
| "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 27 | 23 | 21.12 | ||
| Recommend hospital - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 2 | 4 | 3.694 | Worse than 85% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "always" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 42 | 47 | 49.46 | Worse than 76% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 38 | 30 | 29.64 | Worse than 87% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "usually" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 20 | 22 | 20.89 | ||
| Summary star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 2 | 3 | 3.266 | Worse than 81% of US hospitals | |
| No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 17 | 12 | 12.55 | Worse than 86% of US hospitals | |
| Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 401 cases | 83 | 88 | 87.45 | Worse than 86% of US hospitals |
How often the hospital gave recommended care, and how fast.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | TX average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emergency department volume2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | medium | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Diagnosis Documented2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Risk Screening2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutrition Assessment2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutritional Care Plan2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Hospital Harm - Severe Hyperglycemia2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 6.38 | |||
| Hospital Harm - Severe Hypoglycemia2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 1,213 cases | 1 | 1 | 1.192 | Worse than 34% of US hospitals | |
| Hospital Harm - Opioid Related Adverse Events2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 0.2381 | |||
| Healthcare workers given influenza vaccination2024-10-01 to 2025-03-31 · 1,841 cases | 36 | 79 | 72.24 | Worse than 94% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time all patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, including psychiatric/mental health patients and patients who were transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 416 cases | 145 | 154 | 151 | Better than 57% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, excluding patients transferred to another facility or psychiatric care/mental health patients. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 385 cases | 142 | 148 | 146 | Better than 54% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time psychiatric/mental health patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 25 cases | 247 | 247 | 331 | Better than 50% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before being transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 279 | |||
| Left before being seen2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 32,329 cases | 1 | 1 | 1.372 | Better than 42% of US hospitals | |
| Head CT results2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 12 cases | 75 | 74 | 69.2 | Better than 51% of US hospitals | |
| Endoscopy/polyp surveillance: appropriate follow-up interval for normal colonoscopy in average risk patients2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 66 cases | 92 | 97 | 90.54 | Worse than 72% of US hospitals | |
| Improvement in Patient's Visual Function within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 99.5 | |||
| ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 41.08 | |||
| Safe Use of Opioids - Concurrent Prescribing2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 1,796 cases | 11 | 15 | 13.94 | Better than 77% of US hospitals | |
| Appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shock2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 165 cases | 65 | 65 | 66.54 | Worse than 50% of US hospitals | |
| Septic Shock 3-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 35 cases | 49 | 73 | 71.35 | Worse than 90% of US hospitals | |
| Septic Shock 6-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 16 cases | 94 | 88 | 89.11 | Better than 69% of US hospitals | |
| Severe Sepsis 3-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 165 cases | 87 | 82 | 82.14 | Better than 69% of US hospitals | |
| Severe Sepsis 6-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 112 cases | 90 | 94 | 92.38 | Worse than 72% of US hospitals | |
| Discharged on Antithrombotic Therapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 82 cases | 94 | 98 | 93.64 | Worse than 83% of US hospitals | |
| Anticoagulation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 71.67 | |||
| Antithrombotic Therapy by End of Hospital Day 22024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 66 cases | 98 | 94 | 92.48 | Better than 83% of US hospitals | |
| Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 78.56 | |||
| Intensive Care Unit Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 93.78 |
How often scans were ordered when they may not be needed; lower is better.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | TX average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdomen CT Use of Contrast Material2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | 0.8 | 5 | 7.719 | Better than 94% of US hospitals | |
| Breast Cancer Screening Recall Rates2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | 5.4 | 6.6 | 6.859 | Better than 65% of US hospitals |
Medicare spending around an inpatient stay compared with the US (1 is the US median).
| Measure | This hospital | US median | TX average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary)2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 1.034 | Better than 63% of US hospitals |
The scores Medicare uses to raise or lower inpatient payments; higher is better.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | TX average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VBP clinical outcomes domain scoreFY 2026 | 26 | 20 | 25.32 | Better than 61% of US hospitals | |
| VBP clinical outcomes weighted domain scoreFY 2026 | 6.5 | 5 | 6.413 | Better than 61% of US hospitals | |
| VBP efficiency and cost reduction domain scoreFY 2026 | 10 | 10 | 6.145 | Better than 43% of US hospitals | |
| VBP efficiency and cost reduction weighted domain scoreFY 2026 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.611 | Worse than 44% of US hospitals | |
| VBP person and community engagement domain scoreFY 2026 | 15 | 34 | 39.47 | Worse than 89% of US hospitals | |
| VBP person and community engagement weighted domain scoreFY 2026 | 3.75 | 8.75 | 10.13 | Worse than 89% of US hospitals | |
| VBP safety domain scoreFY 2026 | 74 | 40 | 48.35 | Better than 92% of US hospitals | |
| VBP safety weighted domain scoreFY 2026 | 18.5 | 10 | 12.26 | Better than 92% of US hospitals | |
| VBP total performance scoreFY 2026 | 31.25 | 29.5 | 29.94 | Better than 57% of US hospitals |
| By fiscal year | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VBP clinical outcomes domain score | 26 | 30 | 42.5 | 35 | 27.5 | 26 |
| VBP clinical outcomes weighted domain score | 6.5 | 7.5 | 10.63 | 8.75 | 6.875 | 6.5 |
| VBP efficiency and cost reduction domain score | 0 | Not Available | 0 | 20 | 0 | 10 |
| VBP efficiency and cost reduction weighted domain score | 0 | Not Available | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2.5 |
| VBP person and community engagement domain score | 27 | Not Available | Not Available | 9 | 10 | 15 |
| VBP person and community engagement weighted domain score | 6.75 | Not Available | Not Available | 2.25 | 2.5 | 3.75 |
| VBP safety domain score | 57.5 | Not Available | Not Available | 63.33 | 57.5 | 74 |
| VBP safety weighted domain score | 14.38 | Not Available | Not Available | 15.83 | 14.38 | 18.5 |
| VBP total performance score | 27.63 | Not Available | Not Available | 31.83 | 23.75 | 31.25 |
Excess readmission ratios by condition; above 1 means more readmissions than expected.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | TX average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| READM-30-AMI-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 94 cases | 1.112 | 0.9995 | 1.013 | Worse than 95% of US hospitals | |
| READM-30-CABG-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | N/A | 1.01 | |||
| READM-30-COPD-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 77 cases | 1.013 | 0.9969 | 0.999 | Worse than 64% of US hospitals | |
| READM-30-HF-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 122 cases | 1.062 | 0.9983 | 1 | Worse than 83% of US hospitals | |
| READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | 1.016 | 0.9916 | 1.006 | Worse than 57% of US hospitals | |
| READM-30-PN-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 302 cases | 1.093 | 0.9955 | 1.003 | Worse than 91% of US hospitals |
| By fiscal year | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| READM-30-AMI-HRRP | 1.009 | 0.9698 | 1.027 | 1.052 | 1.099 | 1.112 |
| READM-30-CABG-HRRP | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| READM-30-COPD-HRRP | 0.9964 | 1.004 | 1.025 | 1.012 | 1.036 | 1.013 |
| READM-30-HF-HRRP | 0.9289 | 0.9374 | 0.9721 | 1.005 | 1.025 | 1.062 |
| READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP | 1.155 | 0.9753 | 0.9888 | 0.9378 | N/A | 1.016 |
| READM-30-PN-HRRP | 1.021 | 0.9977 | 0.9622 | 0.953 | 0.9881 | 1.093 |
Infection ratios, the PSI 90 composite and the total score Medicare ranks hospitals on; lower is better.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | TX average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAUTI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0.462 | 0.489 | 0.4327 | Better than 53% of US hospitals | |
| CDI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0.33 | 0.346 | 0.2562 | Better than 52% of US hospitals | |
| CLABSI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0 | 0.559 | 0.5596 | The best result, shared by 14% of US hospitals | |
| HAC Reduction Program payment reductionFY 2026 | No | ||||
| MRSA standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0.633 | 0.6405 | 0.6118 | Better than 51% of US hospitals | |
| Patient safety and adverse events composite (PSI 90)2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | 0.7931 | 0.9628 | 0.9684 | Better than 94% of US hospitals | |
| SSI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0 | 0.7945 | 0.7483 | The best result, shared by 12% of US hospitals | |
| Total HAC scoreFY 2026 | -0.7917 | -0.0453 | -0.1734 | Better than 91% of US hospitals |
| By fiscal year | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAC Reduction Program payment reduction | No | No | N/A | No | No | No |
| Total HAC score | -0.028 | -0.0613 | 0 | -0.8627 | -0.743 | -0.7917 |
Source: CMS Care Compare hospital files, latest release 2026-09-30, with program results for earlier fiscal years from CMS's archived snapshots. US medians and ranks count every hospital CMS reports; state averages are plain means of the state's reporting hospitals, not CMS's patient-weighted state rates.
The Joint Commission (since 2025)
Accreditation
None
Medical school affiliation
Private (not for profit)
Ownership type
126
Medicare-certified beds
2008
In Medicare since
Source: CMS Provider of Services file, as reported by the hospital and state surveyors.
What Cedar Park Regional Medical Center reported to Medicare in its latest cost report, covering Dec 1, 2024 to Nov 30, 2025.
7,923
Inpatient discharges
Medicare 13%, Medicaid 2%
24,406
Inpatient days
57% of available bed days used
376
Employees (full-time equivalent)
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS) (report 834998). Figures cover the reporting period, which is not always 12 months, and are self-reported.
Inpatient days and discharges Cedar Park Regional Medical Center reported by payer. Medicare and Medicaid include their managed care plans, shown separately below.
| Medicare | Medicaid | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inpatient days | 4,122 | 336 | 19,948 | 24,406 |
| Discharges | 1,016 | 173 | 6,734 | 7,923 |
| Average length of stay | 4.1 days | 1.9 days | 3.0 days | 3.1 days |
| Average daily census | 11.3 | 0.9 | 54.7 | 66.9 |
5,729
Medicare Advantage days
1,249 discharges
2,117
Medicaid managed care days
1,039 discharges
1,362
Observation bed days
| Unit | Beds | Inpatient days | Medicare days | Occupancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adults & pediatrics | 89 | 7,946 | 3,732 | 24% |
| Intensive care unit | 21 | 13,245 | 390 | 173% |
| Other special care | 8 | 675 | 23% | |
| Nursery | 2,540 |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 834998, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Worksheet S-3 Part I.
What Cedar Park Regional Medical Center treats Medicare patients for most often, in 2024. 622 Medicare discharges in 23 published DRGs; 12% surgical; 72% in DRGs with complications (CC or MCC).
| Condition or procedure | Discharges | Average charges | Average Medicare payment | Estimated cost | DRG weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Septicemia or severe sepsis without MV >96 hours with MCCMS-DRG 871, medical | 147 | $82,884 | $10,635 | $10,360 | 1.98 |
| Respiratory infections and inflammations with MCCMS-DRG 177, medical | 40 | $69,796 | $9,858 | $8,725 | 1.70 |
| Heart failure and shock with MCCMS-DRG 291, medical | 38 | $48,226 | $7,180 | $6,028 | 1.28 |
| Major hip and knee joint replacement or reattachment of lower extremity without MCCMS-DRG 470, surgical | 36 | $134,786 | $10,442 | $16,848 | 1.88 |
| Kidney and urinary tract infections with MCCMS-DRG 689, medical | 36 | $60,456 | $6,717 | $7,557 | 1.17 |
| Simple pneumonia and pleurisy with MCCMS-DRG 193, medical | 34 | $67,076 | $7,505 | $8,385 | 1.33 |
| Septicemia or severe sepsis without MV >96 hours without MCCMS-DRG 872, medical | 33 | $58,556 | $5,645 | $7,320 | 1.03 |
| Kidney and urinary tract infections without MCCMS-DRG 690, medical | 32 | $42,706 | $4,148 | $5,338 | 0.81 |
| Infectious and parasitic diseases with o.r. procedures with MCCMS-DRG 853, surgical | 23 | $176,245 | $23,821 | $22,031 | 5.00 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with MCCMS-DRG 190, medical | 21 | $66,635 | $6,344 | $8,329 | 1.10 |
| Gastrointestinal hemorrhage with CCMS-DRG 378, medical | 19 | $68,014 | $5,296 | $8,502 | 0.98 |
| Miscellaneous disorders of nutrition, metabolism, fluids and electrolytes without MCCMS-DRG 641, medical | 19 | $36,355 | $3,745 | $4,544 | 0.78 |
| Esophagitis, gastroenteritis and miscellaneous digestive disorders without MCCMS-DRG 392, medical | 16 | $43,273 | $3,760 | $5,409 | 0.79 |
| Acute myocardial infarction, discharged alive with MCCMS-DRG 280, medical | 14 | $64,185 | $8,985 | $8,023 | 1.59 |
| Hip and femur procedures except major joint with CCMS-DRG 481, surgical | 14 | $135,205 | $12,466 | $16,901 | 2.07 |
| Miscellaneous disorders of nutrition, metabolism, fluids and electrolytes with MCCMS-DRG 640, medical | 14 | $61,878 | $7,461 | $7,735 | 1.32 |
| Pulmonary edema and respiratory failureMS-DRG 189, medical | 13 | $78,561 | $7,559 | $9,820 | 1.23 |
| Cellulitis without MCCMS-DRG 603, medical | 13 | $44,353 | $4,516 | $5,544 | 0.88 |
| Renal failure with CCMS-DRG 683, medical | 13 | $45,489 | $4,159 | $5,686 | 0.90 |
| Intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral infarction with CC or tpa in 24 hoursMS-DRG 065, medical | 12 | $59,540 | $5,492 | $7,442 | 1.02 |
See all 23 Medicare inpatient DRGs at Cedar Park Regional Medical Center
Source: CMS Medicare Inpatient Hospitals by Provider and Service (2024 data, released 2026-04-10), traditional Medicare only; CMS omits DRGs with fewer than 11 discharges. Estimated cost is average charges times the hospital's Medicare cost-to-charge ratio from the IPPS Impact File. Weights are the MS-DRG relative weights for the same year.
The comprehensive outpatient service groups (APCs) Cedar Park Regional Medical Center billed Medicare for most in 2024: 693 services in all.
| Service group | Services | Patients | Average charges | Average Medicare payment | US average payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive Observation ServicesAPC 8011 | 140 | 136 | $33,709 | $1,896 | $2,090 |
| Level 2 Upper GI ProceduresAPC 5302 | 91 | 73 | $17,365 | $1,297 | $1,445 |
| Level 1 Endovascular ProceduresAPC 5191 | 78 | 77 | $39,249 | $2,027 | $2,208 |
| Level 4 Musculoskeletal ProceduresAPC 5114 | 67 | 61 | $99,697 | $4,643 | $5,339 |
| Level 1 Laparoscopy and Related ServicesAPC 5361 | 51 | 50 | $50,765 | $3,998 | $4,358 |
| Level 3 Musculoskeletal ProceduresAPC 5113 | 35 | 34 | $43,847 | $2,226 | $2,373 |
| Level 2 Excision/ Biopsy/ Incision and DrainageAPC 5072 | 33 | 30 | $13,339 | $1,106 | $1,220 |
| Level 2 Laparoscopy and Related ServicesAPC 5362 | 27 | 27 | $111,030 | $7,415 | $8,164 |
| Level 5 Musculoskeletal ProceduresAPC 5115 | 26 | 26 | $161,506 | $9,164 | $10,772 |
| Level 2 Musculoskeletal ProceduresAPC 5112 | 21 | 20 | $15,880 | $1,118 | $1,196 |
See all 18 Medicare outpatient services at Cedar Park Regional Medical Center
Source: CMS Medicare Outpatient Hospitals by Provider and Service (2024 data, released 2026-06-24), comprehensive APCs for traditional Medicare; CMS omits services with fewer than 11 claims. The US average weights every hospital by its services.
ZIP codes with the most Medicare inpatient stays at Cedar Park Regional Medical Center in 2025. Market share is this hospital's part of every hospital's Medicare stays from the ZIP code. Its published Medicare stays went from 1,575 in 2020 to 2,000 in 2025.
| ZIP code | Stays | Of this hospital's stays | Days | Charges | Market share | Share in 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78641 | 629 | 31% | 2,635 | $54.2M | 28% | 31% |
| 78613 | 552 | 28% | 2,342 | $48.8M | 26% | 28% |
| 78645 | 200 | 10% | 799 | $17.8M | 28% | 30% |
| 78642 | 182 | 9% | 951 | $20.5M | 23% | 25% |
| 78605 | 55 | 3% | 210 | $5M | 19% | 21% |
| 78611 | 46 | 2% | 170 | $3.9M | 5% | 2% |
| 78681 | 44 | 2% | 178 | $4M | 3% | 3% |
| 78717 | 38 | 2% | 184 | $3.4M | 10% | 7% |
| 78628 | 37 | 2% | 108 | $2.9M | 2% | 2% |
| 78654 | 29 | 1% | 103 | $2.5M | 2% | 2% |
| 78750 | 28 | 1% | 148 | $2.8M | 4% | 3% |
| 78633 | 25 | 1% | 96 | $2.3M | 1% | 1% |
| 78729 | 24 | 1% | 79 | $1.7M | 4% | 3% |
| 78630 | 20 | 1% | 104 | $1.9M | 63% | 51% |
| 78726 | 20 | 1% | 104 | $1.6M | 11% | 12% |
| 78759 | 17 | 1% | 64 | $1.2M | 1% | |
| 76542 | 15 | 1% | 49 | $1.1M | 1% | |
| 76550 | 15 | 1% | 81 | $1.5M | 2% | |
| 78626 | 13 | 1% | 46 | $1.7M | 1% | |
| 78646 | 11 | 1% | 42 | $1M | 100% | 59% |
Source: CMS Hospital Service Area file. Shares are of the 2,000 stays from ZIP codes CMS publishes; it omits ZIP codes with fewer than 11 stays, so market shares count published stays only.
Staff by profession and the rooms and units Cedar Park Regional Medical Center reported at its latest Medicare certification survey (2025). Counts are people, not full-time equivalents.
6
Operating rooms
4
Endoscopy rooms
2
Cardiac catheterization rooms
9
Off-site locations
1
Off-site emergency departments
1
Physician assistants
11
Pharmacists
9
Respiratory therapists
6
Physical therapists
1
Occupational therapists
5
Speech pathologists and audiologists
6
Radiology technicians
2
Nuclear medicine technicians
6
Laboratory technicians
19
Medical technologists
4
Dietitians
1
Social workers
270
Other personnel
Source: CMS Provider of Services file.
337 clinicians who bill Medicare list Cedar Park Regional Medical Center as a hospital affiliation. Showing 24 of them. Book a demo to see the commercial rates insurers publish for them, or start a free trial.
Brian Shimkus, MD
Medical Oncology Physician
NPI 1730164591
See commercial rates for Brian Shimkus, MDBeth Hellerstedt, M.D.
Hematology & Oncology Physician
NPI 1215975487
See commercial rates for Beth Hellerstedt, M.D.Robert Koval, MD
Rheumatology Physician
NPI 1659427334
See commercial rates for Robert Koval, MDF. Pfeifer, MD
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1972507598
See commercial rates for F. Pfeifer, MDAndrew Shaw, M.D.
Hematology & Oncology Physician
NPI 1558686915
See commercial rates for Andrew Shaw, M.D.Courtney Yau, M.D.
Medical Oncology Physician
NPI 1487812590
See commercial rates for Courtney Yau, M.D.Hareesha Vemuganti, M.D
Hematology & Oncology Physician
NPI 1861623340
See commercial rates for Hareesha Vemuganti, M.DVivian Cline, MD
Medical Oncology Physician
NPI 1003870759
See commercial rates for Vivian Cline, MDMeshaal Nadeem, D.O
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1669904637
See commercial rates for Meshaal Nadeem, D.OBooth Aldred, M.D.
Neuroradiology Physician
NPI 1972823599
See commercial rates for Booth Aldred, M.D.Krishna Patel, MD
Medical Oncology Physician
NPI 1619263183
See commercial rates for Krishna Patel, MDStanislav Spiridonov, M.D.
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1295021616
See commercial rates for Stanislav Spiridonov, M.D.Stephen Price, M.D.
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1316262330
See commercial rates for Stephen Price, M.D.Ashleigh Porter
Hematology & Oncology Physician
NPI 1326435371
See commercial rates for Ashleigh PorterStephen Agatston, MD
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1518966043
See commercial rates for Stephen Agatston, MDRajeev Shah, MD
Neuroradiology Physician
NPI 1851351704
See commercial rates for Rajeev Shah, MDMike Nguyen, MD
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1699006304
See commercial rates for Mike Nguyen, MDSeyed Abedi, M.D.,PH.D.
Hematology & Oncology Physician
NPI 1033567409
See commercial rates for Seyed Abedi, M.D.,PH.D.Sarah Avery, M.D.
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1770585937
See commercial rates for Sarah Avery, M.D.Patricia Gallagher, M.D.
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1750376265
See commercial rates for Patricia Gallagher, M.D.Nabeel Farhataziz, M.D.
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1609884089
See commercial rates for Nabeel Farhataziz, M.D.Travis Cox, M.D.
Hematology & Oncology Physician
NPI 1982090981
See commercial rates for Travis Cox, M.D.Elizabeth Peckham, D.O.
Neurology Physician
NPI 1154533743
See commercial rates for Elizabeth Peckham, D.O.Michael Herman, M.D.
Radiation Oncology Physician
NPI 1134419955
See commercial rates for Michael Herman, M.D.Source: CMS Doctors and Clinicians facility affiliations, released 2026-10-15, with names and specialties from NPPES. Affiliation means the clinician bills Medicare for care at this hospital; it is not employment.
Revenue, expenses and income Cedar Park Regional Medical Center reported to Medicare for Dec 1, 2024 to Nov 30, 2025. Percentages are of net patient revenue.
| Line | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Gross patient revenue (charges) | $1.2B | 642.1% |
| Inpatient | $492.7M | 274.7% |
| Outpatient | $658.9M | 367.4% |
| Contractual allowances and discounts | -$972.2M | -542.1% |
| Net patient revenue | $179.3M | 100.0% |
| Operating expenses | -$151.3M | -84.4% |
| Operating income from patient care | $28M | 15.6% |
| Other income | $9.2M | 5.2% |
| Net income | $37.3M | 20.8% |
| Line | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional Medicare | $168.1M | 14.9% |
| Medicaid (including managed care) | $33.8M | 3.0% |
| Other payers and self-pay | $924.7M | 82.1% |
| Total charges | $1.1B | 100.0% |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 834998, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Traditional Medicare is the program charges on Worksheets D-3 and D Part V; Medicaid is from Worksheet S-10.
Computed from Cedar Park Regional Medical Center's latest cost report.
15.6%
Operating margin
Operating income from patient care / net patient revenue
19.8%
Total margin
Net income / net patient revenue plus other income
21.4%
EBITDAR margin
Net income before interest, depreciation and leases (Worksheet A-7), / total revenue
38% of expenses
Personnel costs
Salaries, direct-care contract labor and core wage-related costs / operating expenses
$46.21
Average hourly wage
Adjusted salaries / paid hours (Worksheet S-3 Part II)
6.6%
Return on assets
Net income for a year / total assets
7.6%
Return on equity
Net income for a year / fund balance
0.60
Current ratio
Current assets / current liabilities
2.96
Quick ratio
Cash, temporary investments and net receivables / current liabilities
0 days
Days cash on hand
Cash and temporary investments / daily operating expenses excluding depreciation
424 days
Days in patient receivables
Net patient receivables / daily net patient revenue
173 days
Average payment period
Current liabilities / daily operating expenses excluding depreciation
0.33
Asset turnover
Total revenue for a year / total assets
0.9 years
Average age of plant
Accumulated depreciation / depreciation for a year
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 834998, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
What Cedar Park Regional Medical Center owned and owed at the end of its reporting period (Nov 2025), across all fund types: $566.6M in total assets and a $488.3M fund balance.
| Line | Amount | Of total assets |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and temporary investments | $42,171 | 0.0% |
| Patient receivables, net | $208.3M | 36.8% |
| Inventory | $3.4M | 0.6% |
| Total current assets | $42.3M | 7.5% |
| Property and equipment, net of depreciation | $166.7M | 29.4% |
| Investments and other assets | $357.6M | 63.1% |
| Total assets | $566.6M | 100.0% |
| Current liabilities | $70.3M | 12.4% |
| Total liabilities | $78.3M | 13.8% |
| Fund balance (net assets) | $488.3M | 86.2% |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 834998, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
Care Cedar Park Regional Medical Center provided without full payment, as reported on Worksheet S-10 of its cost report.
$4.4M
Cost of charity care
Care for patients approved for charity care and uninsured discounts, at cost
$25.5M
Bad debt
Patient bills written off as uncollectible, at charges
-$3.9M
Medicaid shortfall
Cost of Medicaid patients (charges times the cost-to-charge ratio) minus Medicaid payments; negative means a surplus
-$20,333
CHIP shortfall
Cost of stand-alone CHIP patients minus CHIP payments
$7M
Total unreimbursed and uncompensated care
4.6% of operating expenses
Medicaid, CHIP and indigent care shortfalls plus charity care and the cost of bad debt (Worksheet S-10 line 31)
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 834998, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center's full-year cost reports, by fiscal year end. Reports shorter than ten months are left out.
| Fiscal year ending | Nov 2020 | Nov 2021 | Nov 2022 | Nov 2023 | Nov 2024 | Nov 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $138.2M | $169M | $172.7M | $180.9M | $197.6M | $179.3M |
| Operating expenses | $126.4M | $146.3M | $155.2M | $157.9M | $167.2M | $151.3M |
| Operating margin | 8.5% | 13.4% | 10.1% | 12.7% | 15.4% | 15.6% |
| Net income | $16.2M | $27M | $19.2M | $24.8M | $31.5M | $37.3M |
| Total assets | $144.1M | $154.4M | $149.6M | $164.4M | $164.1M | $566.6M |
| Discharges | 5,206 | 6,488 | 6,302 | 6,476 | 6,918 | 7,923 |
| Inpatient days | 20,065 | 26,231 | 24,505 | 24,617 | 26,248 | 24,406 |
| Medicare Advantage days | 2,895 | 4,227 | 4,401 | 4,794 | 5,350 | 5,729 |
| Beds | 100 | 126 | 115 | 112 | 110 | 118 |
| Employees (FTE) | 570 | 616 | 622 | 625 | 792 | 376 |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 834998, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
Each cost center Cedar Park Regional Medical Center reports, largest first. Total cost includes its share of overhead; the cost-to-charge ratio is total cost / charges.
| Department | Salaries | Total cost | Charges | Cost-to-charge | Square feet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating room | $3.7M | $16.3M | $148.5M | 0.11 | 27,364 |
| Medical supplies charged to patient | $484,853 | $8.9M | $18.3M | 0.49 | |
| Emergency | $4.1M | $8.8M | $121.1M | 0.07 | 12,069 |
| Drugs charged to patients | $1.7M | $8.5M | $75M | 0.11 | 7,280 |
| Laboratory | $1.6M | $8.4M | $150.3M | 0.06 | 2,773 |
| Radiology-diagnostic | $2.9M | $7.8M | $51.8M | 0.15 | 7,637 |
| Cardiac catheterization | $1.1M | $4M | $34.1M | 0.12 | 12,918 |
| Wound care | $799,886 | $2.6M | $29.3M | 0.09 | 3,054 |
| Observation beds (non-distinct part | $2.4M | $6.1M | 0.39 | ||
| Physical therapy | $1.2M | $2.4M | $15.6M | 0.15 | 1,041 |
| Recovery room | $1M | $2.3M | $24.6M | 0.09 | 3,585 |
| Impl. dev. charged to patients | $1.9M | $79.4M | 0.02 | ||
| Respiratory therapy | $902,573 | $1.8M | $18.7M | 0.09 | 2,132 |
| Ct scan | $526,958 | $1.5M | $141.7M | 0.01 | 618 |
| Radioisotope | $160,150 | $614,822 | $12.5M | 0.05 | 510 |
| Whole blood & packed red blood cell | $581,131 | $3.3M | 0.17 | 255 | |
| Electroencephalography | $178,302 | $579,386 | $955,841 | 0.61 | |
| Electrocardiology | $292,076 | $541,033 | $11M | 0.05 | 138 |
| Apheresis/dialysis | $141,871 | $491,490 | $960,842 | 0.51 | 1,824 |
| Mri | $189,731 | $402,947 | $14.9M | 0.03 | 794 |
| Anesthesiology | $79,668 | $339,270 | $46.3M | 0.01 | 502 |
| Occupational therapy | $135,352 | $228,125 | $2.6M | 0.09 | |
| Renal dialysis | $128,946 | $220,215 | $796,712 | 0.28 | |
| Speech pathology | $68,501 | $116,584 | $908,647 | 0.13 |
| Department | Salaries | Total cost | Charges | Cost-to-charge | Square feet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adults & pediatrics | $4.7M | $16.3M | $40.4M | 0.40 | 68,575 |
| Intensive care unit | $7.7M | $15.3M | $63.2M | 0.24 | 9,403 |
| Neonatal intensive care unit | $945,811 | $2.2M | $8.9M | 0.25 | 5,968 |
| Nursery | $398,300 | $976,554 | $5.3M | 0.18 | 1,055 |
| Department | Salaries | Direct cost | Paid hours | Average hourly wage | Square feet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative & general | $4.1M | $35.8M | 95,232 | $43.15 | 13,441 |
| Employee benefits department | $522,811 | $5.3M | 4,437 | $56.99 | 1,138 |
| Operation of plant | $272,865 | $3.6M | 16,363 | $16.68 | 92,981 |
| Housekeeping | $656,246 | $2.1M | 27,046 | $24.26 | 1,259 |
| Cap rel costs-mvble equip | $1.8M | ||||
| Cafeteria | $1.7M | 18,783 | $29.57 | 1,917 | |
| Nursing administration | $1.3M | $1.4M | 22,943 | $54.84 | 3,257 |
| Cap rel costs-bldg & fixt | $1.4M | 294,769 | |||
| Social service | $476,183 | $761,198 | 8,743 | $54.46 | 1,380 |
| Dietary | $707,400 | $563,860 | 5,138 | $29.57 | 6,218 |
| Medical records & library | $320,650 | $457,728 | 8,597 | $37.30 | 2,794 |
| Laundry & linen service | $401,301 | 889 |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 834998, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Worksheets A, B-1, C Part I and S-3 Part II.
The factors Medicare uses to set what it pays Cedar Park Regional Medical Center for an inpatient stay.
1.53
Case mix index
Higher than 31% of hospitals paid under Medicare IPPS
Average Medicare DRG weight of its inpatient cases (FY 2027); higher means more complex, costlier care.
No Medicare-funded residents
Teaching status
Medicare-funded interns and residents per bed (FY 2027).
22.3%
Low-income patient share
Disproportionate share percentage: Medicaid and SSI patient days CMS uses for safety-net payments (FY 2027).
997
Medicare inpatient stays
Medicare claims CMS based FY 2027 payment rates on.
Urban (metro area)
Location type
Geographic area CMS assigns before any wage index reclassification (FY 2027).
| IPPS fiscal year | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 | FY 2027 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case mix index | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.56 | 1.61 | 1.58 | 1.61 | 1.53 |
| Wage index | 0.934 | 0.930 | 0.928 | 0.898 | 0.949 | 0.972 | 0.991 |
| Readmissions adjustment | -1.47% | -1.27% | -0.07% | -0.14% | -0.22% | -0.42% | -1.38% |
| Value-based purchasing adjustment | +0.04% | -0.23% | -0.23% | +0.41% | +1.02% | +0.13% | +0.15% |
| Medicare inpatient stays | 1,351 | 1,351 | 1,283 | 1,153 | 1,167 | 1,222 | 997 |
Source: CMS IPPS final rule Impact File (FY 2027).
Organizations Cedar Park Regional Medical Center reports to Medicare as owners or with operational control. 1 individuals also hold ownership interests; they are not listed here.
Ascension Texas
5% or greater direct ownership interest, 99%, since 2025
Cp Hospital Gp LLC
5% or greater direct ownership interest, 1%, since 2007
Ascension Health
Operational/managerial control, since 2025
Ascension Seton
Operational/managerial control, since 2025
Cedar Park Health System LLC
Operational/managerial control, since 2025
Cp Hospital Gp LLC
General partnership interest, since 2007
Cp Hospital Gp LLC
Operational/managerial control, since 2007
Sources: CMS Hospital All Owners.
The officers and board members on Cedar Park Regional Medical Center's Medicare enrollment and on the IRS Form 990 filed under its tax ID.
Source: CMS Hospital All Owners (PECOS), the people the hospital lists on its Medicare enrollment; the first 6 of 8 are shown.
About Cedar Park Regional Medical Center's rates and hospital price transparency.
For MRI brain before and after contrast (CPT 70553), published negotiated rates at Cedar Park Regional Medical Center range from $792 to $2,033 across 4 insurers. Aetna's rate is $2,033. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $1,584. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
For CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast (CPT 74177), published negotiated rates at Cedar Park Regional Medical Center range from $273 to $2,376 across 4 insurers. Aetna's rate is $2,376. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $1,451. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
For Colonoscopy with biopsy (CPT 45380), published negotiated rates at Cedar Park Regional Medical Center range from $1,015 to $2,994 across 3 insurers. Blue Cross Blue Shield's rate is $1,015. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $2,111. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
For Vaginal delivery, hospital stay (MS-DRG 807), published negotiated rates at Cedar Park Regional Medical Center range from $6,054 to $8,160 across 4 insurers. Cigna's rate is $8,160. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
For Screening mammography, bilateral (CPT 77067), published negotiated rates at Cedar Park Regional Medical Center range from $327 to $889 across 4 insurers. Aetna's rate is $889. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $339. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center has a CMS overall hospital star rating of 3 out of 5 on Medicare Care Compare (CMS data released 2026-08-13). That is lower than 42% of US hospitals.
CMS reports no Medicare-funded interns or residents at Cedar Park Regional Medical Center for fiscal year 2027.
Yes. Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, Medicare cuts Cedar Park Regional Medical Center's base inpatient payments by an estimated 1.38% in fiscal year 2027 for more readmissions than expected.
In 2024, the most common were septicemia or severe sepsis without mv >96 hours with mcc (147 discharges), respiratory infections and inflammations with mcc (40 discharges), heart failure and shock with mcc (38 discharges).
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center's Medicare case mix index is 1.53 for fiscal year 2027, higher than 31% of hospitals paid under the inpatient prospective payment system.
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center reported 7,923 inpatient discharges and 24,406 inpatient days from Dec 1, 2024 to Nov 30, 2025.
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center reported 376 full-time-equivalent employees on payroll from Dec 1, 2024 to Nov 30, 2025.
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center reported $179.3M in net patient revenue on $1.2B of gross charges for Dec 1, 2024 to Nov 30, 2025, an operating margin of 15.6%, and net income of $37.3M.
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center reported $7M of unreimbursed and uncompensated care for Dec 1, 2024 to Nov 30, 2025, including $4.4M of charity care at cost.
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center's Medicare enrollment lists James Ramzey Youssef as President, CEO, Ascension Texas since 2025.
Insurers' price transparency files list Cedar Park Regional Medical Center under employer identification number 20-3904667 ((multi-state) Cedar Park Health System LLC). 55 health plans and networks list 20-3904667 for it.
337 clinicians who bill Medicare list Cedar Park Regional Medical Center as a hospital affiliation in CMS's Doctors and Clinicians data. The largest groups are anesthesiology physician (46), certified registered nurse anesthetist (45), internal medicine physician (19).
Yes. CMS's Provider of Services file lists The Joint Commission as the accrediting organization for Cedar Park Regional Medical Center, effective 2025.
In its Medicare enrollment, Cedar Park Regional Medical Center reports Ascension Texas as 5% or greater direct ownership interest (99%).
CMS lists 35 services at Cedar Park Regional Medical Center, including Acute Renal Dialysis, Anesthesia, Cardiac Catheterization Lab, CARF Inpatient Rehabilitation (Commission On Accreditation Of Rehabilitation Facilities Inpatient Rehabilitation), Clinical Laboratory, Coronary Care Unit.
In CMS's 2025 Hospital Service Area file, the most Medicare inpatient stays at Cedar Park Regional Medical Center came from ZIP codes 78641 (629), 78613 (552), 78645 (200).
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center has 118 beds, including its psychiatric, rehabilitation and other subprovider units, in its latest Medicare cost report. 126 are Medicare-certified beds in CMS's Provider of Services file. Facility type: Short Term Acute Care Hospital.
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center is located at 1401 Medical Parkway, Cedar Park, TX 78613. Its main phone number is (512) 528-7000.
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center's CMS Certification Number (CCN), also called its Medicare provider number, is 670043.
The National Provider Identifier (NPI) on file for Cedar Park Regional Medical Center is 1376662296.
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center is affiliated with Community Health Systems.
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center lists 34 in-network payers, including Aetna, Ambetter, Ameri Health, Aspirus Health Plan, and is Medicare-certified. Insurance acceptance may vary by plan, so confirm coverage with your insurer or the hospital's billing department.
387 disclosed rate categories. Each shows the payer, category, code type and group with its code range, and contract type, along with how the rate compares with the state average.
Under 45 CFR Part 180, every US hospital must publish a machine-readable file of its standard charges, including gross charges, discounted cash prices and payer-specific negotiated rates, in the CMS template format. PayerPrice can help hospitals publish and maintain these files.
A chargemaster (charge description master, or CDM) is a hospital's master list of billable items, with codes, descriptions and gross charges. A chargemaster review looks at those lines for accuracy and pricing. PayerPrice can help hospitals review their chargemaster; contact us to discuss your needs.
For hospital finance and compliance teams
The data on this page comes from the files hospitals and payers publish. We help hospitals publish theirs correctly, and take a fresh look at their chargemaster.
We turn your chargemaster and payer contracts into the CMS template file, then keep it current as rates change.
{
"description": "MRI of brain (no contrast)",
"code_information": [
{ "code": "611", "type": "RC" },
{ "code": "70551", "type": "CPT" }
],
"standard_charges": [{
"setting": "outpatient",
"minimum": 250,
"maximum": 400,
"gross_charge": 1200,
"discounted_cash": 1080,
"payers_information": [
{
"payer_name": "Platform Health Insurance",
"plan_name": "PPO",
"methodology": "fee schedule",
"standard_charge_dollar": 400
},
{
"payer_name": "Region Health Insurance",
"plan_name": "HMO",
"methodology": "fee schedule",
"standard_charge_dollar": 250
}
]
}]
}Your chargemaster sets the gross charge on every claim, and many payer contracts base payment on it through percent-of-charge, lesser-of and stop-loss terms. We audit it line by line and show how your charges and negotiated rates compare with peer hospitals before your next negotiation.
What a review covers