Adventist Health · Reedley, CA
Not rated by CMS
CMS star rating
49
Beds
1,410
Inpatient discharges a year
$221.6M
Net patient revenue a year
31
In-network payers
Adventist Health Reedley is a 49-bed voluntary non-profit - private hospital in Reedley, CA, affiliated with Adventist Health. Below you'll find publicly disclosed negotiated rates and facility details, including 31 in-network payers and 253 disclosed rate categories.
The 24 services Adventist Health Reedley most likely performs, ranked by likely volume and what it is paid. Each service names one insurer. * marks hidden insurer names; A, B and C rank the remaining rates from low to high and reset for each service.
Book a demo to see hidden insurer names, more payer rates, and hospital data, or start a free trial.
Digestive procedures
CPT 43239
$304 - $8,450
from 4 insurers · median $6,555
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Digestive procedures
CPT 45380
$440 - $7,535
from 4 insurers · median $5,989
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Digestive procedures
CPT 45385
$556 - $7,535
from 4 insurers · median $5,716
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Medicine & Surgery
CPT 47562
$8,828 - $41,430
from 3 insurers · median $27,723
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Digestive procedures
CPT 45378
$405 - $7,535
from 4 insurers · median $5,967
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
CT imaging
CPT 70450
$77 - $2,043
from 4 insurers · median $668
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Medicine & Surgery
CPT 66984
$743 - $21,678
from 4 insurers · median $11,595
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Gynecology
CPT 58571
$9,299 - $41,430
from 3 insurers · median $18,258
Typical for a hospital with this service line
CT imaging
CPT 74177
$161 - $1,154
from 3 insurers · median $420
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
CT imaging
CPT 74176
$159 - $2,062
from 4 insurers · median $721
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
MRI imaging
CPT 70553
$208 - $3,004
from 4 insurers · median $1,872
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Medicine & Surgery
CPT 42820
$6,386 - $21,678
from 3 insurers · median $13,286
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Cardiology and vascular testing
CPT 93306
$381 - $1,930
from 4 insurers · median $642
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Gynecology
CPT 58661
$8,589 - $39,599
from 3 insurers · median $14,907
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Ear, nose and throat
CPT 69436
$6,358 - $8,266
from 3 insurers · median $7,041
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Gynecology
CPT 58558
$5,702 - $22,730
from 3 insurers · median $8,450
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Medicine & Surgery
CPT 64483
$250 - $7,264
from 4 insurers · median $5,389
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Medicine & Surgery
CPT 62322 · CPT 62323
$4,453 - $7,264
from 3 insurers · median $6,328
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Urology
CPT 50590
$1,285 - $39,599
from 4 insurers · median $15,877
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Gynecology
CPT 58662
$8,693 - $39,599
from 3 insurers · median $13,068
Typical for a hospital with this service line
MRI imaging
CPT 74183
$206 - $3,074
from 4 insurers · median $1,790
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Ear, nose and throat
CPT 30520
$1,545 - $21,678
from 4 insurers · median $11,852
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Urology
CPT 52000
$4,045 - $7,746
from 3 insurers · median $6,621
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Mammography
CPT 77067
$42 - $220
from 4 insurers · median $125
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Median rate as a percent of Medicare across the outpatient services above, and how many services sit above or below the same insurer's median at nearby hospitals. * marks hidden insurer names. These table labels track the same insurers across services; the labels on each service card reset.
| Insurer | Services | Median % of Medicare | Above nearby | Below nearby |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insurer A* | 24 | 628% | 17 | 3 |
| Insurer B* | 24 | 362% | 15 | 8 |
| Insurer C* | 24 | 350% | 16 | 7 |
| Insurer D* | 14 | 44% | 4 | 1 |
How we chose these services: 0 appear in this hospital's own Medicare claims, 13 are common here based on CMS Medicare volume, and 11 are typical for the service lines it reports to CMS. Rates come from insurer and hospital price transparency files as of October 2026. Rates under a quarter of Medicare or over 20 times Medicare are left out as likely physician-fee rows or file errors. Book a demo to see all 300 CMS shoppable services for Adventist Health Reedley, or start a free trial.
Acceptance varies by plan and service. Confirm coverage with your insurer or the hospital's billing department.
Quality
Not rated by CMS
Doctors and services
Accredited by The Joint Commission
Finances
$221.6M net patient revenue
Ownership and leadership
Private (not for profit)
The employer identification numbers (EINs) health plans and networks list for Adventist Health Reedley in the in-network rate files they publish, with the organization NPIs billed under each.
| Tax ID (EIN) | Plans and networks listing it | Organization NPIs |
|---|---|---|
| 45-3220509Reedley Community Hospital | 45Aetna, Cigna, United Healthcare (incl Optum, Rocky Mountain, Health Plan of Nevada, Sierra Health), Allied Benefit Systems, Aspirus Health Plan and 40 more | 1336167550 Reedley Community Hospital1528324167 Reedley Community Hospital1881677292 Reedley Community Hospitaland 50 more |
Source: PayerPrice analysis of insurers' Transparency in Coverage in-network files. An EIN can cover several hospitals and clinics in a health system, and insurers sometimes list other organizations' NPIs under it.
372 West Cypress Avenue, Reedley, CA 93654
(559) 638-8155
How Adventist Health Reedley compares with other US facilities on the measures CMS publishes, mostly from Medicare patients.
Death rates
No different on 2 measures
0 better, 2 no different, 0 worse than the US rate
Deaths within 30 days, such as after a heart attack, pneumonia or stroke
Safety
No different on 1 measures
0 better, 1 no different, 0 worse than the US rate
Infections, surgical complications and other harm in the hospital
Readmissions
No different on 2 measures
0 better, 2 no different, 0 worse than the US rate
Patients back in the hospital or ER soon after leaving
Patient survey rating
3 of 5
Lower than 40% of US hospitals
From the HCAHPS survey of recent inpatients
Would definitely recommend
76%
Higher than 65% of US hospitals
US median: 71%
Surveyed patients who would definitely recommend the hospital
Hospital-acquired condition penalty
Penalized
Among the worst-performing 25% of US hospitals
Medicare cuts payments 1% for the worst-performing 25% of hospitals on infections and injuries acquired in the hospital
Time in the ER before going home
144 min
Lower than 53% of US hospitals
US median: 148 min
Median minutes from arrival to leaving for ER patients who were sent home; lower is better
Sepsis care
96%
Higher than 99% of US hospitals
US median: 65%
Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock who got every step of the recommended early treatment; higher is better
| Measure | Result | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Death rates | No different on 2 measures | |
| Safety | No different on 1 measures | |
| Readmissions | No different on 2 measures | |
| Patient survey ratingCMS: Summary star rating | 3 of 5 | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
| Would definitely recommendCMS: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital | 76% | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
| Hospital-acquired condition penaltyCMS: HAC Reduction Program payment reduction | Penalized | 2026 |
| Time in the ER before going homeCMS: Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, excluding patients transferred to another facility or psychiatric care/mental health patients. A lower number of minutes is better | 144 min | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
| Sepsis careCMS: Appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shock | 96% | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, released 2026-08-13. US comparisons rank this facility among every facility CMS reports for each measure. See Medicare Care Compare.
How Medicare adjusts Adventist Health Reedley's inpatient payments for its readmissions, quality and cost results.
No penalty
Readmissions penalty
Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program adjustment for excess readmissions, as estimated in the FY 2027 IPPS final rule.
0.00% on Medicare payments
Value-based purchasing
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing bonus or reduction for quality and cost, as estimated in the FY 2027 IPPS final rule.
Source: CMS IPPS final rule Impact File (FY 2027).
Each result CMS publishes for Adventist Health Reedley, beside the US median and the average of CA hospitals. The rank says what share of US hospitals the result is better or worse than; counts and confidence limits are not ranked.
Risk-adjusted 30-day death rates and surgical complications; lower is better.
| Measure | Adventist Health Reedley | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients2023-04-01 to 2025-03-31 | Not Available | 4.075 | |||
| Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 101 cases | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.81 | Better than 56% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for heart attack patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 11.57 | |||
| Death rate for CABG surgery patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 2.379 | |||
| Death rate for COPD patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 8.235 | |||
| Death rate for heart failure patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 10.29 | |||
| Death rate for pneumonia patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 41 cases | 12.2 | 15.2 | 14.49 | Better than 89% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for stroke patients2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 11.57 | |||
| Pressure ulcer rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 142 cases | 0.61 | 0.51 | 0.4818 | No Different Than the National Rate | Worse than 68% of US hospitals |
| Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | Not Available | 171 | |||
| Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 169 cases | 0.21 | 0.2 | 0.21 | No Different Than the National Rate | Worse than 54% of US hospitals |
| In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 168 cases | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.261 | No Different Than the National Rate | Worse than 46% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | Not Available | 2.308 | |||
| Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | Not Available | 1.668 | |||
| Postoperative respiratory failure rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | Not Available | 9.555 | |||
| Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | Not Available | 3.521 | |||
| Postoperative sepsis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | Not Available | 5.495 | |||
| Postoperative wound dehiscence rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | Not Available | 1.796 | |||
| Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | Not Available | 1.061 |
Unplanned returns to a hospital after a stay or an outpatient procedure; lower is better.
| Measure | Adventist Health Reedley | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital return days for heart attack patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 11.09 | |||
| Hospital return days for heart failure patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 7.901 | |||
| Hospital return days for pneumonia patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 37 cases | -28.8 | 3.85 | 16.67 | Better than 89% of US hospitals | |
| Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | ||||
| Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)2022-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 12.91 | |||
| Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 11.39 | |||
| Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 5.546 | |||
| Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 1.001 | Number of cases too small | ||
| Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 14.43 | |||
| Rate of readmission for CABG2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 11.19 | |||
| Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 19.94 | |||
| Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 21.41 | |||
| Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 5.612 | |||
| Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 39 cases | 16.5 | 17.2 | 17.7 | Better than 80% of US hospitals |
Standardized infection ratios (1 is the US baseline) and the counts behind them; lower is better.
| Measure | Adventist Health Reedley | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.2347 | |||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 1.834 | |||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 635 | 1,370 | 5,722 | ||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.479 | 0.9835 | 5.638 | ||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 0 | 3.347 | ||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.5696 | |||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.2147 | |||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 1.749 | |||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 293 | 1,799 | 5,308 | ||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.232 | 1.377 | 6.105 | ||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1 | 0 | 3.273 | ||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.5366 | |||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.32 | |||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 2.433 | |||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 112 | |||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 2.999 | |||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 2.368 | |||
| SSI - Colon Surgery2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.8107 | |||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.2606 | |||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 3.273 | |||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 37 | 38 | 73.49 | ||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.371 | 0.328 | 0.6136 | ||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1 | 0 | 0.5911 | ||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.7863 | |||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.3103 | |||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 2.305 | |||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 7,277 | 14,451 | 52,601 | ||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.176 | 0.567 | 3.111 | ||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 0 | 2.166 | ||
| MRSA Bacteremia2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.7784 | |||
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.046 | 0.127 | 0.1925 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 4.579 | 0.747 | 0.9502 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 5,687 | 13,646 | 48,317 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1.077 | 5.683 | 27.04 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1 | 2 | 9.99 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.929 | 0.279 | 0.383 | No Different than National Benchmark | Worse than 93% of US hospitals |
How recent inpatients answered each survey question, with CMS's star rating per topic.
| Measure | Adventist Health Reedley | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Room was "always" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 72 | 73 | 72.2 | Worse than 53% of US hospitals | |
| Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 6 | 8 | 8.78 | Better than 65% of US hospitals | |
| Room was "usually" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 22 | 18 | 19.02 | ||
| Cleanliness - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 89 | 87 | 86.82 | Better than 66% of US hospitals | |
| Cleanliness - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 4 | 4 | 3.514 | Better than 47% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "always" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 83 | 80 | 75.76 | Better than 69% of US hospitals | |
| Nurse communication - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 93 | 91 | 89.84 | Better than 69% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 3 | 4 | 5.713 | Better than 58% of US hospitals | |
| Nurse communication - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 4 | 3 | 2.855 | Better than 51% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 14 | 16 | 18.53 | ||
| Doctors "always" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 79 | 79 | 75.81 | Worse than 47% of US hospitals | |
| Doctor communication - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 91 | 91 | 89.11 | Better than 45% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 6 | 5 | 7.043 | Worse than 56% of US hospitals | |
| Doctor communication - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 3 | 3 | 2.688 | Worse than 37% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 15 | 16 | 17.15 | ||
| Staff "always" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 58 | 61 | 58.95 | Worse than 66% of US hospitals | |
| Communication about medicines - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 75 | 77 | 75.75 | Worse than 63% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 23 | 19 | 21.56 | Worse than 73% of US hospitals | |
| Communication about medicines - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 2 | 3 | 2.449 | Worse than 53% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "usually" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 19 | 19 | 19.48 | ||
| Discharge information - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 87 | 86 | 84.61 | Better than 55% of US hospitals | |
| No, staff "did not" give patients this information2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 12 | 13 | 15.03 | Better than 58% of US hospitals | |
| Discharge information - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 4 | 3 | 3.08 | Better than 55% of US hospitals | |
| Yes, staff "did" give patients this information2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 88 | 87 | 84.97 | Better than 58% of US hospitals | |
| No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 11 | 14 | 16.39 | Better than 77% of US hospitals | |
| Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 89 | 86 | 83.61 | Better than 77% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 76 | 74 | 70.69 | Better than 61% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 7 | 7 | 8.855 | Worse than 47% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 17 | 19 | 20.45 | ||
| Doctors "always" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 75 | 77 | 73.94 | Worse than 64% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 6 | 6 | 7.637 | Worse than 47% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 19 | 17 | 18.43 | ||
| Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 85 | 85 | 81.99 | Worse than 47% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 5 | 3 | 4.958 | Worse than 73% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 10 | 11 | 13.06 | ||
| Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 6 | 8 | 10.01 | Better than 63% of US hospitals | |
| Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 25 | 20 | 22.36 | ||
| Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 69 | 72 | 67.63 | Worse than 60% of US hospitals | |
| Overall hospital rating - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 88 | 88 | 86.85 | Worse than 45% of US hospitals | |
| Overall hospital rating - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 3 | 3 | 3.047 | Worse than 45% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "always" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 69 | 74 | 72.06 | Worse than 81% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 14 | 9 | 10.94 | Worse than 87% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "usually" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 17 | 16 | 17 | ||
| Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 78 | 75 | 71.11 | Better than 70% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 4 | 5 | 7.488 | Better than 66% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 18 | 20 | 21.4 | ||
| Nurses "always" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 80 | 77 | 72.49 | Better than 69% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 4 | 4 | 6.121 | Better than 45% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 16 | 19 | 21.39 | ||
| Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 91 | 86 | 82.8 | Better than 83% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 1 | 3 | 3.779 | Better than 77% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 8 | 11 | 13.42 | ||
| "Always" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 56 | 59 | 47.5 | Worse than 60% of US hospitals | |
| "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 14 | 9 | 17.79 | Worse than 76% of US hospitals | |
| "Usually" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 30 | 31 | 34.71 | ||
| Quietness - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 80 | 82 | 74.85 | Worse than 59% of US hospitals | |
| Quietness - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 3 | 3 | 2.203 | Worse than 44% of US hospitals | |
| "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 3 | 5 | 7.623 | Better than 70% of US hospitals | |
| "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 76 | 71 | 68.6 | Better than 65% of US hospitals | |
| Recommend hospital - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 91 | 87 | 85.85 | Better than 76% of US hospitals | |
| "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 21 | 23 | 23.77 | ||
| Recommend hospital - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 5 | 4 | 3.431 | The top rating, shared by 24% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "always" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 46 | 47 | 45.33 | Worse than 53% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 32 | 30 | 32.51 | Worse than 57% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "usually" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 22 | 22 | 22.16 | ||
| Summary star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 3 | 3 | 2.859 | Worse than 40% of US hospitals | |
| No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 13 | 12 | 13.94 | Worse than 52% of US hospitals | |
| Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 133 cases | 87 | 88 | 86.06 | Worse than 52% of US hospitals |
How often the hospital gave recommended care, and how fast.
| Measure | Adventist Health Reedley | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emergency department volume2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | medium | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Diagnosis Documented2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Risk Screening2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutrition Assessment2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutritional Care Plan2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Hospital Harm - Severe Hyperglycemia2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 8.289 | |||
| Hospital Harm - Severe Hypoglycemia2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 1.008 | |||
| Hospital Harm - Opioid Related Adverse Events2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 0.1852 | |||
| Healthcare workers given influenza vaccination2024-10-01 to 2025-03-31 · 2,162 cases | 94 | 79 | 69.96 | Better than 83% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time all patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, including psychiatric/mental health patients and patients who were transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 437 cases | 147 | 154 | 187 | Better than 56% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, excluding patients transferred to another facility or psychiatric care/mental health patients. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 418 cases | 144 | 148 | 182 | Better than 53% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time psychiatric/mental health patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 282 | |||
| Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before being transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 11 cases | 653 | 293 | 411 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Left before being seen2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 39,694 cases | 1 | 1 | 2.162 | Better than 42% of US hospitals | |
| Head CT results2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 75.06 | |||
| Endoscopy/polyp surveillance: appropriate follow-up interval for normal colonoscopy in average risk patients2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 92.55 | |||
| Improvement in Patient's Visual Function within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 80 | |||
| ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 48.75 | |||
| Safe Use of Opioids - Concurrent Prescribing2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 420 cases | 2 | 15 | 13.67 | Better than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shock2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 25 cases | 96 | 65 | 68.8 | Better than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Septic Shock 3-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 76.38 | |||
| Septic Shock 6-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 86.64 | |||
| Severe Sepsis 3-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 25 cases | 100 | 82 | 82.89 | The best result, shared by 1% of US hospitals | |
| Severe Sepsis 6-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 13 cases | 100 | 94 | 93.98 | The best result, shared by 10% of US hospitals | |
| Discharged on Antithrombotic Therapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 93.4 | |||
| Anticoagulation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 70.68 | |||
| Antithrombotic Therapy by End of Hospital Day 22024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 89.93 | |||
| Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 196 cases | 97 | 90 | 86.9 | Better than 79% of US hospitals | |
| Intensive Care Unit Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 94.78 |
How often scans were ordered when they may not be needed; lower is better.
| Measure | Adventist Health Reedley | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdomen CT Use of Contrast Material2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | 7.6 | 5 | 4.959 | Worse than 75% of US hospitals | |
| Breast Cancer Screening Recall Rates2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | 0.3 | 6.6 | 8.417 | Better than 99% of US hospitals |
Medicare spending around an inpatient stay compared with the US (1 is the US median).
| Measure | Adventist Health Reedley | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary)2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 1.06 | 0.99 | 1.024 | Worse than 82% of US hospitals |
Excess readmission ratios by condition; above 1 means more readmissions than expected.
| Measure | Adventist Health Reedley | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| READM-30-AMI-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | N/A | 1.015 | |||
| READM-30-CABG-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | N/A | 1.005 | |||
| READM-30-COPD-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | N/A | 1.002 | |||
| READM-30-HF-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | N/A | 1.017 | |||
| READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | N/A | 0.9788 | |||
| READM-30-PN-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | 0.9855 | 0.9955 | 1.026 | Better than 57% of US hospitals |
| By fiscal year | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| READM-30-AMI-HRRP | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| READM-30-CABG-HRRP | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| READM-30-COPD-HRRP | 1.015 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| READM-30-HF-HRRP | N/A | N/A | 1.009 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| READM-30-PN-HRRP | 0.9324 | 0.9469 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0.9855 |
Infection ratios, the PSI 90 composite and the total score Medicare ranks hospitals on; lower is better.
| Measure | Adventist Health Reedley | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAUTI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | N/A | 0.6114 | |||
| CDI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0.858 | 0.346 | 0.449 | Worse than 92% of US hospitals | |
| CLABSI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | N/A | 0.679 | |||
| HAC Reduction Program payment reductionFY 2026 | Yes | ||||
| MRSA standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | N/A | 0.7204 | |||
| Patient safety and adverse events composite (PSI 90)2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | N/A | 0.9656 | |||
| SSI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | N/A | 0.8116 | |||
| Total HAC scoreFY 2026 | 1.86 | -0.0453 | 0.02733 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals |
| By fiscal year | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAC Reduction Program payment reduction | No | No | N/A | Yes | No | Yes |
| Total HAC score | -0.9817 | -0.8247 | 0 | 0.7151 | -0.1942 | 1.86 |
Source: CMS Care Compare hospital files, latest release 2026-09-30, with program results for earlier fiscal years from CMS's archived snapshots. US medians and ranks count every hospital CMS reports; state averages are plain means of the state's reporting hospitals, not CMS's patient-weighted state rates.
The Joint Commission (since 2025)
Accreditation
Limited
Medical school affiliation
Private (not for profit)
Ownership type
49
Medicare-certified beds
85
Registered nurses (full-time equivalent)
2002
In Medicare since
Source: CMS Provider of Services file, as reported by the hospital and state surveyors.
What Adventist Health Reedley reported to Medicare in its latest cost report, covering Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025.
1,410
Inpatient discharges
Medicare 6%, Medicaid 5%
6,680
Inpatient days
37% of available bed days used
427
Employees (full-time equivalent)
12
Interns and residents (full-time equivalent)
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS) (report 838593). Figures cover the reporting period, which is not always 12 months, and are self-reported.
Inpatient days and discharges Adventist Health Reedley reported by payer. Medicare and Medicaid include their managed care plans, shown separately below.
| Medicare | Medicaid | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inpatient days | 820 | 197 | 5,663 | 6,680 |
| Discharges | 85 | 76 | 1,249 | 1,410 |
| Average length of stay | 9.6 days | 2.6 days | 4.5 days | 4.7 days |
| Average daily census | 2.2 | 0.5 | 15.5 | 18.3 |
169
Medicare Advantage days
60 discharges
2,957
Medicaid managed care days
774 discharges
158
Observation bed days
| Unit | Beds | Inpatient days | Medicare days | Occupancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adults & pediatrics | 49 | 2,673 | 241 | 15% |
| Nursery | 1,737 |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 838593, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Worksheet S-3 Part I.
What Adventist Health Reedley treats Medicare patients for most often, in 2024. 24 Medicare discharges in 2 published DRGs; 0% surgical; 100% in DRGs with complications (CC or MCC).
| Condition or procedure | Discharges | Average charges | Average Medicare payment | Estimated cost | DRG weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simple pneumonia and pleurisy with MCCMS-DRG 193, medical | 12 | $48,507 | $26,388 | $21,149 | 1.33 |
| Septicemia or severe sepsis without MV >96 hours with MCCMS-DRG 871, medical | 12 | $52,339 | $34,425 | $22,820 | 1.98 |
Source: CMS Medicare Inpatient Hospitals by Provider and Service (2024 data, released 2026-04-10), traditional Medicare only; CMS omits DRGs with fewer than 11 discharges. Estimated cost is average charges times the hospital's Medicare cost-to-charge ratio from the IPPS Impact File. Weights are the MS-DRG relative weights for the same year.
The comprehensive outpatient service groups (APCs) Adventist Health Reedley billed Medicare for most in 2024: 13 services in all.
| Service group | Services | Patients | Average charges | Average Medicare payment | US average payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive Observation ServicesAPC 8011 | 13 | 13 | $27,888 | $2,681 | $2,090 |
Source: CMS Medicare Outpatient Hospitals by Provider and Service (2024 data, released 2026-06-24), comprehensive APCs for traditional Medicare; CMS omits services with fewer than 11 claims. The US average weights every hospital by its services.
ZIP codes with the most Medicare inpatient stays at Adventist Health Reedley in 2025. Market share is this hospital's part of every hospital's Medicare stays from the ZIP code. Its published Medicare stays went from 126 in 2020 to 105 in 2025.
| ZIP code | Stays | Of this hospital's stays | Days | Charges | Market share | Share in 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93654 | 51 | 49% | 142 | $2.8M | 7% | 11% |
| 93618 | 25 | 24% | 76 | $1.3M | 4% | 6% |
| 93646 | 16 | 15% | 48 | $862,533 | 8% | |
| 93647 | 13 | 12% | 39 | $695,611 | 5% |
Source: CMS Hospital Service Area file. Shares are of the 105 stays from ZIP codes CMS publishes; it omits ZIP codes with fewer than 11 stays, so market shares count published stays only.
Staff by profession and the rooms and units Adventist Health Reedley reported at its latest Medicare certification survey (2025). Counts are people, not full-time equivalents.
4
Operating rooms
85
Registered nurses
6
Licensed practical nurses
16
Resident physicians
1
Nurse anesthetists (CRNAs)
2
Pharmacists
3
Respiratory therapists
1
Physical therapists
1
Occupational therapists
1
Speech pathologists and audiologists
13
Radiology technicians
11
Laboratory technicians
10
Medical technologists
6
Dietitians
1
Social workers
167
Other personnel
Source: CMS Provider of Services file.
250 clinicians who bill Medicare list Adventist Health Reedley as a hospital affiliation. Showing 24 of them. Book a demo to see the commercial rates insurers publish for them, or start a free trial.
Daniel Watrous, M.D.
Rheumatology Physician
NPI 1841246568
See commercial rates for Daniel Watrous, M.D.David Bryson, M.D.
Hematology & Oncology Physician
NPI 1346248077
See commercial rates for David Bryson, M.D.Robert Allen, M.D.
Family Medicine Physician
NPI 1629074489
See commercial rates for Robert Allen, M.D.Sanjai Sharma, MD
Hematology & Oncology Physician
NPI 1659458867
See commercial rates for Sanjai Sharma, MDSrikanth Naramala, M.D
Rheumatology Physician
NPI 1437412129
See commercial rates for Srikanth Naramala, M.DWilliam Carson, MD
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1053378794
See commercial rates for William Carson, MDHany Nasr, MD
Pain Medicine (Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation) Physician
NPI 1396872107
See commercial rates for Hany Nasr, MDMohsen Thomas, MD
Nephrology Physician
NPI 1225092877
See commercial rates for Mohsen Thomas, MDAsha Pritpal Sidhu, MD
Internal Medicine Physician
NPI 1255430286
See commercial rates for Asha Pritpal Sidhu, MDSreedhar Adapa, M.D.
Nephrology Physician
NPI 1881997872
See commercial rates for Sreedhar Adapa, M.D.Antonio Villalvazo
Family Medicine Physician
NPI 1689772261
See commercial rates for Antonio VillalvazoKelly Smith, M.D.
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1144201799
See commercial rates for Kelly Smith, M.D.Howard Pettigrew, MD, PHD
Allergy Physician
NPI 1891961835
See commercial rates for Howard Pettigrew, MD, PHDSeung Hur, MD
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1063739027
See commercial rates for Seung Hur, MDWilliam Schiff, M.D.
Urology Physician
NPI 1629073226
See commercial rates for William Schiff, M.D.Hanumandla Reddy, M.D
Specialist
NPI 1164490967
See commercial rates for Hanumandla Reddy, M.DChandrasekar Palaniswamy, MD
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician
NPI 1316170749
See commercial rates for Chandrasekar Palaniswamy, MDAmarinder Singh Garcha, MBBS
Nephrology Physician
NPI 1770817744
See commercial rates for Amarinder Singh Garcha, MBBSHarmeet Gurm, MD
Nephrology Physician
NPI 1972831790
See commercial rates for Harmeet Gurm, MDBhupinder Chatrath, MD
Hematology & Oncology Physician
NPI 1023082088
See commercial rates for Bhupinder Chatrath, MDPrem Sahasranam, M.D.
Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Physician
NPI 1720270820
See commercial rates for Prem Sahasranam, M.D.Leo Fong, MD
Vascular Surgery Physician
NPI 1215047659
See commercial rates for Leo Fong, MDShashi Sharma, D.M.
Interventional Cardiology Physician
NPI 1356487656
See commercial rates for Shashi Sharma, D.M.Khoi Le, M.D.
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician
NPI 1629048012
See commercial rates for Khoi Le, M.D.Source: CMS Doctors and Clinicians facility affiliations, released 2026-10-15, with names and specialties from NPPES. Affiliation means the clinician bills Medicare for care at this hospital; it is not employment.
Revenue, expenses and income Adventist Health Reedley reported to Medicare for Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025. Percentages are of net patient revenue.
| Line | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Gross patient revenue (charges) | $530.2M | 239.3% |
| Inpatient | $56.7M | 25.6% |
| Outpatient | $473.4M | 213.6% |
| Contractual allowances and discounts | -$308.6M | -139.3% |
| Net patient revenue | $221.6M | 100.0% |
| Operating expenses | -$229M | -103.3% |
| Operating income from patient care | -$7.4M | -3.3% |
| Other income | $36.2M | 16.3% |
| Contributions and donations | $1.4M | 0.7% |
| Other | $34.8M | 15.7% |
| Net income | $28.8M | 13.0% |
| Line | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional Medicare | $29.6M | 5.7% |
| Medicaid (including managed care) | $331.2M | 63.8% |
| Other payers and self-pay | $158.3M | 30.5% |
| Total charges | $519.1M | 100.0% |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 838593, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Traditional Medicare is the program charges on Worksheets D-3 and D Part V; Medicaid is from Worksheet S-10.
Computed from Adventist Health Reedley's latest cost report.
-3.3%
Operating margin
Operating income from patient care / net patient revenue
11.2%
Total margin
Net income / net patient revenue plus other income
12.0%
EBITDAR margin
Net income before interest, depreciation and leases (Worksheet A-7), / total revenue
39% of expenses
Personnel costs
Salaries, direct-care contract labor and core wage-related costs / operating expenses
$41.56
Average hourly wage
Adjusted salaries / paid hours (Worksheet S-3 Part II)
7.7%
Return on assets
Net income for a year / total assets
11.9%
Return on equity
Net income for a year / fund balance
0.22
Long-term debt to fund balance
Mortgages, notes and loans / fund balance
5.29
Current ratio
Current assets / current liabilities
3.99
Quick ratio
Cash, temporary investments and net receivables / current liabilities
311 days
Days cash on hand
Cash and temporary investments / daily operating expenses excluding depreciation
37 days
Days in patient receivables
Net patient receivables / daily net patient revenue
87 days
Average payment period
Current liabilities / daily operating expenses excluding depreciation
0.69
Asset turnover
Total revenue for a year / total assets
112.9 years
Average age of plant
Accumulated depreciation / depreciation for a year
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 838593, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
What Adventist Health Reedley owned and owed at the end of its reporting period (Dec 2025), across all fund types: $374.4M in total assets and a $242.2M fund balance.
| Line | Amount | Of total assets |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and temporary investments | $194.4M | 51.9% |
| Patient receivables, net | $22.7M | 6.1% |
| Inventory | $977,779 | 0.3% |
| Total current assets | $288.1M | 77.0% |
| Property and equipment, net of depreciation | $51.3M | 13.7% |
| Investments and other assets | $34.9M | 9.3% |
| Total assets | $374.4M | 100.0% |
| Current liabilities | $54.4M | 14.5% |
| Long-term debt | $53.9M | 14.4% |
| Total liabilities | $132.2M | 35.3% |
| Fund balance (net assets) | $242.2M | 64.7% |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 838593, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
Care Adventist Health Reedley provided without full payment, as reported on Worksheet S-10 of its cost report.
$8.2M
Cost of charity care
Care for patients approved for charity care and uninsured discounts, at cost
$4.4M
Bad debt
Patient bills written off as uncollectible, at charges
-$93,561
Medicaid shortfall
Cost of Medicaid patients (charges times the cost-to-charge ratio) minus Medicaid payments; negative means a surplus
$10.1M
Total unreimbursed and uncompensated care
4.4% of operating expenses
Medicaid, CHIP and indigent care shortfalls plus charity care and the cost of bad debt (Worksheet S-10 line 31)
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 838593, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
Adventist Health Reedley's full-year cost reports, by fiscal year end. Reports shorter than ten months are left out.
| Fiscal year ending | Dec 2020 | Dec 2021 | Dec 2022 | Dec 2023 | Dec 2024 | Dec 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $164.6M | $175.2M | $187.1M | $185.9M | $219.2M | $221.6M |
| Operating expenses | $169.7M | $173.3M | $183.7M | $194.3M | $215.1M | $229M |
| Operating margin | -3.1% | 1.1% | 1.8% | -4.5% | 1.8% | -3.3% |
| Net income | $28.2M | $36.5M | $43.8M | $13.7M | $24.3M | $28.8M |
| Total assets | $220.6M | $289.6M | $284.9M | $294.4M | $308.5M | $374.4M |
| Discharges | 1,706 | 1,746 | 1,587 | 1,469 | 1,624 | 1,410 |
| Inpatient days | 7,680 | 9,224 | 8,695 | 7,640 | 6,783 | 6,680 |
| Medicare Advantage days | 204 | 295 | 227 | 225 | 206 | 169 |
| Beds | 49 | 49 | 49 | 49 | 49 | 49 |
| Employees (FTE) | 272 | 274 | 301 | 376 | 424 | 427 |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 838593, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
Each cost center Adventist Health Reedley reports, largest first. Total cost includes its share of overhead; the cost-to-charge ratio is total cost / charges.
| Department | Salaries | Total cost | Charges | Cost-to-charge | Square feet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rural health clinic | $8.1M | $35.3M | $27.7M | 1.28 | 79,958 |
| Rural health clinic ix | $3.2M | $19.6M | $12.3M | 1.59 | |
| Emergency | $5.3M | $14.5M | $160.7M | 0.09 | 5,521 |
| Rural health clinic - tulare | $1.8M | $8.6M | $6.1M | 1.42 | |
| Rural health clinic xiv | $1.9M | $7.8M | $8.5M | 0.92 | |
| Rural health clinic xi | $1.8M | $7.2M | $6.2M | 1.16 | |
| Rural health clinic - corcoran east | $1.5M | $7.1M | $4.7M | 1.51 | 42,000 |
| Delivery room & labor room | $4.2M | $7M | $17.5M | 0.40 | 12,013 |
| Radiology-diagnostic | $2.6M | $6.6M | $25M | 0.26 | 2,807 |
| Laboratory | $1.5M | $6.5M | $59M | 0.11 | 2,247 |
| Rural health clinic xv | $1.4M | $6.4M | $5.5M | 1.17 | |
| Rural health clinic - oakhurst | $1.6M | $5.8M | $3.6M | 1.61 | |
| Rural health clinic vi | $1.5M | $5.5M | $4.3M | 1.28 | 1,860 |
| Rural health clinic xiii | $1.2M | $5M | $3.8M | 1.31 | |
| Rural health clinic x | $1.4M | $4.8M | $5.2M | 0.92 | |
| Rural health clinic - womens health | $1.1M | $4.7M | $3.9M | 1.20 | 6,578 |
| Drugs charged to patients | $4.6M | $13.9M | 0.33 | ||
| Rural health clinic xii | $985,175 | $4.1M | $3.4M | 1.19 | 4,696 |
| Rural health clinic v | $1.3M | $4M | $3.6M | 1.10 | 8,719 |
| Rural health clinic vii | $1.3M | $3.5M | $3.6M | 0.97 | |
| Rural health clinic xxii | $672,219 | $3.2M | $3.3M | 0.96 | 4,200 |
| Rural health clinic xviii | $597,997 | $3.1M | $2.9M | 1.08 | |
| Rural health clinic - riverdale | $832,377 | $2.8M | $2.3M | 1.25 | 9,240 |
| Rural health clinic xix | $651,014 | $2.7M | $2.3M | 1.16 | |
| Operating room | $661,879 | $2.6M | $7M | 0.37 | 5,160 |
| Rural health clinic xxiv | $558,145 | $2.4M | $2M | 1.18 | |
| Rural health clinic xx | $415,739 | $2.4M | $2M | 1.17 | 3,576 |
| Rural health clinic - dinuba plaza | $615,326 | $2.3M | $1.5M | 1.52 | |
| Rural health clinic xxiii | $423,351 | $1.9M | $1.8M | 1.10 | |
| Physical therapy | $863,546 | $1.9M | $6.9M | 0.27 | 623 |
| Rural health clinic xxi | $467,448 | $1.8M | $1.4M | 1.33 | |
| Ct scan | $572,021 | $1.6M | $44.2M | 0.04 | 159 |
| Rural health clinic viii | $585,172 | $1.5M | $1.5M | 1.03 | |
| Rural health clinic - madera rancho | $567,957 | $1.5M | $578,344 | 2.58 | 3,200 |
| Rural health clinic - wasco | $292,488 | $1.4M | $942,934 | 1.52 | |
| Ultra sound | $619,236 | $1.4M | $15.8M | 0.09 | 386 |
| Rural health clinic - earlimart | $247,363 | $1.3M | $435,072 | 3.08 | |
| Respiratory therapy | $618,062 | $1.3M | $9.2M | 0.14 | 296 |
| Rural health clinic - caruthers eas | $429,613 | $1.3M | $984,926 | 1.29 | 3,000 |
| Rural health clinic xvii | $484,584 | $1.2M | $759,195 | 1.64 | |
| Rural health clinic xvi | $319,848 | $1.2M | $434,231 | 2.79 | |
| Rural health clinic iii | $247,308 | $1.2M | $369,099 | 3.22 | |
| Rural health clinic - shafter | $334,077 | $1.1M | $626,931 | 1.74 | 2,800 |
| Rural health clinic xxv | $398,257 | $973,031 | $639,644 | 1.52 | 1,121 |
| Rural health clinic ii | $252,464 | $761,178 | $500,069 | 1.52 | |
| Observation beds (non-distinct part | $681,411 | $384,372 | 1.77 | ||
| Mri | $222,713 | $537,613 | $9.7M | 0.06 | 159 |
| Rural health clinic iv | $923 | $256,741 | |||
| Whole blood & packed red blood cell | $224,425 | $136,329 | 1.65 | ||
| Medical supplies charged to patient | $176,842 | $137,987 | 1.28 | ||
| Anesthesiology | $63,922 | $890,435 | 0.07 | 123 | |
| Impl. dev. charged to patients | $56,248 | $248,589 | 0.23 | ||
| Electrocardiology | $14,732 | $299,770 | 0.05 |
| Department | Salaries | Total cost | Charges | Cost-to-charge | Square feet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adults & pediatrics | $3.9M | $12.2M | $12.9M | 0.94 | 12,521 |
| Nursery | $5.1M | $5.4M | 0.94 | 1,357 |
| Department | Salaries | Direct cost | Paid hours | Average hourly wage | Square feet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative & general | $11M | $67.8M | 309,289 | $35.54 | 6,857 |
| Employee benefits department | $807,342 | $19.4M | 13,595 | $59.39 | 1,000 |
| Medical records & library | $3.2M | ||||
| Nursing administration | $2.3M | $2.9M | 41,219 | $55.35 | 667 |
| Operation of plant | $2.9M | 13,335 | |||
| Cap rel costs-bldg & fixt | $2.7M | 249,925 | |||
| Maintenance & repairs | $433,888 | $2.7M | 10,145 | $42.77 | 7,574 |
| Social service | $2M | 287 | |||
| Housekeeping | $1.7M | 953 | |||
| Pharmacy | $463,378 | $1.5M | 6,737 | $68.78 | 909 |
| I&r services-salary & fringes apprv | $936,063 | ||||
| Cafeteria | $632,404 | 12,715 | $29.93 | 1,897 | |
| Central services & supply | $381,420 | $482,564 | 11,918 | $32.00 | 1,101 |
| Laundry & linen service | $225,649 | 745 | |||
| Cap rel costs-mvble equip | $61,096 |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 838593, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Worksheets A, B-1, C Part I and S-3 Part II.
The factors Medicare uses to set what it pays Adventist Health Reedley for an inpatient stay.
1.21
Case mix index
Higher than 7% of hospitals paid under Medicare IPPS
Average Medicare DRG weight of its inpatient cases (FY 2027); higher means more complex, costlier care.
Major teaching hospital
Teaching status
0.25 residents per bed
Medicare-funded interns and residents per bed (FY 2027).
78.6%
Low-income patient share
Disproportionate share percentage: Medicaid and SSI patient days CMS uses for safety-net payments (FY 2027).
88
Medicare inpatient stays
Medicare claims CMS based FY 2027 payment rates on.
Urban (metro area)
Location type
Geographic area CMS assigns before any wage index reclassification (FY 2027).
| IPPS fiscal year | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 | FY 2027 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case mix index | 1.09 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.23 | 1.27 | 1.21 |
| Wage index | 1.275 | 1.269 | 1.253 | 1.519 | 1.451 | 1.431 | 1.399 |
| Readmissions adjustment | 0.00% | -0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Value-based purchasing adjustment | +0.34% | -0.87% | -0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Medicare inpatient stays | 205 | 205 | 95 | 93 | 76 | 96 | 88 |
Source: CMS IPPS final rule Impact File (FY 2027).
The officers and board members on Adventist Health Reedley's Medicare enrollment and on the IRS Form 990 filed under its tax ID.
Source: CMS Hospital All Owners (PECOS), the people the hospital lists on its Medicare enrollment; the first 18 of 20 are shown.
Reedley Community Hospital files the Form 990 for the tax ID insurers list for Adventist Health Reedley, so these people may lead the wider organization rather than Adventist Health Reedley alone.
| Name | Title |
|---|---|
| Heinrich Kerry | Director/ceo |
| Hofheins Todd | Coo/vice Chair |
| Beaman John | Cfo/asst Secty |
| Stevens Eric eff 724 | President |
| Wells Jason | President |
| Jobe Meredith | Secretary |
| Kofl Andrea thru 124 | Ctrl Vally Pres |
| Haydock Timothy | Treas/asst Sec |
| Cox Shane thru 724 | Treasurer |
| Thordarson Heidar | Treasurer |
Board members: Freedman John, Newton Bradford, Cherry Robert, Davis Andrew, Innocent Larry, Reiner Richard, Wagner Jack, Woodson Marc, Salazar Velino, Fehr Joy, and 4 more on the return.
Source: IRS Form 990 Part VII filed by Reedley Community Hospital (EIN 45-3220509), via the IRS e-file data. A health system's return can cover several hospitals.
340B drug pricing program
Participating since 2013
340B ID DSH050192, registered as a disproportionate share hospital; 39 registered outpatient sites; 70 active contract pharmacies. Authorizing official: Timothy Michael Haydock, CFO.
Source: HRSA 340B Office of Pharmacy Affairs Information System.
Adventist health reedley
CCN 05U192, certified 1989, Medicare prospective payment
Hanford
CCN 553983, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Huron
CCN 058611, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Coalinga
CCN 058596, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Corcoran
CCN 058552, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Lemoore
CCN 058600, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Selma
CCN 058617, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Dinuba
CCN 058613, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Caruthers
CCN 058592, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Fowler
CCN 058595, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Kerman
CCN 058599, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Rose
CCN 058610, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Home garden
CCN 058630, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Sanger
CCN 058644, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Reedley
CCN 058638, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Kingsburg
CCN 058653, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Taft
CCN 058685, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Avenal
CCN 058635, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Orosi
CCN 058673, certified 2014, Medicare cost reimbursed
Parlier
CCN 058569, certified 2000, Medicare cost reimbursed
Cypress
CCN 058589, certified 2002, Medicare cost reimbursed
Jefferson
CCN 058664, certified 2013, Medicare cost reimbursed
Childrens
CCN 058540, certified 1996, Medicare cost reimbursed
Orange cove
CCN 058621, certified 2007, Medicare cost reimbursed
Dinuba west
CCN 058568, certified 2005, Medicare cost reimbursed
Avenal west
CCN 058665, certified 2013, Medicare cost reimbursed
Caruthers east
CCN 058669, certified 2013, Medicare cost reimbursed
Corcoran east
CCN 058666, certified 2013, Medicare cost reimbursed
Riverdale
CCN 058667, certified 2013, Medicare cost reimbursed
Dinuba plaza
CCN 058672, certified 2014, Medicare cost reimbursed
Oakhurst
CCN 058675, certified 2014, Medicare cost reimbursed
Womens health
CCN 058683, certified 2015, Medicare cost reimbursed
Madera ranchos
CCN 058690, certified 2016, Medicare cost reimbursed
Wasco
CCN 058692, certified 2016, Medicare cost reimbursed
Shafter
CCN 058691, certified 2016, Medicare cost reimbursed
Tulare
CCN 058718, certified 2021, Medicare cost reimbursed
Earlimart
CCN 058719, certified 2021, Medicare cost reimbursed
Source: Worksheet S-2 Part I of Adventist Health Reedley's latest Medicare cost report (HCRIS).
About Adventist Health Reedley's rates and hospital price transparency.
For MRI brain before and after contrast (CPT 70553), published negotiated rates at Adventist Health Reedley range from $208 to $3,004 across 4 insurers. Cigna's rate is $2,951. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $1,954. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
For CT head or brain without contrast (CPT 70450), published negotiated rates at Adventist Health Reedley range from $77 to $2,043 across 4 insurers. Aetna's rate is $1,090. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $1,110. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
For Colonoscopy with biopsy (CPT 45380), published negotiated rates at Adventist Health Reedley range from $440 to $7,535 across 4 insurers. Anthem Blue Cross / Blue Shield of CA's rate is $6,328. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $4,623. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
For Screening mammography, bilateral (CPT 77067), published negotiated rates at Adventist Health Reedley range from $42 to $220 across 4 insurers. Aetna's rate is $220. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $293. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
Yes. CMS counts 0.25 Medicare-funded residents per bed at Adventist Health Reedley for fiscal year 2027, so it is a major teaching hospital.
No. Adventist Health Reedley has no Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program penalty in fiscal year 2027.
In 2024, the most common were simple pneumonia and pleurisy with mcc (12 discharges), septicemia or severe sepsis without mv >96 hours with mcc (12 discharges).
Adventist Health Reedley's Medicare case mix index is 1.21 for fiscal year 2027, higher than 7% of hospitals paid under the inpatient prospective payment system.
Adventist Health Reedley reported 1,410 inpatient discharges and 6,680 inpatient days from Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025.
Adventist Health Reedley reported 427 full-time-equivalent employees on payroll from Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025.
Adventist Health Reedley reported $221.6M in net patient revenue on $530.2M of gross charges for Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025, an operating margin of -3.3%, and net income of $28.8M.
Adventist Health Reedley reported $10.1M of unreimbursed and uncompensated care for Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025, including $8.2M of charity care at cost.
Adventist Health Reedley's Medicare enrollment lists Jason Wells as President since 2024.
Insurers' price transparency files list Adventist Health Reedley under employer identification number 45-3220509 (Reedley Community Hospital). 45 health plans and networks list 45-3220509 for it.
Yes. HRSA's 340B database lists Adventist Health Reedley (340B ID DSH050192) as a participating disproportionate share hospital since 2013, with 70 active contract pharmacies.
250 clinicians who bill Medicare list Adventist Health Reedley as a hospital affiliation in CMS's Doctors and Clinicians data. The largest groups are family medicine physician (44), family nurse practitioner (30), internal medicine physician (19).
Yes. CMS's Provider of Services file lists The Joint Commission as the accrediting organization for Adventist Health Reedley, effective 2025.
CMS lists 21 services at Adventist Health Reedley, including Anesthesia, CARF Inpatient Rehabilitation (Commission On Accreditation Of Rehabilitation Facilities Inpatient Rehabilitation), Clinical Laboratory, CT Scan, Diagnostic Radiology, Dietary Care.
In CMS's 2025 Hospital Service Area file, the most Medicare inpatient stays at Adventist Health Reedley came from ZIP codes 93654 (51), 93618 (25), 93646 (16).
Adventist Health Reedley has 49 beds, including its psychiatric, rehabilitation and other subprovider units, in its latest Medicare cost report. Facility type: Short Term Acute Care Hospital.
Adventist Health Reedley is located at 372 West Cypress Avenue, Reedley, CA 93654. Its main phone number is (559) 638-8155.
Adventist Health Reedley's CMS Certification Number (CCN), also called its Medicare provider number, is 050192.
The National Provider Identifier (NPI) on file for Adventist Health Reedley is 1336167550.
Adventist Health Reedley is affiliated with Adventist Health.
Adventist Health Reedley lists 31 in-network payers, including Aetna, Ameri Health, Aspirus Health Plan, Avera Health Plans, and is Medicare-certified. Insurance acceptance may vary by plan, so confirm coverage with your insurer or the hospital's billing department.
253 disclosed rate categories. Each shows the payer, category, code type and group with its code range, and contract type, along with how the rate compares with the state average.
Under 45 CFR Part 180, every US hospital must publish a machine-readable file of its standard charges, including gross charges, discounted cash prices and payer-specific negotiated rates, in the CMS template format. PayerPrice can help hospitals publish and maintain these files.
A chargemaster (charge description master, or CDM) is a hospital's master list of billable items, with codes, descriptions and gross charges. A chargemaster review looks at those lines for accuracy and pricing. PayerPrice can help hospitals review their chargemaster; contact us to discuss your needs.
For hospital finance and compliance teams
The data on this page comes from the files hospitals and payers publish. We help hospitals publish theirs correctly, and take a fresh look at their chargemaster.
We turn your chargemaster and payer contracts into the CMS template file, then keep it current as rates change.
{
"description": "MRI of brain (no contrast)",
"code_information": [
{ "code": "611", "type": "RC" },
{ "code": "70551", "type": "CPT" }
],
"standard_charges": [{
"setting": "outpatient",
"minimum": 250,
"maximum": 400,
"gross_charge": 1200,
"discounted_cash": 1080,
"payers_information": [
{
"payer_name": "Platform Health Insurance",
"plan_name": "PPO",
"methodology": "fee schedule",
"standard_charge_dollar": 400
},
{
"payer_name": "Region Health Insurance",
"plan_name": "HMO",
"methodology": "fee schedule",
"standard_charge_dollar": 250
}
]
}]
}Your chargemaster sets the gross charge on every claim, and many payer contracts base payment on it through percent-of-charge, lesser-of and stop-loss terms. We audit it line by line and show how your charges and negotiated rates compare with peer hospitals before your next negotiation.
What a review covers