Short Term Acute Care HospitalVoluntary Non-Profit - Private

Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital

Emanate Health · Glendora, CA

250 South Grand Avenue, Glendora, CA 91741(626) 963-8411

3 of 5

CMS star rating

105

Beds

5,283

Inpatient discharges a year

$148.6M

Net patient revenue a year

In-network payers

About this hospital

Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital is a 105-bed voluntary non-profit - private hospital in Glendora, CA, affiliated with Emanate Health. Below you'll find publicly disclosed negotiated rates and facility details, including 35 in-network payers and 299 disclosed rate categories.

Disproportionate share hospital
Helipad

CCN: 050597
NPI: 1992733513
Website: emanatehealth.org
Health system: Emanate Health
Teaching: Teaching hospital
County: Los Angeles County
Metro area: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA MSA
Medicare contractor: Jurisdiction E, Noridian Healthcare Solutions (01011)
In Medicare since: 1973
Last CMS survey: 2017

Prices for common services

The 24 services Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital most likely performs, ranked by likely volume and what it is paid. Each service names one insurer. * marks hidden insurer names; A, B and C rank the remaining rates from low to high and reset for each service.

Book a demo to see hidden insurer names, more payer rates, and hospital data, or start a free trial.

Sort

Childbirth · Inpatient

Vaginal delivery, hospital stay

MS-DRG 807

$7,851 - $14,700

from 4 insurers · median $11,324

UnitedHealthcare$10,559

Insurer A*$7,851

Insurer B*$12,089

Insurer C*$14,700

CMS lists this service as CPT 59400, the obstetrician's global fee. The hospital bills the delivery stay as MS-DRG 807, so these are facility case rates.

Hospital reports neonatal nursery services to CMS

Childbirth · Inpatient

Cesarean delivery, hospital stay

MS-DRG 788

$11,015 - $19,944

from 4 insurers · median $13,733

UnitedHealthcare$15,400

Insurer A*$11,015

Insurer B*$12,067

Insurer C*$19,944

CMS lists this service as CPT 59510, the obstetrician's global fee. The hospital bills the delivery stay as MS-DRG 788, so these are facility case rates.

Hospital reports neonatal nursery services to CMS

Gynecology

Hysteroscopy with sampling of the uterine lining

CPT 58558

$3,867 - $4,905

from 4 insurers · median $4,161

Aetna$4,301

Insurer A*$3,867

Insurer B*$4,021

Insurer C*$4,905

Medicare $4,230Nearby hospitals $3,06736% above nearby hospitals

11 Medicare claims in Level 4 Gynecologic Procedures (CMS 2024)

Childbirth · Inpatient

Vaginal birth after prior cesarean, hospital stay

MS-DRG 807

$7,851 - $14,700

from 4 insurers · median $11,324

UnitedHealthcare$10,559

Insurer A*$7,851

Insurer B*$12,089

Insurer C*$14,700

CMS lists this service as CPT 59610, the obstetrician's global fee. The hospital bills the delivery stay as MS-DRG 807, so these are facility case rates.

Hospital reports neonatal nursery services to CMS

How the insurers pay at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital

Median rate as a percent of Medicare across the outpatient services above, and how many services sit above or below the same insurer's median at nearby hospitals. * marks hidden insurer names. These table labels track the same insurers across services; the labels on each service card reset.

Insurer	Services	Median % of Medicare	Above nearby	Below nearby
Insurer A*	21	284%	17	0
Insurer B*	24	233%	2	6
Insurer C*	22	220%	13	3
Insurer D*	23	169%	13	4

How we chose these services: 6 appear in this hospital's own Medicare claims, 12 are common here based on CMS Medicare volume, and 6 are typical for the service lines it reports to CMS. Rates come from insurer and hospital price transparency files as of October 2026. Rates under a quarter of Medicare or over 20 times Medicare are left out as likely physician-fee rows or file errors. Book a demo to see all 300 CMS shoppable services for Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital, or start a free trial.

Insurance Accepted

Acceptance varies by plan and service. Confirm coverage with your insurer or the hospital's billing department.

AmbetterAmeri HealthAspirus Health PlanAvera Health PlansBanner HealthCentene

More about this hospital

Quality
3 of 5 stars
- 160 min in the ER before going home (US median 148)
- No Medicare readmissions penalty
See quality ratings
Doctors and services
Accredited by The Joint Commission
- Teaching hospital
- 27 services
- 309 affiliated clinicians
See doctors and services
Finances
$148.6M net patient revenue
- Operating margin on patient care 10.8%
- $10.1M unreimbursed and uncompensated care
- $20.1M net income
See finances
Ownership and leadership
Owned by Emanate Health
- Private (not for profit)
- Rajesh K Sharma, chief executive
See ownership and leadership

Tax IDs and NPIs insurers list

The employer identification numbers (EINs) health plans and networks list for Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital in the in-network rate files they publish, with the organization NPIs billed under each.

Tax ID (EIN)	Plans and networks listing it	Organization NPIs
95-2413054Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital	62Aetna, Cigna, United Healthcare (incl Optum, Rocky Mountain, Health Plan of Nevada, Sierra Health), Allied Benefit Systems, Ambetter and 57 more	1992733513 Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital1194741108 Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital1356007819 Grandview Medical Group Inc.and 1 more

Source: PayerPrice analysis of insurers' Transparency in Coverage in-network files. An EIN can cover several hospitals and clinics in a health system, and insurers sometimes list other organizations' NPIs under it.

Location

250 South Grand Avenue, Glendora, CA 91741

(626) 963-8411

Get directions

Quality ratings (CMS Care Compare)

How Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital compares with other US facilities on the measures CMS publishes, mostly from Medicare patients.

Overall star rating
3 of 5
Lower than 42% of US hospitals
Combines death rates, safety, readmissions, patient experience and timely care
Death rates
No different on 6 measures
0 better, 6 no different, 0 worse than the US rate
Deaths within 30 days, such as after a heart attack, pneumonia or stroke
Safety
Better on 2 of 6 measures
2 better, 4 no different, 0 worse than the US rate
Infections, surgical complications and other harm in the hospital
Readmissions
Better on 1 of 6 measures
1 better, 5 no different, 0 worse than the US rate
Patients back in the hospital or ER soon after leaving
Patient survey rating
2 of 5
Lower than 81% of US hospitals
From the HCAHPS survey of recent inpatients
Would definitely recommend
63%
Lower than 79% of US hospitals
US median: 71%
Surveyed patients who would definitely recommend the hospital
Hospital-acquired condition penalty
Not penalized
Not among the worst-performing 25%
Medicare cuts payments 1% for the worst-performing 25% of hospitals on infections and injuries acquired in the hospital
Serious complications (PSI 90)
1.16
Higher than 87% of US hospitals
US median: 0.96
Risk-adjusted composite of complications such as bedsores, falls with hip fracture and blood clots after surgery; lower is better
Time in the ER before going home
160 min
Higher than 58% of US hospitals
US median: 148 min
Median minutes from arrival to leaving for ER patients who were sent home; lower is better
Sepsis care
75%
Higher than 73% of US hospitals
US median: 65%
Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock who got every step of the recommended early treatment; higher is better

Measure details and reporting periods

Measure	Result	Period
Overall star ratingCMS: Overall hospital quality star rating	3 of 5
Death rates	No different on 6 measures
Safety	Better on 2 of 6 measures
Readmissions	Better on 1 of 6 measures
Patient survey ratingCMS: Summary star rating	2 of 5	2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30
Would definitely recommendCMS: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital	63%	2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30
Hospital-acquired condition penaltyCMS: HAC Reduction Program payment reduction	Not penalized	2026
Serious complications (PSI 90)CMS: Patient safety and adverse events composite (PSI 90)	1.16	2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30
Time in the ER before going homeCMS: Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, excluding patients transferred to another facility or psychiatric care/mental health patients. A lower number of minutes is better	160 min	2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30
Sepsis careCMS: Appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shock	75%	2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, released 2026-08-13. US comparisons rank this facility among every facility CMS reports for each measure. See Medicare Care Compare.

Medicare quality penalties and bonuses

How Medicare adjusts Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital's inpatient payments for its readmissions, quality and cost results.

No penalty
Readmissions penalty
Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program adjustment for excess readmissions, as estimated in the FY 2027 IPPS final rule.
-0.62% on Medicare payments
Value-based purchasing
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing bonus or reduction for quality and cost, as estimated in the FY 2027 IPPS final rule.

Source: CMS IPPS final rule Impact File (FY 2027).

Every CMS quality measure

Each result CMS publishes for Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital, beside the US median and the average of CA hospitals. The rank says what share of US hospitals the result is better or worse than; counts and confidence limits are not ranked.

Deaths and complications19 measures

Risk-adjusted 30-day death rates and surgical complications; lower is better.

Measure	This hospital	US median	CA average	CMS comparison	US rank
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients2023-04-01 to 2025-03-31	Not Available		4.075
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 1,404 cases	4.7	3.9	3.81		Worse than 83% of US hospitals
Death rate for heart attack patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 43 cases	11.3	11.8	11.57		Better than 66% of US hospitals
Death rate for CABG surgery patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30	Not Available		2.379
Death rate for COPD patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 45 cases	9.2	8.5	8.235		Worse than 68% of US hospitals
Death rate for heart failure patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 108 cases	10.8	11	10.29		Better than 53% of US hospitals
Death rate for pneumonia patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 295 cases	15.4	15.2	14.49		Worse than 53% of US hospitals
Death rate for stroke patients2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 64 cases	12.7	11.6	11.57		Worse than 66% of US hospitals
Pressure ulcer rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 1,999 cases	0.97	0.51	0.4818	No Different Than the National Rate	Worse than 87% of US hospitals
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30	Not Available		171	Number of Cases Too Small
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 2,439 cases	0.19	0.2	0.21	No Different Than the National Rate	Better than 66% of US hospitals
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 2,452 cases	0.3	0.27	0.261	No Different Than the National Rate	Worse than 78% of US hospitals
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 283 cases	2.51	2.29	2.308	No Different Than the National Rate	Worse than 76% of US hospitals
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 71 cases	1.65	1.63	1.668	No Different Than the National Rate	Worse than 55% of US hospitals
Postoperative respiratory failure rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 77 cases	10.99	8.88	9.555	No Different Than the National Rate	Worse than 76% of US hospitals
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 286 cases	3.57	3.4	3.521	No Different Than the National Rate	Worse than 65% of US hospitals
Postoperative sepsis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 56 cases	5.86	5.105	5.495	No Different Than the National Rate	Worse than 76% of US hospitals
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 105 cases	1.71	1.72	1.796	No Different Than the National Rate	Better than 53% of US hospitals
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 475 cases	0.96	1.02	1.061	No Different Than the National Rate	Better than 70% of US hospitals

Readmissions and return visits14 measures

Unplanned returns to a hospital after a stay or an outpatient procedure; lower is better.

Measure	This hospital	US median	CA average	CMS comparison	US rank
Hospital return days for heart attack patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30	Not Available		11.09
Hospital return days for heart failure patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 139 cases	25.2	1.25	7.901		Worse than 79% of US hospitals
Hospital return days for pneumonia patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 308 cases	-8	3.85	16.67		Better than 66% of US hospitals
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30	Not Available
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)2022-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 293 cases	12.1	12.9	12.91	No Different Than the National Rate	Better than 89% of US hospitals
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	Not Available		11.39	Number of Cases Too Small
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	Not Available		5.546	Number of Cases Too Small
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 174 cases	0.9	1	1.001	No Different than expected	Better than 68% of US hospitals
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 44 cases	14.5	14.4	14.43		Worse than 55% of US hospitals
Rate of readmission for CABG2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30	Not Available		11.19
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 85 cases	19.4	19.8	19.94		Better than 68% of US hospitals
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 234 cases	22	21.3	21.41		Worse than 71% of US hospitals
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30	Not Available		5.612
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 520 cases	15.1	17.2	17.7		Better than 99% of US hospitals

Infections36 measures

Standardized infection ratios (1 is the US baseline) and the counts behind them; lower is better.

Measure	This hospital	US median	CA average	CMS comparison	US rank
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	Not Available		0.2347	Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	0.764	1.504	1.834	Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	4,760	1,370	5,722	Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	3.923	0.9835	5.638	Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	0	0	3.347	Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	0	0.484	0.5696	Better than the National Benchmark	The best result, shared by 21% of US hospitals
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	0.111	0.138	0.2147	No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	2.187	1.392	1.749	No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	3,803	1,799	5,308	No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	3.022	1.377	6.105	No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	2	0	3.273	No Different than National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	0.662	0.399	0.5366	No Different than National Benchmark	Worse than 73% of US hospitals
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	Not Available		0.32	No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	1.649	2.135	2.433	No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	69	61	112	No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	1.817	1.591	2.999	No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	0	1	2.368	No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	0	0.7155	0.8107	No Different than National Benchmark	The best result, shared by 19% of US hospitals
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	Not Available		0.2606
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	Not Available		3.273
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	8	38	73.49
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	0.067	0.328	0.6136
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	0	0	0.5911
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	Not Available		0.7863
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	Not Available		0.3103
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	Not Available		2.305
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	24,635	14,451	52,601
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	0.932	0.567	3.111
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	1	0	2.166
MRSA Bacteremia2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	Not Available		0.7784
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	0.571	0.127	0.1925	No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	1.71	0.747	0.9502	No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	24,635	13,646	48,317	No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	12.67	5.683	27.04	No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	13	2	9.99	No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30	1.026	0.279	0.383	No Different than National Benchmark	Worse than 95% of US hospitals

Patient survey (HCAHPS)68 measures

How recent inpatients answered each survey question, with CMS's star rating per topic.

Measure	This hospital	US median	CA average	US rank
Room was "always" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	64	73	72.2	Worse than 85% of US hospitals
Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	13	8	8.78	Worse than 81% of US hospitals
Room was "usually" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	23	18	19.02
Cleanliness - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	83	87	86.82	Worse than 77% of US hospitals
Cleanliness - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	3	4	3.514	Worse than 53% of US hospitals
Nurses "always" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	73	80	75.76	Worse than 87% of US hospitals
Nurse communication - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	88	91	89.84	Worse than 88% of US hospitals
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	7	4	5.713	Worse than 86% of US hospitals
Nurse communication - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	2	3	2.855	Worse than 79% of US hospitals
Nurses "usually" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	20	16	18.53
Doctors "always" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	73	79	75.81	Worse than 87% of US hospitals
Doctor communication - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	88	91	89.11	Worse than 83% of US hospitals
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	7	5	7.043	Worse than 72% of US hospitals
Doctor communication - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	2	3	2.688	Worse than 71% of US hospitals
Doctors "usually" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	20	16	17.15
Staff "always" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	52	61	58.95	Worse than 93% of US hospitals
Communication about medicines - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	69	77	75.75	Worse than 95% of US hospitals
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	28	19	21.56	Worse than 94% of US hospitals
Communication about medicines - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	1	3	2.449	The lowest rating, shared by 7% of US hospitals
Staff "usually" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	20	19	19.48
Discharge information - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	83	86	84.61	Worse than 74% of US hospitals
No, staff "did not" give patients this information2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	17	13	15.03	Worse than 79% of US hospitals
Discharge information - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	3	3	3.08	Worse than 45% of US hospitals
Yes, staff "did" give patients this information2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	83	87	84.97	Worse than 79% of US hospitals
No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	20	14	16.39	Worse than 84% of US hospitals
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	80	86	83.61	Worse than 84% of US hospitals
Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	69	74	70.69	Worse than 81% of US hospitals
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	9	7	8.855	Worse than 75% of US hospitals
Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	22	19	20.45
Doctors "always" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	71	77	73.94	Worse than 86% of US hospitals
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	7	6	7.637	Worse than 64% of US hospitals
Doctors "usually" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	22	17	18.43
Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	78	85	81.99	Worse than 92% of US hospitals
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	5	3	4.958	Worse than 73% of US hospitals
Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	17	11	13.06
Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	13	8	10.01	Worse than 85% of US hospitals
Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	25	20	22.36
Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	62	72	67.63	Worse than 84% of US hospitals
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	84	88	86.85	Worse than 85% of US hospitals
Overall hospital rating - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	2	3	3.047	Worse than 78% of US hospitals
Staff "always" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	65	74	72.06	Worse than 94% of US hospitals
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	17	9	10.94	Worse than 96% of US hospitals
Staff "usually" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	18	16	17
Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	70	75	71.11	Worse than 80% of US hospitals
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	10	5	7.488	Worse than 91% of US hospitals
Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	20	20	21.4
Nurses "always" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	68	77	72.49	Worse than 91% of US hospitals
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	7	4	6.121	Worse than 81% of US hospitals
Nurses "usually" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	25	19	21.39
Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	81	86	82.8	Worse than 83% of US hospitals
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	4	3	3.779	Worse than 72% of US hospitals
Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	15	11	13.42
"Always" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	37	59	47.5	Worse than 98% of US hospitals
"Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	24	9	17.79	Worse than 97% of US hospitals
"Usually" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	39	31	34.71
Quietness - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	69	82	74.85	Worse than 97% of US hospitals
Quietness - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	1	3	2.203	The lowest rating, shared by 4% of US hospitals
"NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	10	5	7.623	Worse than 87% of US hospitals
"YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	63	71	68.6	Worse than 79% of US hospitals
Recommend hospital - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	83	87	85.85	Worse than 80% of US hospitals
"YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	27	23	23.77
Recommend hospital - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	3	4	3.431	Worse than 58% of US hospitals
Staff "always" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	39	47	45.33	Worse than 89% of US hospitals
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	40	30	32.51	Worse than 92% of US hospitals
Staff "usually" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	21	22	22.16
Summary star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	2	3	2.859	Worse than 81% of US hospitals
No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	13	12	13.94	Worse than 52% of US hospitals
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 582 cases	87	88	86.06	Worse than 52% of US hospitals

Timely and effective care30 measures

How often the hospital gave recommended care, and how fast.

Measure	This hospital	US median	CA average	US rank
Emergency department volume2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	high
Global Malnutrition Composite Score2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	Not Available
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Diagnosis Documented2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	Not Available
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Risk Screening2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	Not Available
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutrition Assessment2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	Not Available
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutritional Care Plan2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	Not Available
Hospital Harm - Severe Hyperglycemia2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	Not Available		8.289
Hospital Harm - Severe Hypoglycemia2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 1,609 cases	0	1	1.008	The best result, shared by 34% of US hospitals
Hospital Harm - Opioid Related Adverse Events2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	Not Available		0.1852
Healthcare workers given influenza vaccination2024-10-01 to 2025-03-31 · 2,496 cases	65	79	69.96	Worse than 71% of US hospitals
Average (median) time all patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, including psychiatric/mental health patients and patients who were transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 399 cases	163	154	187	Worse than 56% of US hospitals
Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, excluding patients transferred to another facility or psychiatric care/mental health patients. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 379 cases	160	148	182	Worse than 58% of US hospitals
Average (median) time psychiatric/mental health patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 12 cases	388	247	282	Worse than 86% of US hospitals
Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before being transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 13 cases	664	293	411	Worse than 99% of US hospitals
Left before being seen2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 41,846 cases	0	1	2.162	The best result, shared by 23% of US hospitals
Head CT results2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 11 cases	45	74	75.06	Worse than 89% of US hospitals
Endoscopy/polyp surveillance: appropriate follow-up interval for normal colonoscopy in average risk patients2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 107 cases	98	97	92.55	Better than 54% of US hospitals
Improvement in Patient's Visual Function within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	Not Available		80
ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	Not Available		48.75
Safe Use of Opioids - Concurrent Prescribing2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 1,064 cases	19	15	13.67	Worse than 80% of US hospitals
Appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shock2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 154 cases	75	65	68.8	Better than 73% of US hospitals
Septic Shock 3-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 27 cases	63	73	76.38	Worse than 70% of US hospitals
Septic Shock 6-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 14 cases	86	88	86.64	Worse than 57% of US hospitals
Severe Sepsis 3-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 155 cases	85	82	82.89	Better than 60% of US hospitals
Severe Sepsis 6-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 69 cases	97	94	93.98	Better than 69% of US hospitals
Discharged on Antithrombotic Therapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 66 cases	92	98	93.4	Worse than 89% of US hospitals
Anticoagulation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	Not Available		70.68
Antithrombotic Therapy by End of Hospital Day 22024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 64 cases	84	94	89.93	Worse than 95% of US hospitals
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	Not Available		86.9
Intensive Care Unit Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	Not Available		94.78

Outpatient imaging2 measures

How often scans were ordered when they may not be needed; lower is better.

Measure	This hospital	US median	CA average	CMS comparison	US rank
Abdomen CT Use of Contrast Material2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30	2.8	5	4.959		Better than 77% of US hospitals
Breast Cancer Screening Recall Rates2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30	18.4	6.6	8.417		Worse than 95% of US hospitals

Medicare spending per patient1 measure

Medicare spending around an inpatient stay compared with the US (1 is the US median).

Measure	This hospital	US median	CA average	CMS comparison	US rank
Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary)2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31	1.16	0.99	1.024		Worse than 96% of US hospitals

Value-based purchasing scores9 measures

The scores Medicare uses to raise or lower inpatient payments; higher is better.

Measure	This hospital	US median	CA average	US rank
VBP clinical outcomes domain scoreFY 2026	10	20	30.07	Worse than 70% of US hospitals
VBP clinical outcomes weighted domain scoreFY 2026	2.5	5	7.571	Worse than 70% of US hospitals
VBP efficiency and cost reduction domain scoreFY 2026	0	10	16.48	The worst result, shared by 43% of US hospitals
VBP efficiency and cost reduction weighted domain scoreFY 2026	0	2.5	4.567	The worst result, shared by 43% of US hospitals
VBP person and community engagement domain scoreFY 2026	10	34	28.67	Worse than 96% of US hospitals
VBP person and community engagement weighted domain scoreFY 2026	2.5	8.75	7.519	Worse than 96% of US hospitals
VBP safety domain scoreFY 2026	60	40	45.16	Better than 81% of US hospitals
VBP safety weighted domain scoreFY 2026	15	10	11.79	Better than 79% of US hospitals
VBP total performance scoreFY 2026	20	29.5	30.43	Worse than 83% of US hospitals

By fiscal year	FY 2021	FY 2022	FY 2023	FY 2024	FY 2025	FY 2026
VBP clinical outcomes domain score	40	45	16.67	10	15	10
VBP clinical outcomes weighted domain score	10	11.25	4.167	2.5	3.75	2.5
VBP efficiency and cost reduction domain score	0	Not Available	0	0	0	0
VBP efficiency and cost reduction weighted domain score	0	Not Available	0	0	0	0
VBP person and community engagement domain score	18	Not Available	Not Available	12	5	10
VBP person and community engagement weighted domain score	4.5	Not Available	Not Available	3	1.25	2.5
VBP safety domain score	22.5	Not Available	Not Available	54	48	60
VBP safety weighted domain score	5.625	Not Available	Not Available	13.5	12	15
VBP total performance score	20.13	Not Available	Not Available	19	17	20

Readmissions Reduction Program6 measures

Excess readmission ratios by condition; above 1 means more readmissions than expected.

Measure	This hospital	US median	CA average	US rank
READM-30-AMI-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30	N/A		1.015
READM-30-CABG-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30	N/A		1.005
READM-30-COPD-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30	0.944	0.9969	1.002	Better than 92% of US hospitals
READM-30-HF-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 124 cases	1.015	0.9983	1.017	Worse than 61% of US hospitals
READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30	N/A		0.9788
READM-30-PN-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 244 cases	0.941	0.9955	1.026	Better than 84% of US hospitals

By fiscal year	FY 2021	FY 2022	FY 2023	FY 2024	FY 2025	FY 2026
READM-30-AMI-HRRP	0.9721	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
READM-30-CABG-HRRP	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
READM-30-COPD-HRRP	1.02	1.039	0.9915	0.9918	0.9217	0.944
READM-30-HF-HRRP	1.036	1.035	1.085	0.9768	1.025	1.015
READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
READM-30-PN-HRRP	1.135	1.091	1.057	0.9876	0.98	0.941

Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program8 measures

Infection ratios, the PSI 90 composite and the total score Medicare ranks hospitals on; lower is better.

Measure	This hospital	US median	CA average	US rank
CAUTI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31	0.156	0.489	0.6114	Better than 82% of US hospitals
CDI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31	0.918	0.346	0.449	Worse than 94% of US hospitals
CLABSI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31	0	0.559	0.679	The best result, shared by 14% of US hospitals
HAC Reduction Program payment reductionFY 2026	No
MRSA standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31	1.431	0.6405	0.7204	Worse than 90% of US hospitals
Patient safety and adverse events composite (PSI 90)2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30	1.165	0.9628	0.9656	Worse than 87% of US hospitals
SSI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31	0.458	0.7945	0.8116	Better than 72% of US hospitals
Total HAC scoreFY 2026	0.3057	-0.0453	0.02733	Worse than 71% of US hospitals

By fiscal year	FY 2021	FY 2022	FY 2023	FY 2024	FY 2025	FY 2026
HAC Reduction Program payment reduction	Yes	Yes	N/A	No	Yes	No
Total HAC score	0.5262	0.7151	0	0.2262	0.3925	0.3057

Source: CMS Care Compare hospital files, latest release 2026-09-30, with program results for earlier fiscal years from CMS's archived snapshots. US medians and ranks count every hospital CMS reports; state averages are plain means of the state's reporting hospitals, not CMS's patient-weighted state rates.

Accreditation and services

The Joint Commission (since 2017)
Accreditation
None
Medical school affiliation
Private (not for profit)
Ownership type
106
Medicare-certified beds
130
Registered nurses (full-time equivalent)
1973
In Medicare since

27 services at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital

Intensive care: Neonatal ICU (Neonatal Intensive Care Unit)Pediatric ICUSurgical ICU (Medical Surgical Intensive Care Unit)Surgical ICU (Surgical Intensive Care Unit)
Heart: Cardiac Catheterization Lab
Surgery: Inpatient SurgicalOR (Operating Room)Outpatient SurgeryPostoperative Recovery Room
Imaging: Diagnostic RadiologyNuclear MedicineTherapeutic Radiology
Transplant and dialysis: Acute Renal DialysisOrgan Transplantation
Women and children: Neonatal NurseryObstetrics / Child BirthPediatric Care
Rehabilitation and therapy: AudiologyOT (Occupational Therapy)PT (Physical Therapy)Respiratory CareSpeech Pathology
Other services: Dietary CareESWL (Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripter)OutpatientPharmacySocial Care

Source: CMS Provider of Services file, as reported by the hospital and state surveyors.

Size and patient volume

What Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital reported to Medicare in its latest cost report, covering Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025.

5,283
Inpatient discharges
Medicare 30%, Medicaid 3%
24,404
Inpatient days
64% of available bed days used
514
Employees (full-time equivalent)
0
Interns and residents (full-time equivalent)

Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS) (report 839376). Figures cover the reporting period, which is not always 12 months, and are self-reported.

Utilization by payer and unit

Inpatient days and discharges Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital reported by payer. Medicare and Medicaid include their managed care plans, shown separately below.

	Medicare	Medicaid	Other	Total
Inpatient days	7,522	734	16,148	24,404
Discharges	1,559	141	3,583	5,283
Average length of stay	4.8 days	5.2 days	4.5 days	4.6 days
Average daily census	20.6	2.0	44.2	66.9

7,691
Medicare Advantage days
1,480 discharges
4,949
Medicaid managed care days
1,533
Observation bed days

Beds and days by unit

Unit	Beds	Inpatient days	Medicare days	Occupancy
Adults & pediatrics	87	20,781	6,335	65%
Intensive care unit	18	3,623	1,187	55%

Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 839376, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Worksheet S-3 Part I.

Medicare inpatient stays

What Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital treats Medicare patients for most often, in 2024. 884 Medicare discharges in 32 published DRGs; 3% surgical; 78% in DRGs with complications (CC or MCC).

Condition or procedure	Discharges	Average charges	Average Medicare payment	Estimated cost	DRG weight
Septicemia or severe sepsis without MV >96 hours with MCCMS-DRG 871, medical	194	$94,379	$17,373	$15,761	1.98
Heart failure and shock with MCCMS-DRG 291, medical	53	$57,022	$10,916	$9,523	1.28
Simple pneumonia and pleurisy with MCCMS-DRG 193, medical	52	$76,604	$11,756	$12,793	1.33
Respiratory infections and inflammations with MCCMS-DRG 177, medical	45	$83,346	$15,017	$13,919	1.70
Septicemia or severe sepsis with MV >96 hoursMS-DRG 870, medical	35	$195,189	$47,434	$32,597	6.96
Acute myocardial infarction, discharged alive with MCCMS-DRG 280, medical	34	$100,946	$12,811	$16,858	1.59
Miscellaneous disorders of nutrition, metabolism, fluids and electrolytes with MCCMS-DRG 640, medical	31	$64,765	$11,662	$10,816	1.32
Septicemia or severe sepsis without MV >96 hours without MCCMS-DRG 872, medical	27	$53,909	$8,915	$9,003	1.03
Chest painMS-DRG 313, medical	26	$34,243	$6,370	$5,719	0.72
Renal failure with MCCMS-DRG 682, medical	26	$82,587	$13,182	$13,792	1.50
Cardiac arrhythmia and conduction disorders with CCMS-DRG 309, medical	22	$41,969	$6,431	$7,009	0.74
Kidney and urinary tract infections without MCCMS-DRG 690, medical	22	$40,757	$6,865	$6,806	0.81
Other circulatory system diagnoses with MCCMS-DRG 314, medical	21	$97,832	$17,734	$16,338	2.09
Renal failure with CCMS-DRG 683, medical	20	$53,554	$7,411	$8,943	0.90
Esophagitis, gastroenteritis and miscellaneous digestive disorders without MCCMS-DRG 392, medical	19	$41,251	$7,064	$6,889	0.79
Miscellaneous disorders of nutrition, metabolism, fluids and electrolytes without MCCMS-DRG 641, medical	19	$37,578	$6,630	$6,275	0.78
Kidney and urinary tract infections with MCCMS-DRG 689, medical	17	$53,843	$10,337	$8,992	1.17
Other kidney and urinary tract diagnoses with MCCMS-DRG 698, medical	17	$101,507	$14,751	$16,952	1.65
Red blood cell disorders with MCCMS-DRG 811, medical	17	$73,025	$12,200	$12,195	1.40
Infectious and parasitic diseases with o.r. procedures with MCCMS-DRG 853, surgical	17	$182,363	$42,410	$30,455	5.00

See all 32 Medicare inpatient DRGs at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital

Source: CMS Medicare Inpatient Hospitals by Provider and Service (2024 data, released 2026-04-10), traditional Medicare only; CMS omits DRGs with fewer than 11 discharges. Estimated cost is average charges times the hospital's Medicare cost-to-charge ratio from the IPPS Impact File. Weights are the MS-DRG relative weights for the same year.

Medicare outpatient services

The comprehensive outpatient service groups (APCs) Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital billed Medicare for most in 2024: 382 services in all.

Service group	Services	Patients	Average charges	Average Medicare payment	US average payment
Level 5 Urology and Related ServicesAPC 5375	74	70	$33,282	$4,932	$3,918
Level 1 Intraocular ProceduresAPC 5491	63	48	$22,810	$2,239	$1,752
Level 4 Urology and Related ServicesAPC 5374	56	47	$27,037	$3,353	$2,629
Comprehensive Observation ServicesAPC 8011	45	45	$30,085	$2,677	$2,090
Level 1 Abdominal/Peritoneal/Biliary and Related ProceduresAPC 5341	28	28	$20,345	$3,382	$2,636
Level 3 Urology and Related ServicesAPC 5373	27	27	$22,768	$1,921	$1,516
Level 1 Laparoscopy and Related ServicesAPC 5361	22	22	$29,239	$5,635	$4,358
Level 8 Urology and Related ServicesAPC 5378	18	18	$91,290	$23,087	$17,428
Level 2 Excision/ Biopsy/ Incision and DrainageAPC 5072	15	15	$12,523	$1,563	$1,220
Level 2 Upper GI ProceduresAPC 5302	12	12	$14,171	$1,883	$1,445

See all 12 Medicare outpatient services at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital

Source: CMS Medicare Outpatient Hospitals by Provider and Service (2024 data, released 2026-06-24), comprehensive APCs for traditional Medicare; CMS omits services with fewer than 11 claims. The US average weights every hospital by its services.

Where patients come from

ZIP codes with the most Medicare inpatient stays at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital in 2025. Market share is this hospital's part of every hospital's Medicare stays from the ZIP code. Its published Medicare stays went from 2,155 in 2020 to 2,619 in 2025.

ZIP code	Stays	Of this hospital's stays	Days	Charges	Market share	Share in 2020
91702	599	23%	2,882	$48.4M	38%	35%
91741	466	18%	2,146	$34.8M	49%	46%
91740	436	17%	2,116	$34M	35%	32%
91773	186	7%	917	$14.9M	12%	13%
91724	133	5%	657	$10.4M	15%	17%
91750	129	5%	617	$9.7M	8%	11%
91010	112	4%	570	$9.4M	11%	7%
91722	101	4%	457	$7.5M	9%	10%
91790	56	2%	225	$3.9M	4%	3%
91706	52	2%	281	$4.7M	3%	3%
91723	41	2%	225	$4M	7%	9%
91016	31	1%	194	$3.2M	3%	2%
91791	31	1%	113	$1.9M	3%	3%
91793	27	1%	133	$2.5M	6%	6%
91711	25	1%	104	$1.5M	2%	2%
91766	24	1%	94	$1.4M	1%	1%
91744	23	1%	98	$1.8M	1%	2%
91789	23	1%	142	$2.5M	2%	2%
91767	18	1%	86	$1.5M	1%	2%
91746	16	1%	100	$1.7M	2%	2%
91768	16	1%	90	$1.6M	2%	3%
91765	15	1%	73	$1.3M	1%
91732	13	0%	51	$756,972	1%	1%
91792	13	0%	77	$1.3M	2%	4%
91001	11	0%	52	$966,186	1%

Source: CMS Hospital Service Area file. Shares are of the 2,619 stays from ZIP codes CMS publishes; it omits ZIP codes with fewer than 11 stays, so market shares count published stays only.

Staff and facilities

Staff by profession and the rooms and units Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital reported at its latest Medicare certification survey (2017). Counts are people, not full-time equivalents.

130
Registered nurses
27
Licensed practical nurses
6
Pharmacists
11
Respiratory therapists
8
Physical therapists
1
Occupational therapists
1
Speech pathologists and audiologists
1
Radiology technicians
1
Nuclear medicine technicians
3
Dietitians
1
Social workers
251
Other personnel

Source: CMS Provider of Services file.

Doctors and clinicians

309 clinicians who bill Medicare list Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital as a hospital affiliation. Showing 24 of them. Book a demo to see the commercial rates insurers publish for them, or start a free trial.

Internal Medicine Physician 49
Family Medicine Physician 31
Emergency Medicine Physician 29
Diagnostic Radiology Physician 20
Anesthesiology Physician 11
Hospitalist Physician 10
Nephrology Physician 10
Urology Physician 9
Gastroenterology Physician 8
Interventional Cardiology Physician 8

Samy Metyas, MD
Rheumatology Physician
NPI 1831104694
See commercial rates for Samy Metyas, MD
Robert Baker, MD
Family Medicine Physician
NPI 1033107750
See commercial rates for Robert Baker, MD
Christakis Christodoulou, M.D.
Interventional Cardiology Physician
NPI 1043396732
See commercial rates for Christakis Christodoulou, M.D.
Reza Dehdari, M.D.
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1508024126
See commercial rates for Reza Dehdari, M.D.
Sharon Yegiaian, M.D.
Neurology Physician
NPI 1225226301
See commercial rates for Sharon Yegiaian, M.D.
Amarpaul Sidhu, M.D
Specialist
NPI 1396713822
See commercial rates for Amarpaul Sidhu, M.D
Nilesh Patel, MD
Infectious Disease Physician
NPI 1508858903
See commercial rates for Nilesh Patel, MD
Roshan Patel, M.D.
Rheumatology Physician
NPI 1457709131
See commercial rates for Roshan Patel, M.D.
Sabah Kadhium, MD
Family Medicine Physician
NPI 1306836770
See commercial rates for Sabah Kadhium, MD
Naji Kandalaft, M.D.
Interventional Cardiology Physician
NPI 1578577813
See commercial rates for Naji Kandalaft, M.D.
Saad Farooq, D.O.
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1013442342
See commercial rates for Saad Farooq, D.O.
Shahnawaz Jaffer, M.D.
Gastroenterology Physician
NPI 1649301698
See commercial rates for Shahnawaz Jaffer, M.D.
Brian Leberthon, M.D.
Hematology & Oncology Physician
NPI 1326023979
See commercial rates for Brian Leberthon, M.D.
Kamalakar Rambhatla, MD
Pulmonary Disease Physician
NPI 1932130663
See commercial rates for Kamalakar Rambhatla, MD
Krunal Mehta, M.D.
Family Medicine Physician
NPI 1982867602
See commercial rates for Krunal Mehta, M.D.
Hyoung Oh
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1982090783
See commercial rates for Hyoung Oh
Kenneth York, M.D.
Ophthalmology Physician
NPI 1396819983
See commercial rates for Kenneth York, M.D.
Dharmesh Mehta, MD
Interventional Pain Medicine Physician
NPI 1114980760
See commercial rates for Dharmesh Mehta, MD
Salar Hakham, D.O.
Vascular & Interventional Radiology Physician
NPI 1386960854
See commercial rates for Salar Hakham, D.O.
Anil Gupta, MD
Internal Medicine Physician
NPI 1538182407
See commercial rates for Anil Gupta, MD
Claire Burton, MD
Urology Physician
NPI 1841685401
See commercial rates for Claire Burton, MD
Subhash Dhand, M.D.
Hematology & Oncology Physician
NPI 1497930903
See commercial rates for Subhash Dhand, M.D.
William Discepolo, M.D.
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician
NPI 1932308137
See commercial rates for William Discepolo, M.D.
Moustapha Abidali, DO
Pulmonary Disease Physician
NPI 1669810123
See commercial rates for Moustapha Abidali, DO

Source: CMS Doctors and Clinicians facility affiliations, released 2026-10-15, with names and specialties from NPPES. Affiliation means the clinician bills Medicare for care at this hospital; it is not employment.

Income statement

Revenue, expenses and income Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital reported to Medicare for Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025. Percentages are of net patient revenue.

Line	Amount	Share
Gross patient revenue (charges)	$837.4M	563.6%
Inpatient	$594.5M	400.2%
Outpatient	$242.9M	163.5%
Contractual allowances and discounts	-$688.8M	-463.6%
Net patient revenue	$148.6M	100.0%
Operating expenses	-$132.6M	-89.2%
Operating income from patient care	$16M	10.8%
Other income	$4.1M	2.8%
Contributions and donations	$89,115	0.1%
Investment income	$2.8M	1.9%
COVID-19 relief funding	$480,816	0.3%
Other	$750,085	0.5%
Other expenses	-$2	-0.0%
Net income	$20.1M	13.5%

Gross revenue by payer

Line	Amount	Share
Traditional Medicare	$127.6M	15.2%
Medicaid (including managed care)	$235.9M	28.2%
Other payers and self-pay	$473.9M	56.6%
Total charges	$837.4M	100.0%

Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 839376, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Traditional Medicare is the program charges on Worksheets D-3 and D Part V; Medicaid is from Worksheet S-10.

Financial ratios

Computed from Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital's latest cost report.

10.8%
Operating margin
Operating income from patient care / net patient revenue
13.2%
Total margin
Net income / net patient revenue plus other income
17.0%
EBITDAR margin
Net income before interest, depreciation and leases (Worksheet A-7), / total revenue
51% of expenses
Personnel costs
Salaries, direct-care contract labor and core wage-related costs / operating expenses
$50.25
Average hourly wage
Adjusted salaries / paid hours (Worksheet S-3 Part II)
11.1%
Return on assets
Net income for a year / total assets
11.9%
Return on equity
Net income for a year / fund balance
0.01
Long-term debt to fund balance
Mortgages, notes and loans / fund balance
5.96
Current ratio
Current assets / current liabilities
2.20
Quick ratio
Cash, temporary investments and net receivables / current liabilities
2 days
Days cash on hand
Cash and temporary investments / daily operating expenses excluding depreciation
54 days
Days in patient receivables
Net patient receivables / daily net patient revenue
29 days
Average payment period
Current liabilities / daily operating expenses excluding depreciation
0.84
Asset turnover
Total revenue for a year / total assets
16.7 years
Average age of plant
Accumulated depreciation / depreciation for a year

Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 839376, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.

Balance sheet

What Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital owned and owed at the end of its reporting period (Dec 2025), across all fund types: $181.4M in total assets and a $169.2M fund balance.

Show the balance sheet

Line	Amount	Of total assets
Cash and temporary investments	$580,761	0.3%
Patient receivables, net	$21.9M	12.1%
Inventory	$2.8M	1.5%
Total current assets	$61M	33.6%
Property and equipment, net of depreciation	$30.3M	16.7%
Investments and other assets	$90.1M	49.7%
Total assets	$181.4M	100.0%
Current liabilities	$10.2M	5.6%
Long-term debt	$1.9M	1.0%
Total liabilities	$12.1M	6.7%
Fund balance (net assets)	$169.2M	93.3%

Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 839376, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.

Charity care and uncompensated care

Care Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital provided without full payment, as reported on Worksheet S-10 of its cost report.

$2M
Cost of charity care
Care for patients approved for charity care and uninsured discounts, at cost
$22.1M
Bad debt
Patient bills written off as uncollectible, at charges
$4.8M
Medicaid shortfall
Cost of Medicaid patients (charges times the cost-to-charge ratio) minus Medicaid payments; negative means a surplus
$10.1M
Total unreimbursed and uncompensated care
7.6% of operating expenses
Medicaid, CHIP and indigent care shortfalls plus charity care and the cost of bad debt (Worksheet S-10 line 31)

Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 839376, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.

Financial trend

Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital's full-year cost reports, by fiscal year end. Reports shorter than ten months are left out.

Show 6 years

Fiscal year ending	Dec 2020	Dec 2021	Dec 2022	Dec 2023	Dec 2024	Dec 2025
Net patient revenue	$106.4M	$119.1M	$117.6M	$115M	$140.3M	$148.6M
Operating expenses	$108.3M	$109.5M	$115.4M	$118.2M	$134.2M	$132.6M
Operating margin	-1.8%	8.0%	1.9%	-2.7%	4.3%	10.8%
Net income	$7.8M	$20.9M	-$4.2M	$7.1M	$12.2M	$20.1M
Total assets	$127.7M	$141.4M	$140.7M	$156.6M	$168.8M	$181.4M
Discharges	4,481	4,536	4,795	4,878	5,444	5,283
Inpatient days	25,077	24,197	25,635	25,280	28,061	24,404
Medicare Advantage days	6,986	7,506	9,009	8,516	8,750	7,691
Beds	105	105	105	105	105	105
Employees (FTE)	490	476	492	487	528	514

Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 839376, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.

Departments

Each cost center Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital reports, largest first. Total cost includes its share of overhead; the cost-to-charge ratio is total cost / charges.

Show all 34 departments

Ancillary and outpatient departments

Department	Salaries	Total cost	Charges	Cost-to-charge	Square feet
Emergency	$7.4M	$14.4M	$169.9M	0.09	9,900
Medical supplies charged to patient		$11.7M	$13.9M	0.84
Operating room	$3.6M	$9.9M	$55.5M	0.18	16,465
Drugs charged to patients		$7.5M	$69.5M	0.11
Laboratory	$2.8M	$6.5M	$115.3M	0.06	3,171
Radiology-diagnostic	$3M	$5.7M	$58M	0.10	4,116
Impl. dev. charged to patients		$5.2M	$9.8M	0.53
Respiratory therapy	$2.3M	$3.7M	$24.2M	0.15	560
Physical therapy	$1.5M	$2.4M	$18.7M	0.13	117
Mri / ct scan	$1.1M	$2.2M	$115.1M	0.02	2,281
Observation beds (non-distinct part		$2M	$13.8M	0.15
Gi lab	$873,212	$1.8M	$11.9M	0.15	1,882
Electrocardiology	$589,594	$1.1M	$29.5M	0.04	1,286
Blood storing processing & trans.		$1.1M	$1.8M	0.60	576
Renal dialysis		$976,628	$2.4M	0.42
Electroencephalography		$45,136	$438,795	0.10
Anesthesiology		$22,179	$5.5M	0.00	200

Inpatient units

Department	Salaries	Total cost	Charges	Cost-to-charge	Square feet
Adults & pediatrics	$14.6M	$29.6M	$92.4M	0.32	26,736
Intensive care unit	$4.7M	$9.9M	$29.7M	0.33	5,985

Overhead (general service) departments

Department	Salaries	Direct cost	Paid hours	Average hourly wage	Square feet
Administrative & general	$3.4M	$18.3M	98,754	$32.18	28,171
Cap rel costs-mvble equip		$4.6M
Operation of plant	$1.2M	$4M	35,378	$33.15	9,086
Nursing administration	$1.4M	$2.6M	25,039	$57.42	871
Pharmacy	$1.9M	$2.3M	28,478	$65.32	863
Housekeeping	$1.2M	$2.2M	46,171	$25.08	883
Central services & supply	$573,154	$1.7M	20,975	$27.33	2,073
Dietary	$1.5M	$1.6M	34,849	$28.67	3,239
Cap rel costs-bldg & fixt		$1.6M			125,583
Laundry & linen service	$68,455	$527,344	2,414	$28.35	464
Cafeteria		$408,705	16,451	$28.67	4,421
Social service		$219,220	3,395	$56.05	252
Employee benefits department	$80,868	$85,012	1,600	$50.55
I&r services-other prgm costs apprv		$4,806
I&r services-salary & fringes apprv		$4,790

Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 839376, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Worksheets A, B-1, C Part I and S-3 Part II.

Medicare payment profile

The factors Medicare uses to set what it pays Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital for an inpatient stay.

1.74
Case mix index
Higher than 56% of hospitals paid under Medicare IPPS
Average Medicare DRG weight of its inpatient cases (FY 2027); higher means more complex, costlier care.
Teaching hospital
Teaching status
0.00 residents per bed
Medicare-funded interns and residents per bed (FY 2027).
36.9%
Low-income patient share
Disproportionate share percentage: Medicaid and SSI patient days CMS uses for safety-net payments (FY 2027).
1,556
Medicare inpatient stays
Medicare claims CMS based FY 2027 payment rates on.
Urban (metro area)
Location type
Geographic area CMS assigns before any wage index reclassification (FY 2027).

Show FY 2021 to FY 2027

IPPS fiscal year	FY 2021	FY 2022	FY 2023	FY 2024	FY 2025	FY 2026	FY 2027
Case mix index	1.50	1.50	1.80	1.69	1.73	1.65	1.74
Wage index	1.290	1.284	1.297	1.519	1.451	1.431	1.399
Readmissions adjustment	-0.54%	-0.77%	-0.58%	-0.17%	0.00%	-0.01%	0.00%
Value-based purchasing adjustment	-0.31%	-0.71%	-0.71%	-0.60%	-0.20%	-0.48%	-0.62%
Medicare inpatient stays	1,234	1,234	1,078	1,139	1,200	1,373	1,556

Source: CMS IPPS final rule Impact File (FY 2027).

Ownership

Organizations Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital reports to Medicare as owners or with operational control.

Emanate Health
5% or greater direct ownership interest, 100%, since 2018
Emanate Health
Operational/managerial control, 100%, since 2018

Sources: CMS Hospital All Owners.

Leadership

The officers and board members on Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital's Medicare enrollment and on the IRS Form 990 filed under its tax ID.

Officers and directors on the Medicare enrollment

Leon J. Choiniere Officer, since 2022
Rajesh K Sharma Officer, President/ceo, since 2022
Arthur Joseph Ludwick Director, since 2008
Bernard Bollinger Director, since 2008
Clifford Charles Christ Director, since 2008
Gary Mathewson Director, since 2008
Mary Kirchen Director, since 2008
Patsy Gorrell Director, since 2008
Thomas O. Bryan Director, since 2008
George Ferenczi Director, since 2016
Sharon Juliana Yee Director, since 2016
Lisa Fuerst Director, since 2019
Robert Gonzales Director, since 2019
Lucrecia Montes Director, since 2022
Eddie Arvayo Director, since 2023
Philip B Maldonado Director, since 2023
Sanjay Natverlal Khedia Director, since 2023
Brenda N Hayakawa Director, since 2024
Raffaele M Corbisiero Director, since 2024
Walter Allen Director, since 2024

Source: CMS Hospital All Owners (PECOS), the people the hospital lists on its Medicare enrollment; the first 20 of 21 are shown.

Officers and key employees (IRS Form 990, tax year 2024)

Name	Title
Rajesh Sharma	President & CEO
Leon Choinere	Chief Financial Officer
Bernard Bollinger Jr Esq	Treasurer
Clifford Christ	Chair
Gary Mathewson	Secretary
Patsy Gorrell	Vice Chair

Board members: Anna Leung MD, Arthur J Ludwick, Brenda Hayakawa MD Cos Ehfph, George Ferenczi MD, Lisa Fuerst, Lucrecia Montes Pharmd Ihm, Mary Kirchen Ihm, Philip Maldonado DDS, Raffaele Corbisiero MD Cos Ehmc, Robert Gonzales, Sanjay Khedia MD, Sharon Yee MD.

Source: IRS Form 990 Part VII filed by Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital (EIN 95-2413054), via the IRS e-file data. A health system's return can cover several hospitals.

Programs and facilities

Helipad
Foothill Presbyterian Hospital
FAA location ID 14CL, a medical-use heliport at the hospital.
Source: FAA National Airspace System Resource data, cycle 2026-10-01.

Frequently asked questions

About Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital's rates and hospital price transparency.

How much does a CT scan cost at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital?

For CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast (CPT 74177), published negotiated rates at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital range from $481 to $2,973 across 4 insurers. Aetna's rate is $1,183. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $907. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.

How much does a colonoscopy cost at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital?

For Colonoscopy with biopsy (CPT 45380), published negotiated rates at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital range from $2,556 to $4,291 across 4 insurers. Cigna's rate is $4,291. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $1,350. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.

How much does giving birth cost at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital?

For Vaginal delivery, hospital stay (MS-DRG 807), published negotiated rates at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital range from $7,851 to $14,700 across 4 insurers. UnitedHealthcare's rate is $10,559. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.

How much does a mammogram cost at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital?

For Screening mammography, bilateral (CPT 77067), published negotiated rates at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital range from $314 to $1,240 across 4 insurers. UnitedHealthcare's rate is $314. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $214. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.

What is Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital's CMS star rating?

Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital has a CMS overall hospital star rating of 3 out of 5 on Medicare Care Compare (CMS data released 2026-08-13). That is lower than 42% of US hospitals.

Is Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital a teaching hospital?

Yes. CMS counts 0.00 Medicare-funded residents per bed at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital for fiscal year 2027, so it is a teaching hospital.

Does Medicare penalize Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital for readmissions?

No. Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital has no Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program penalty in fiscal year 2027.

What are the most common Medicare inpatient stays at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital?

In 2024, the most common were septicemia or severe sepsis without mv >96 hours with mcc (194 discharges), heart failure and shock with mcc (53 discharges), simple pneumonia and pleurisy with mcc (52 discharges).

What is Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital's case mix index?

Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital's Medicare case mix index is 1.74 for fiscal year 2027, higher than 56% of hospitals paid under the inpatient prospective payment system.

How many patients does Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital admit?

Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital reported 5,283 inpatient discharges and 24,404 inpatient days from Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025.

For hospital finance and compliance teams

Running price transparency at a hospital like this one?

The data on this page comes from the files hospitals and payers publish. We help hospitals publish theirs correctly, and take a fresh look at their chargemaster.

Compliance MRF

Publish a CMS-compliant machine-readable file

We turn your chargemaster and payer contracts into the CMS template file, then keep it current as rates change.

CMS v3 example: standard_charge_information[0]

{
  "description": "MRI of brain (no contrast)",
  "code_information": [
    { "code": "611", "type": "RC" },
    { "code": "70551", "type": "CPT" }
  ],
  "standard_charges": [{
    "setting": "outpatient",
    "minimum": 250,
    "maximum": 400,
    "gross_charge": 1200,
    "discounted_cash": 1080,
    "payers_information": [
      {
        "payer_name": "Platform Health Insurance",
        "plan_name": "PPO",
        "methodology": "fee schedule",
        "standard_charge_dollar": 400
      },
      {
        "payer_name": "Region Health Insurance",
        "plan_name": "HMO",
        "methodology": "fee schedule",
        "standard_charge_dollar": 250
      }
    ]
  }]
}

CMS template layout, in JSON or CSV
Gross, discounted cash, payer-specific and de-identified min / max charges
cms-hpt.txt file and homepage footer link
Refreshed when your contracts change

Talk to us about your MRF

Chargemaster analysis

Get your chargemaster right for billing and payer contracts

Your chargemaster sets the gross charge on every claim, and many payer contracts base payment on it through percent-of-charge, lesser-of and stop-loss terms. We audit it line by line and show how your charges and negotiated rates compare with peer hospitals before your next negotiation.

What a review covers

CodingPricingPayer contractsCompliance

CPT, HCPCS, revenue code and modifier errors flagged line by line
Missing, duplicate and outdated charge lines identified
Charges set below payer allowables caught before lesser-of clauses cut payment
Revenue impact of charge changes modeled across percent-of-charge and stop-loss terms
Your negotiated rates benchmarked against peer hospitals for the same payers

Talk to us about your chargemaster

About this hospital

Prices for common services

How the insurers pay at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital

Insurance Accepted

More about this hospital

Tax IDs and NPIs insurers list

Location

Quality ratings (CMS Care Compare)

Medicare quality penalties and bonuses

Every CMS quality measure

Accreditation and services

27 services at Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital

Size and patient volume

Utilization by payer and unit

Beds and days by unit

Medicare inpatient stays

Medicare outpatient services

Where patients come from

Staff and facilities

Doctors and clinicians

Income statement

Gross revenue by payer

Financial ratios

Balance sheet

Charity care and uncompensated care

Financial trend

Departments

Ancillary and outpatient departments

Inpatient units

Overhead (general service) departments

Medicare payment profile

Ownership

Leadership

Officers and directors on the Medicare enrollment

Officers and key employees (IRS Form 990, tax year 2024)

Programs and facilities

Comparable hospitals nearby

Frequently asked questions

Running price transparency at a hospital like this one?

Publish a CMS-compliant machine-readable file

Get your chargemaster right for billing and payer contracts