CT imaging
CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast
CPT 74177
$350 - $1,660
from 4 insurers · median $1,198
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Prospect Medical Holdings · Tustin, CA
3 of 5
CMS star rating
153
Beds
4,778
Inpatient discharges a year
$98.8M
Net patient revenue a year
26
In-network payers
Foothill Regional Medical Center is a 153-bed proprietary hospital in Tustin, CA, affiliated with Prospect Medical Holdings. Below you'll find publicly disclosed negotiated rates and facility details, including 26 in-network payers and 276 disclosed rate categories.
The 24 services Foothill Regional Medical Center most likely performs, ranked by likely volume and what it is paid. Each service names one insurer. * marks hidden insurer names; A, B and C rank the remaining rates from low to high and reset for each service.
Book a demo to see hidden insurer names, more payer rates, and hospital data, or start a free trial.
CT imaging
CPT 74177
$350 - $1,660
from 4 insurers · median $1,198
Typical for a hospital with this service line
CT imaging
CPT 70450
$246 - $1,660
from 4 insurers · median $805
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Digestive procedures
CPT 43239
$2,181 - $4,848
from 4 insurers · median $2,450
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Digestive procedures
CPT 45385
$2,181 - $4,848
from 4 insurers · median $2,825
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Digestive procedures
CPT 45380
$2,181 - $4,848
from 4 insurers · median $2,857
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Mammography
CPT 77067
$110 - $1,827
from 4 insurers · median $290
Typical for a hospital with this service line
X-ray and bone density
CPT 71046
$82 - $263
from 3 insurers · median $251
Typical for a hospital with this service line
CT imaging
CPT 71275
$172 - $1,660
from 4 insurers · median $917
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Medicine & Surgery
CPT 66984
$3,273 - $8,059
from 4 insurers · median $5,553
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Cardiology and vascular testing
CPT 93306
$436 - $1,543
from 4 insurers · median $683
Typical for a hospital with this service line
CT imaging
CPT 71260
$468 - $1,827
from 4 insurers · median $917
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Medicine & Surgery
CPT 47562
$4,848 - $15,490
from 4 insurers · median $7,792
Typical for a hospital with this service line
MRI imaging
CPT 70553
$792 - $1,811
from 4 insurers · median $1,442
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Digestive procedures
CPT 45378
$2,181 - $4,848
from 4 insurers · median $2,440
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Nuclear imaging
CPT 78452
$1,260 - $3,996
from 4 insurers · median $2,377
Hospital reports nuclear medicine services to CMS
Gynecology
CPT 58571
$4,848 - $26,961
from 4 insurers · median $7,792
Typical for a hospital with this service line
MRI imaging
CPT 72148
$400 - $1,811
from 4 insurers · median $1,245
Typical for a hospital with this service line
MRI imaging
CPT 70551
$394 - $1,811
from 4 insurers · median $1,245
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Medicine & Surgery · Inpatient
MS-DRG 743
$18,646 - $24,953
from 3 insurers · median $19,088
Hospital reports inpatient surgical services to CMS
MRI imaging
CPT 73721
$396 - $1,827
from 4 insurers · median $1,279
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Ultrasound
CPT 76705
$108 - $1,017
from 4 insurers · median $356
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Ear, nose and throat
CPT 69436
$2,281 - $4,848
from 4 insurers · median $3,895
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Gynecology
CPT 58558
$3,321 - $7,274
from 4 insurers · median $4,200
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Orthopedics and pain
CPT 20610
$570 - $4,848
from 4 insurers · median $1,375
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Median rate as a percent of Medicare across the outpatient services above, and how many services sit above or below the same insurer's median at nearby hospitals. * marks hidden insurer names. These table labels track the same insurers across services; the labels on each service card reset.
| Insurer | Services | Median % of Medicare | Above nearby | Below nearby |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insurer A* | 22 | 488% | 18 | 4 |
| Insurer B* | 24 | 307% | 12 | 0 |
| Insurer C* | 24 | 282% | 18 | 3 |
| Insurer D* | 24 | 144% | 2 | 5 |
How we chose these services: 0 appear in this hospital's own Medicare claims, 0 are common here based on CMS Medicare volume, and 24 are typical for the service lines it reports to CMS. Rates come from insurer and hospital price transparency files as of October 2026. Rates under a quarter of Medicare or over 20 times Medicare are left out as likely physician-fee rows or file errors. Book a demo to see all 300 CMS shoppable services for Foothill Regional Medical Center, or start a free trial.
Acceptance varies by plan and service. Confirm coverage with your insurer or the hospital's billing department.





Quality
3 of 5 stars
Doctors and services
Accredited by The Joint Commission
Finances
$98.8M net patient revenue
Ownership and leadership
Owned by Astrana Care Hospital, LLC
The employer identification numbers (EINs) health plans and networks list for Foothill Regional Medical Center in the in-network rate files they publish, with the organization NPIs billed under each.
| Tax ID (EIN) | Plans and networks listing it | Organization NPIs |
|---|---|---|
| 30-0804393Foothill Regional Medical Center | 38Aetna, Cigna, United Healthcare (incl Optum, Rocky Mountain, Health Plan of Nevada, Sierra Health), Allied Benefit Systems, Ambetter and 33 more | 1043632938 Alta Newport Hospital LLC1689096406 Alta Newport Hospital LLC1710158498 On-line Radiology Medical Group Inc |
Source: PayerPrice analysis of insurers' Transparency in Coverage in-network files. An EIN can cover several hospitals and clinics in a health system, and insurers sometimes list other organizations' NPIs under it.
14662 Newport Avenue, Tustin, CA 92780
(714) 619-7700
How Foothill Regional Medical Center compares with other US facilities on the measures CMS publishes, mostly from Medicare patients.
Overall star rating
3 of 5
Lower than 42% of US hospitals
Combines death rates, safety, readmissions, patient experience and timely care
Death rates
Better on 1 of 3 measures
1 better, 2 no different, 0 worse than the US rate
Deaths within 30 days, such as after a heart attack, pneumonia or stroke
Safety
Better on 1 of 2 measures
1 better, 1 no different, 0 worse than the US rate
Infections, surgical complications and other harm in the hospital
Readmissions
Better on 1 of 4 measures
1 better, 3 no different, 0 worse than the US rate
Patients back in the hospital or ER soon after leaving
Patient survey rating
1 of 5
The lowest rating, shared by 2% of US hospitals
From the HCAHPS survey of recent inpatients
Would definitely recommend
44%
Lower than 99% of US hospitals
US median: 71%
Surveyed patients who would definitely recommend the hospital
Hospital-acquired condition penalty
Not penalized
Not among the worst-performing 25%
Medicare cuts payments 1% for the worst-performing 25% of hospitals on infections and injuries acquired in the hospital
Serious complications (PSI 90)
0.8
Lower than 93% of US hospitals
US median: 0.96
Risk-adjusted composite of complications such as bedsores, falls with hip fracture and blood clots after surgery; lower is better
Time in the ER before going home
155 min
Higher than 54% of US hospitals
US median: 148 min
Median minutes from arrival to leaving for ER patients who were sent home; lower is better
Sepsis care
31%
Lower than 96% of US hospitals
US median: 65%
Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock who got every step of the recommended early treatment; higher is better
| Measure | Result | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Overall star ratingCMS: Overall hospital quality star rating | 3 of 5 | |
| Death rates | Better on 1 of 3 measures | |
| Safety | Better on 1 of 2 measures | |
| Readmissions | Better on 1 of 4 measures | |
| Patient survey ratingCMS: Summary star rating | 1 of 5 | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
| Would definitely recommendCMS: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital | 44% | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
| Hospital-acquired condition penaltyCMS: HAC Reduction Program payment reduction | Not penalized | 2026 |
| Serious complications (PSI 90)CMS: Patient safety and adverse events composite (PSI 90) | 0.8 | 2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 |
| Time in the ER before going homeCMS: Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, excluding patients transferred to another facility or psychiatric care/mental health patients. A lower number of minutes is better | 155 min | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
| Sepsis careCMS: Appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shock | 31% | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, released 2026-08-13. US comparisons rank this facility among every facility CMS reports for each measure. See Medicare Care Compare.
How Medicare adjusts Foothill Regional Medical Center's inpatient payments for its readmissions, quality and cost results.
No penalty
Readmissions penalty
Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program adjustment for excess readmissions, as estimated in the FY 2027 IPPS final rule.
-0.14% on Medicare payments
Value-based purchasing
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing bonus or reduction for quality and cost, as estimated in the FY 2027 IPPS final rule.
Source: CMS IPPS final rule Impact File (FY 2027).
Each result CMS publishes for Foothill Regional Medical Center, beside the US median and the average of CA hospitals. The rank says what share of US hospitals the result is better or worse than; counts and confidence limits are not ranked.
Risk-adjusted 30-day death rates and surgical complications; lower is better.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients2023-04-01 to 2025-03-31 · 158 cases | 3.3 | 4.1 | 4.075 | Better than 85% of US hospitals | |
| Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 919 cases | 3.4 | 3.9 | 3.81 | Better than 79% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for heart attack patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 11.57 | |||
| Death rate for CABG surgery patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 2.379 | |||
| Death rate for COPD patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 8.235 | |||
| Death rate for heart failure patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 46 cases | 10.1 | 11 | 10.29 | Better than 67% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for pneumonia patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 161 cases | 11.1 | 15.2 | 14.49 | Better than 96% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for stroke patients2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 11.57 | |||
| Pressure ulcer rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 1,850 cases | 0.25 | 0.51 | 0.4818 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 86% of US hospitals |
| Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | Not Available | 171 | Number of Cases Too Small | ||
| Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 2,172 cases | 0.19 | 0.2 | 0.21 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 66% of US hospitals |
| In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 2,191 cases | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.261 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 71% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 199 cases | 2.21 | 2.29 | 2.308 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 65% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 59 cases | 1.66 | 1.63 | 1.668 | No Different Than the National Rate | Worse than 64% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative respiratory failure rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 65 cases | 6.96 | 8.88 | 9.555 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 85% of US hospitals |
| Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 205 cases | 3.08 | 3.4 | 3.521 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 77% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative sepsis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 54 cases | 5.13 | 5.105 | 5.495 | No Different Than the National Rate | Worse than 52% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative wound dehiscence rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 55 cases | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.796 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 48% of US hospitals |
| Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 256 cases | 1 | 1.02 | 1.061 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 57% of US hospitals |
Unplanned returns to a hospital after a stay or an outpatient procedure; lower is better.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital return days for heart attack patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 11.09 | |||
| Hospital return days for heart failure patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 61 cases | -98.7 | 1.25 | 7.901 | Better than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Hospital return days for pneumonia patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 189 cases | -27 | 3.85 | 16.67 | Better than 87% of US hospitals | |
| Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | ||||
| Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)2022-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 12.91 | Number of Cases Too Small | ||
| Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 11.39 | |||
| Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 5.546 | |||
| Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 1.001 | Number of cases too small | ||
| Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 14.43 | |||
| Rate of readmission for CABG2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 11.19 | |||
| Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 46 cases | 19.9 | 19.8 | 19.94 | Worse than 53% of US hospitals | |
| Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 124 cases | 20.8 | 21.3 | 21.41 | Better than 67% of US hospitals | |
| Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 168 cases | 4.6 | 5.8 | 5.612 | Better than 97% of US hospitals | |
| Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 270 cases | 17.5 | 17.2 | 17.7 | Worse than 60% of US hospitals |
Standardized infection ratios (1 is the US baseline) and the counts behind them; lower is better.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.2347 | |||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 1.834 | |||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 769 | 1,370 | 5,722 | ||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.492 | 0.9835 | 5.638 | ||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 0 | 3.347 | ||
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.5696 | |||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.2147 | |||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 1.749 | |||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1,364 | 1,799 | 5,308 | ||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.725 | 1.377 | 6.105 | ||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 0 | 3.273 | ||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.5366 | |||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.32 | |||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 2.433 | |||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 9 | 61 | 112 | ||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.259 | 1.591 | 2.999 | ||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 1 | 2.368 | ||
| SSI - Colon Surgery2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.8107 | |||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.2606 | |||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 3.273 | |||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 6 | 38 | 73.49 | ||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.041 | 0.328 | 0.6136 | ||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 0 | 0.5911 | ||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.7863 | |||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.3103 | |||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 2.305 | |||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 24,781 | 14,451 | 52,601 | ||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.679 | 0.567 | 3.111 | ||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 0 | 2.166 | ||
| MRSA Bacteremia2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.7784 | |||
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.004 | 0.127 | 0.1925 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.43 | 0.747 | 0.9502 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 24,781 | 13,646 | 48,317 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 11.47 | 5.683 | 27.04 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1 | 2 | 9.99 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.087 | 0.279 | 0.383 | Better than the National Benchmark | Better than 76% of US hospitals |
How recent inpatients answered each survey question, with CMS's star rating per topic.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Room was "always" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 67 | 73 | 72.2 | Worse than 75% of US hospitals | |
| Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 11 | 8 | 8.78 | Worse than 70% of US hospitals | |
| Room was "usually" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 22 | 18 | 19.02 | ||
| Cleanliness - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 84 | 87 | 86.82 | Worse than 71% of US hospitals | |
| Cleanliness - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 3 | 4 | 3.514 | Worse than 53% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "always" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 66 | 80 | 75.76 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Nurse communication - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 85 | 91 | 89.84 | Worse than 97% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 10 | 4 | 5.713 | Worse than 97% of US hospitals | |
| Nurse communication - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 1 | 3 | 2.855 | The lowest rating, shared by 4% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 24 | 16 | 18.53 | ||
| Doctors "always" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 66 | 79 | 75.81 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Doctor communication - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 84 | 91 | 89.11 | Worse than 98% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 10 | 5 | 7.043 | Worse than 94% of US hospitals | |
| Doctor communication - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 1 | 3 | 2.688 | The lowest rating, shared by 2% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 24 | 16 | 17.15 | ||
| Staff "always" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 51 | 61 | 58.95 | Worse than 94% of US hospitals | |
| Communication about medicines - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 70 | 77 | 75.75 | Worse than 93% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 26 | 19 | 21.56 | Worse than 88% of US hospitals | |
| Communication about medicines - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 1 | 3 | 2.449 | The lowest rating, shared by 7% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "usually" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 23 | 19 | 19.48 | ||
| Discharge information - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 75 | 86 | 84.61 | Worse than 98% of US hospitals | |
| No, staff "did not" give patients this information2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 25 | 13 | 15.03 | Worse than 98% of US hospitals | |
| Discharge information - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 1 | 3 | 3.08 | The lowest rating, shared by 4% of US hospitals | |
| Yes, staff "did" give patients this information2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 75 | 87 | 84.97 | Worse than 98% of US hospitals | |
| No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 23 | 14 | 16.39 | Worse than 93% of US hospitals | |
| Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 77 | 86 | 83.61 | Worse than 93% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 60 | 74 | 70.69 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 14 | 7 | 8.855 | Worse than 98% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 26 | 19 | 20.45 | ||
| Doctors "always" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 64 | 77 | 73.94 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 10 | 6 | 7.637 | Worse than 92% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 26 | 17 | 18.43 | ||
| Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 73 | 85 | 81.99 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 7 | 3 | 4.958 | Worse than 92% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 20 | 11 | 13.06 | ||
| Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 21 | 8 | 10.01 | Worse than 98% of US hospitals | |
| Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 32 | 20 | 22.36 | ||
| Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 47 | 72 | 67.63 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Overall hospital rating - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 77 | 88 | 86.85 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Overall hospital rating - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 1 | 3 | 3.047 | The lowest rating, shared by 2% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "always" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 63 | 74 | 72.06 | Worse than 97% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 14 | 9 | 10.94 | Worse than 87% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "usually" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 23 | 16 | 17 | ||
| Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 61 | 75 | 71.11 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 11 | 5 | 7.488 | Worse than 95% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 28 | 20 | 21.4 | ||
| Nurses "always" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 64 | 77 | 72.49 | Worse than 98% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 10 | 4 | 6.121 | Worse than 95% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 26 | 19 | 21.39 | ||
| Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 73 | 86 | 82.8 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 9 | 3 | 3.779 | Worse than 98% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 18 | 11 | 13.42 | ||
| "Always" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 33 | 59 | 47.5 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 32 | 9 | 17.79 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| "Usually" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 35 | 31 | 34.71 | ||
| Quietness - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 63 | 82 | 74.85 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Quietness - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 1 | 3 | 2.203 | The lowest rating, shared by 4% of US hospitals | |
| "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 19 | 5 | 7.623 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 44 | 71 | 68.6 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Recommend hospital - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 72 | 87 | 85.85 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 37 | 23 | 23.77 | ||
| Recommend hospital - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 1 | 4 | 3.431 | The lowest rating, shared by 3% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "always" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 39 | 47 | 45.33 | Worse than 89% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 39 | 30 | 32.51 | Worse than 89% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "usually" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 22 | 22 | 22.16 | ||
| Summary star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 1 | 3 | 2.859 | The lowest rating, shared by 2% of US hospitals | |
| No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 26 | 12 | 13.94 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 356 cases | 74 | 88 | 86.06 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals |
How often the hospital gave recommended care, and how fast.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emergency department volume2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | low | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Diagnosis Documented2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Risk Screening2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutrition Assessment2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutritional Care Plan2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Hospital Harm - Severe Hyperglycemia2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 8.289 | |||
| Hospital Harm - Severe Hypoglycemia2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 1.008 | |||
| Hospital Harm - Opioid Related Adverse Events2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 0.1852 | |||
| Healthcare workers given influenza vaccination2024-10-01 to 2025-03-31 · 444 cases | 83 | 79 | 69.96 | Better than 56% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time all patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, including psychiatric/mental health patients and patients who were transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 358 cases | 163 | 154 | 187 | Worse than 56% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, excluding patients transferred to another facility or psychiatric care/mental health patients. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 320 cases | 155 | 148 | 182 | Worse than 54% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time psychiatric/mental health patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 37 cases | 270 | 247 | 282 | Worse than 58% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before being transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 411 | |||
| Left before being seen2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 8,441 cases | 5 | 1 | 2.162 | Worse than 94% of US hospitals | |
| Head CT results2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 75.06 | |||
| Endoscopy/polyp surveillance: appropriate follow-up interval for normal colonoscopy in average risk patients2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 140 cases | 96 | 97 | 92.55 | Worse than 54% of US hospitals | |
| Improvement in Patient's Visual Function within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 80 | |||
| ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 48.75 | |||
| Safe Use of Opioids - Concurrent Prescribing2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 13.67 | |||
| Appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shock2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 32 cases | 31 | 65 | 68.8 | Worse than 96% of US hospitals | |
| Septic Shock 3-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 76.38 | |||
| Septic Shock 6-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 86.64 | |||
| Severe Sepsis 3-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 32 cases | 44 | 82 | 82.89 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Severe Sepsis 6-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 93.98 | |||
| Discharged on Antithrombotic Therapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 93.4 | |||
| Anticoagulation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 70.68 | |||
| Antithrombotic Therapy by End of Hospital Day 22024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 89.93 | |||
| Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 86.9 | |||
| Intensive Care Unit Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 94.78 |
How often scans were ordered when they may not be needed; lower is better.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdomen CT Use of Contrast Material2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 4.959 | |||
| Breast Cancer Screening Recall Rates2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 8.417 |
Medicare spending around an inpatient stay compared with the US (1 is the US median).
| Measure | This hospital | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary)2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 1.42 | 0.99 | 1.024 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals |
The scores Medicare uses to raise or lower inpatient payments; higher is better.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VBP clinical outcomes domain scoreFY 2026 | 55 | 20 | 30.07 | Better than 93% of US hospitals | |
| VBP clinical outcomes weighted domain scoreFY 2026 | 13.75 | 5 | 7.571 | Better than 93% of US hospitals | |
| VBP efficiency and cost reduction domain scoreFY 2026 | 0 | 10 | 16.48 | The worst result, shared by 43% of US hospitals | |
| VBP efficiency and cost reduction weighted domain scoreFY 2026 | 0 | 2.5 | 4.567 | The worst result, shared by 43% of US hospitals | |
| VBP person and community engagement domain scoreFY 2026 | 3 | 34 | 28.67 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| VBP person and community engagement weighted domain scoreFY 2026 | 0.75 | 8.75 | 7.519 | Worse than 99% of US hospitals | |
| VBP safety domain scoreFY 2026 | 50 | 40 | 45.16 | Better than 64% of US hospitals | |
| VBP safety weighted domain scoreFY 2026 | 12.5 | 10 | 11.79 | Better than 64% of US hospitals | |
| VBP total performance scoreFY 2026 | 27 | 29.5 | 30.43 | Worse than 59% of US hospitals |
| By fiscal year | FY 2025 | FY 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| VBP clinical outcomes domain score | 25 | 55 |
| VBP clinical outcomes weighted domain score | 8.333 | 13.75 |
| VBP efficiency and cost reduction domain score | 0 | 0 |
| VBP efficiency and cost reduction weighted domain score | 0 | 0 |
| VBP person and community engagement domain score | 1 | 3 |
| VBP person and community engagement weighted domain score | 0.3333 | 0.75 |
| VBP safety domain score | Not Available | 50 |
| VBP safety weighted domain score | Not Available | 12.5 |
| VBP total performance score | 8.667 | 27 |
Excess readmission ratios by condition; above 1 means more readmissions than expected.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| READM-30-AMI-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | N/A | 1.015 | |||
| READM-30-CABG-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | N/A | 1.005 | |||
| READM-30-COPD-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | N/A | 1.002 | |||
| READM-30-HF-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | 0.9771 | 0.9983 | 1.017 | Better than 65% of US hospitals | |
| READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | N/A | 0.9788 | |||
| READM-30-PN-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 179 cases | 0.975 | 0.9955 | 1.026 | Better than 64% of US hospitals |
| By fiscal year | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| READM-30-AMI-HRRP | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| READM-30-CABG-HRRP | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| READM-30-COPD-HRRP | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| READM-30-HF-HRRP | N/A | N/A | 0.9926 | 1.004 | 0.9761 | 0.9771 |
| READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| READM-30-PN-HRRP | 1.049 | 1.069 | 1.054 | 1.025 | 1.006 | 0.975 |
Infection ratios, the PSI 90 composite and the total score Medicare ranks hospitals on; lower is better.
| Measure | This hospital | US median | CA average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAUTI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0 | 0.489 | 0.6114 | The best result, shared by 14% of US hospitals | |
| CDI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0 | 0.346 | 0.449 | The best result, shared by 9% of US hospitals | |
| CLABSI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | N/A | 0.679 | |||
| HAC Reduction Program payment reductionFY 2026 | No | ||||
| MRSA standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0 | 0.6405 | 0.7204 | The best result, shared by 12% of US hospitals | |
| Patient safety and adverse events composite (PSI 90)2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | 0.7983 | 0.9628 | 0.9656 | Better than 93% of US hospitals | |
| SSI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0 | 0.7945 | 0.8116 | The best result, shared by 12% of US hospitals | |
| Total HAC scoreFY 2026 | -1.404 | -0.0453 | 0.02733 | Better than 99% of US hospitals |
| By fiscal year | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAC Reduction Program payment reduction | Yes | No | N/A | No | No | No |
| Total HAC score | 0.3599 | 0.1811 | 0 | -0.6619 | -1.307 | -1.404 |
Source: CMS Care Compare hospital files, latest release 2026-09-30, with program results for earlier fiscal years from CMS's archived snapshots. US medians and ranks count every hospital CMS reports; state averages are plain means of the state's reporting hospitals, not CMS's patient-weighted state rates.
The Joint Commission (since 2024)
Accreditation
None
Medical school affiliation
Private (for profit)
Ownership type
135
Medicare-certified beds
41
Registered nurses (full-time equivalent)
2015
In Medicare since
Source: CMS Provider of Services file, as reported by the hospital and state surveyors.
What Foothill Regional Medical Center reported to Medicare in its latest cost report, covering Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025.
4,778
Inpatient discharges
Medicare 32%, Medicaid 2%
18,800
Inpatient days
46% of available bed days used
294
Employees (full-time equivalent)
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS) (report 839834). Figures cover the reporting period, which is not always 12 months, and are self-reported.
Inpatient days and discharges Foothill Regional Medical Center reported by payer. Medicare and Medicaid include their managed care plans, shown separately below.
| Medicare | Medicaid | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inpatient days | 7,285 | 322 | 11,193 | 18,800 |
| Discharges | 1,516 | 75 | 3,187 | 4,778 |
| Average length of stay | 4.8 days | 4.3 days | 3.5 days | 3.9 days |
| Average daily census | 20.0 | 0.9 | 30.7 | 51.5 |
2,347
Medicare Advantage days
559 discharges
5,118
Medicaid managed care days
1,560 discharges
912
Observation bed days
| Unit | Beds | Inpatient days | Medicare days | Occupancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adults & pediatrics | 98 | 16,343 | 6,465 | 46% |
| Intensive care unit | 13 | 2,457 | 820 | 52% |
| Skilled nursing facility | 42 | 6,293 | 41% |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 839834, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Worksheet S-3 Part I.
What Foothill Regional Medical Center treats Medicare patients for most often, in 2024. 954 Medicare discharges in 29 published DRGs; 3% surgical; 83% in DRGs with complications (CC or MCC).
| Condition or procedure | Discharges | Average charges | Average Medicare payment | Estimated cost | DRG weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Septicemia or severe sepsis without MV >96 hours with MCCMS-DRG 871, medical | 217 | $113,133 | $17,956 | $18,101 | 1.98 |
| Miscellaneous disorders of nutrition, metabolism, fluids and electrolytes with MCCMS-DRG 640, medical | 81 | $68,701 | $12,008 | $10,992 | 1.32 |
| Kidney and urinary tract infections with MCCMS-DRG 689, medical | 59 | $63,126 | $10,511 | $10,100 | 1.17 |
| Heart failure and shock with MCCMS-DRG 291, medical | 58 | $90,125 | $11,613 | $14,420 | 1.28 |
| Other kidney and urinary tract diagnoses with MCCMS-DRG 698, medical | 50 | $81,286 | $14,355 | $13,006 | 1.65 |
| Other cerebrovascular disorders with MCCMS-DRG 070, medical | 42 | $71,183 | $15,287 | $11,389 | 1.79 |
| Respiratory infections and inflammations with MCCMS-DRG 177, medical | 38 | $90,554 | $14,834 | $14,489 | 1.70 |
| Miscellaneous disorders of nutrition, metabolism, fluids and electrolytes without MCCMS-DRG 641, medical | 34 | $54,402 | $6,779 | $8,704 | 0.78 |
| Kidney and urinary tract infections without MCCMS-DRG 690, medical | 31 | $55,366 | $6,669 | $8,859 | 0.81 |
| Other digestive system diagnoses with MCCMS-DRG 393, medical | 28 | $81,439 | $15,415 | $13,030 | 1.62 |
| Renal failure with MCCMS-DRG 682, medical | 28 | $79,682 | $13,355 | $12,749 | 1.50 |
| Simple pneumonia and pleurisy with MCCMS-DRG 193, medical | 27 | $75,604 | $11,896 | $12,097 | 1.33 |
| Cellulitis with MCCMS-DRG 602, medical | 26 | $72,553 | $13,336 | $11,608 | 1.49 |
| Esophagitis, gastroenteritis and miscellaneous digestive disorders without MCCMS-DRG 392, medical | 24 | $52,269 | $6,882 | $8,363 | 0.79 |
| Other cerebrovascular disorders with CCMS-DRG 071, medical | 21 | $84,283 | $9,560 | $13,485 | 1.06 |
| Infectious and parasitic diseases with o.r. procedures with MCCMS-DRG 853, surgical | 19 | $301,063 | $48,826 | $48,170 | 5.00 |
| Esophagitis, gastroenteritis and miscellaneous digestive disorders with MCCMS-DRG 391, medical | 18 | $81,411 | $11,732 | $13,026 | 1.28 |
| Septicemia or severe sepsis without MV >96 hours without MCCMS-DRG 872, medical | 17 | $65,646 | $8,845 | $10,503 | 1.03 |
| Fracture, sprain, strain and dislocation except femur, hip, pelvis and thigh with MCCMS-DRG 562, medical | 15 | $60,772 | $13,130 | $9,724 | 1.52 |
| Trauma to the skin, subcutaneous tissue and breast with MCCMS-DRG 604, medical | 15 | $75,143 | $14,441 | $12,023 | 1.51 |
See all 29 Medicare inpatient DRGs at Foothill Regional Medical Center
Source: CMS Medicare Inpatient Hospitals by Provider and Service (2024 data, released 2026-04-10), traditional Medicare only; CMS omits DRGs with fewer than 11 discharges. Estimated cost is average charges times the hospital's Medicare cost-to-charge ratio from the IPPS Impact File. Weights are the MS-DRG relative weights for the same year.
ZIP codes with the most Medicare inpatient stays at Foothill Regional Medical Center in 2025. Market share is this hospital's part of every hospital's Medicare stays from the ZIP code. Its published Medicare stays went from 915 in 2020 to 1,420 in 2025.
| ZIP code | Stays | Of this hospital's stays | Days | Charges | Market share | Share in 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92780 | 91 | 6% | 438 | $10.3M | 7% | 7% |
| 92804 | 78 | 5% | 316 | $7.9M | 3% | 3% |
| 92801 | 69 | 5% | 330 | $7.6M | 4% | 3% |
| 92805 | 60 | 4% | 296 | $7.3M | 4% | 3% |
| 92705 | 58 | 4% | 286 | $6.6M | 4% | 4% |
| 92707 | 47 | 3% | 249 | $5.7M | 4% | 3% |
| 92832 | 44 | 3% | 239 | $4.7M | 8% | 2% |
| 92833 | 44 | 3% | 178 | $4.2M | 3% | 4% |
| 92703 | 43 | 3% | 172 | $3.8M | 3% | 4% |
| 92802 | 43 | 3% | 215 | $5.1M | 4% | 2% |
| 92868 | 43 | 3% | 196 | $4.4M | 3% | 4% |
| 92701 | 39 | 3% | 137 | $3.3M | 4% | 7% |
| 92711 | 39 | 3% | 201 | $3.9M | 8% | 7% |
| 92704 | 38 | 3% | 154 | $4.4M | 2% | 2% |
| 92843 | 38 | 3% | 259 | $5.8M | 3% | 2% |
| 90620 | 36 | 3% | 139 | $3.3M | 2% | 2% |
| 92683 | 35 | 2% | 170 | $3.7M | 1% | 1% |
| 92706 | 34 | 2% | 150 | $3.4M | 4% | 3% |
| 92806 | 32 | 2% | 143 | $3.5M | 3% | 3% |
| 92627 | 31 | 2% | 129 | $2.8M | 2% | 2% |
| 90621 | 28 | 2% | 129 | $3.1M | 4% | |
| 92708 | 27 | 2% | 130 | $2.6M | 1% | 1% |
| 90631 | 26 | 2% | 109 | $2.6M | 2% | 1% |
| 90680 | 25 | 2% | 127 | $2.5M | 2% | 2% |
| 92840 | 24 | 2% | 110 | $2.5M | 1% | 2% |
Source: CMS Hospital Service Area file. Shares are of the 1,420 stays from ZIP codes CMS publishes; it omits ZIP codes with fewer than 11 stays, so market shares count published stays only.
Staff by profession and the rooms and units Foothill Regional Medical Center reported at its latest Medicare certification survey (2021). Counts are people, not full-time equivalents.
5
Operating rooms
1
Endoscopy rooms
41
Registered nurses
24
Licensed practical nurses
2
Pharmacists
24
Respiratory therapists
1
Physical therapists
1
Occupational therapists
1
Speech pathologists and audiologists
6
Radiology technicians
4
Medical technologists
1
Social workers
64
Other personnel
Source: CMS Provider of Services file.
95 clinicians who bill Medicare list Foothill Regional Medical Center as a hospital affiliation. Showing 24 of them. Book a demo to see the commercial rates insurers publish for them, or start a free trial.
Brian Riff, MD
Gastroenterology Physician
NPI 1194969030
See commercial rates for Brian Riff, MDViney Soni, M.D
Internal Medicine Physician
NPI 1447341409
See commercial rates for Viney Soni, M.DDinesh Kumar, MD
Interventional Cardiology Physician
NPI 1942239306
See commercial rates for Dinesh Kumar, MDMohammad Farukhi, M.D.
Hospitalist Physician
NPI 1578791661
See commercial rates for Mohammad Farukhi, M.D.Reza Shahbaz, M.D.
Vascular & Interventional Radiology Physician
NPI 1124349980
See commercial rates for Reza Shahbaz, M.D.Jayaram Bharadwaj, M.D.
Hematology & Oncology Physician
NPI 1083602155
See commercial rates for Jayaram Bharadwaj, M.D.Harpreet Singh, MD
Specialist
NPI 1295914216
See commercial rates for Harpreet Singh, MDAbdulkareem Sharaf, MD
Cardiovascular Disease Physician
NPI 1720344880
See commercial rates for Abdulkareem Sharaf, MDPayman Emmanuel, MD
Specialist
NPI 1831132422
See commercial rates for Payman Emmanuel, MDAndrew Breiterman, M.D.
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1770766479
See commercial rates for Andrew Breiterman, M.D.Saadah Alrajab, MD
Pulmonary Disease Physician
NPI 1023050135
See commercial rates for Saadah Alrajab, MDZavier Ahmed, M.D.
Nephrology Physician
NPI 1255677134
See commercial rates for Zavier Ahmed, M.D.Bachar Kurdi, M.D.
Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Physician
NPI 1750483327
See commercial rates for Bachar Kurdi, M.D.Paul Simpson, M.D.
Pulmonary Disease Physician
NPI 1104169978
See commercial rates for Paul Simpson, M.D.Mohammad Hajjar, M.D
Interventional Cardiology Physician
NPI 1235350893
See commercial rates for Mohammad Hajjar, M.DOctaviano Roges, M.D.
Family Medicine Physician
NPI 1316272107
See commercial rates for Octaviano Roges, M.D.Baijia Jiang, M.D.
Hematology & Oncology Physician
NPI 1922495514
See commercial rates for Baijia Jiang, M.D.Calvin Doan, DO
Family Medicine Physician
NPI 1205364569
See commercial rates for Calvin Doan, DOHung Nguyen, D.O.
Family Medicine Physician
NPI 1447284526
See commercial rates for Hung Nguyen, D.O.Sujata Lalla-Reddy, M.D.
Infectious Disease Physician
NPI 1891711909
See commercial rates for Sujata Lalla-Reddy, M.D.Harinder Gogia, M.D.
Interventional Cardiology Physician
NPI 1114924727
See commercial rates for Harinder Gogia, M.D.Christopher Salem, DO
Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician
NPI 1124273313
See commercial rates for Christopher Salem, DODaniel Kwon, DO
Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician
NPI 1639736846
See commercial rates for Daniel Kwon, DOTarun Marwaha, M.D.
Nephrology Physician
NPI 1407964976
See commercial rates for Tarun Marwaha, M.D.Source: CMS Doctors and Clinicians facility affiliations, released 2026-10-15, with names and specialties from NPPES. Affiliation means the clinician bills Medicare for care at this hospital; it is not employment.
Revenue, expenses and income Foothill Regional Medical Center reported to Medicare for Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025. Percentages are of net patient revenue.
| Line | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Gross patient revenue (charges) | $645.1M | 653.1% |
| Inpatient | $563.8M | 570.8% |
| Outpatient | $81.3M | 82.3% |
| Contractual allowances and discounts | -$546.3M | -553.1% |
| Net patient revenue | $98.8M | 100.0% |
| Operating expenses | -$190.6M | -193.0% |
| Operating income from patient care | -$91.8M | -93.0% |
| Other income | $92.4M | 93.6% |
| Net income | $593,068 | 0.6% |
| Line | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional Medicare | $67.5M | 10.5% |
| Medicaid (including managed care) | $233.2M | 36.2% |
| Other payers and self-pay | $344.3M | 53.4% |
| Total charges | $645.1M | 100.0% |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 839834, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Traditional Medicare is the program charges on Worksheets D-3 and D Part V; Medicaid is from Worksheet S-10.
Computed from Foothill Regional Medical Center's latest cost report.
-93.0%
Operating margin
Operating income from patient care / net patient revenue
0.3%
Total margin
Net income / net patient revenue plus other income
27% of expenses
Personnel costs
Salaries, direct-care contract labor and core wage-related costs / operating expenses
$57.08
Average hourly wage
Adjusted salaries / paid hours (Worksheet S-3 Part II)
0.6%
Return on assets
Net income for a year / total assets
19.0%
Return on equity
Net income for a year / fund balance
0.64
Current ratio
Current assets / current liabilities
0.25
Quick ratio
Cash, temporary investments and net receivables / current liabilities
8 days
Days cash on hand
Cash and temporary investments / daily operating expenses excluding depreciation
67 days
Days in patient receivables
Net patient receivables / daily net patient revenue
169 days
Average payment period
Current liabilities / daily operating expenses excluding depreciation
1.90
Asset turnover
Total revenue for a year / total assets
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 839834, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
What Foothill Regional Medical Center owned and owed at the end of its reporting period (Dec 2025), across all fund types: $100.7M in total assets and a $3.1M fund balance.
| Line | Amount | Of total assets |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and temporary investments | $4.2M | 4.2% |
| Patient receivables, net | $18.2M | 18.1% |
| Inventory | $2.2M | 2.1% |
| Total current assets | $56.5M | 56.1% |
| Property and equipment, net of depreciation | $37.3M | 37.1% |
| Investments and other assets | $6.8M | 6.8% |
| Total assets | $100.7M | 100.0% |
| Current liabilities | $88.2M | 87.6% |
| Total liabilities | $97.6M | 96.9% |
| Fund balance (net assets) | $3.1M | 3.1% |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 839834, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
Care Foothill Regional Medical Center provided without full payment, as reported on Worksheet S-10 of its cost report.
$806,052
Cost of charity care
Care for patients approved for charity care and uninsured discounts, at cost
$3.9M
Bad debt
Patient bills written off as uncollectible, at charges
$19.2M
Medicaid shortfall
Cost of Medicaid patients (charges times the cost-to-charge ratio) minus Medicaid payments; negative means a surplus
$19.7M
Total unreimbursed and uncompensated care
10.4% of operating expenses
Medicaid, CHIP and indigent care shortfalls plus charity care and the cost of bad debt (Worksheet S-10 line 31)
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 839834, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
Foothill Regional Medical Center's full-year cost reports, by fiscal year end. Reports shorter than ten months are left out.
| Fiscal year ending | Dec 2020 | Dec 2021 | Dec 2022 | Dec 2023 | Dec 2024 | Dec 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $81.7M | $78.6M | $88.7M | $85.1M | $94.8M | $98.8M |
| Operating expenses | $157M | $155.1M | $177.9M | $197.4M | $197.5M | $190.6M |
| Operating margin | -92.1% | -97.3% | -100.7% | -132.1% | -108.3% | -93.0% |
| Net income | $22.9M | $16.2M | $10.3M | $4.9M | $13.4M | $593,068 |
| Total assets | $69.5M | $90.4M | $263M | $238.6M | $64.8M | $100.7M |
| Discharges | 3,112 | 3,705 | 4,088 | 4,609 | 4,914 | 4,778 |
| Inpatient days | 12,618 | 13,111 | 12,996 | 15,098 | 17,052 | 18,800 |
| Medicare Advantage days | 2,179 | 1,669 | 881 | 707 | 1,862 | 2,347 |
| Beds | 177 | 127 | 147 | 147 | 153 | 153 |
| Employees (FTE) | 253 | 255 | 256 | 269 | 256 | 294 |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 839834, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
Each cost center Foothill Regional Medical Center reports, largest first. Total cost includes its share of overhead; the cost-to-charge ratio is total cost / charges.
| Department | Salaries | Total cost | Charges | Cost-to-charge | Square feet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating room | $3.8M | $11.2M | $93.8M | 0.12 | 10,520 |
| Medical supplies charged to patient | $9.4M | $11.5M | 0.82 | 1,245 | |
| Impl. dev. charged to patients | $9.1M | $37.1M | 0.24 | ||
| Emergency | $2.4M | $6.6M | $38.3M | 0.17 | 3,524 |
| Laboratory | $2.1M | $5.3M | $39.7M | 0.13 | 1,508 |
| Respiratory therapy | $2M | $3.9M | $47.3M | 0.08 | 1,454 |
| Drugs charged to patients | $3.2M | $46.1M | 0.07 | 695 | |
| Radiology-diagnostic | $880,401 | $2.4M | $9M | 0.27 | 3,017 |
| Observation beds (non-distinct part | $1.4M | $3.6M | 0.37 | ||
| Physical therapy | $466,935 | $956,605 | $3.4M | 0.28 | 1,690 |
| Ct scan | $300,870 | $558,489 | $24M | 0.02 | 412 |
| Renal dialysis | $552,839 | $1.7M | 0.33 | ||
| Ultra sound | $296,691 | $533,758 | $3.4M | 0.16 | 398 |
| Radioisotope | $344,292 | $938,307 | 0.37 | ||
| Blood storing processing & trans. | $331,384 | $949,834 | 0.35 | ||
| Electrocardiology | $162,048 | $265,413 | $5.9M | 0.05 | |
| Mri | $111,298 | $254,708 | $4.1M | 0.06 | |
| Electroencephalography | $202,367 | $317,667 | 0.64 | ||
| Occupational therapy | $120,300 | $193,481 | $1.4M | 0.14 | |
| Speech pathology | $164,101 | $639,845 | 0.26 |
| Department | Salaries | Total cost | Charges | Cost-to-charge | Square feet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adults & pediatrics | $9.6M | $25.6M | $79.4M | 0.32 | 20,029 |
| Skilled nursing facility | $5.3M | $11.1M | $43.7M | 0.25 | 10,630 |
| Intensive care unit | $3.1M | $8.6M | $148.9M | 0.06 | 4,342 |
| Department | Salaries | Direct cost | Paid hours | Average hourly wage | Square feet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative & general | $3.8M | $26M | 77,245 | $49.69 | 25,691 |
| Employee benefits department | $144,868 | $2.8M | 2,080 | $69.65 | 201 |
| Nursing administration | $2.6M | $2.7M | 35,128 | $72.66 | 304 |
| Maintenance & repairs | $659,746 | $2.4M | 13,933 | $47.35 | 1,740 |
| Cap rel costs-bldg & fixt | $2.2M | 101,190 | |||
| Pharmacy | $933,223 | $1M | 15,490 | $60.25 | |
| Housekeeping | $821,227 | $964,454 | 31,764 | $25.85 | 284 |
| Operation of plant | $849,768 | 1,798 | |||
| Cafeteria | $750,897 | 1,000 | |||
| Medical records & library | $369,933 | $579,783 | 9,485 | $39.00 | |
| Dietary | $549,071 | 675 | |||
| Laundry & linen service | $371,398 | ||||
| Cap rel costs-mvble equip | $355,345 | ||||
| Social service | $63,820 | $69,392 | 2,753 | $23.19 | |
| Central services & supply | $10,224 | 2,345 |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 839834, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Worksheets A, B-1, C Part I and S-3 Part II.
The factors Medicare uses to set what it pays Foothill Regional Medical Center for an inpatient stay.
1.46
Case mix index
Higher than 24% of hospitals paid under Medicare IPPS
Average Medicare DRG weight of its inpatient cases (FY 2027); higher means more complex, costlier care.
No Medicare-funded residents
Teaching status
Medicare-funded interns and residents per bed (FY 2027).
48.7%
Low-income patient share
Disproportionate share percentage: Medicaid and SSI patient days CMS uses for safety-net payments (FY 2027).
1,518
Medicare inpatient stays
Medicare claims CMS based FY 2027 payment rates on.
Urban (metro area)
Location type
Geographic area CMS assigns before any wage index reclassification (FY 2027).
| IPPS fiscal year | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 | FY 2027 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case mix index | 1.68 | 1.67 | 1.73 | 1.89 | 1.81 | 1.64 | 1.46 |
| Wage index | 1.275 | 1.271 | 1.277 | 1.519 | 1.451 | 1.431 | 1.399 |
| Readmissions adjustment | -0.30% | -0.27% | -0.39% | 0.00% | -0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Value-based purchasing adjustment | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | -1.22% | -0.14% |
| Medicare inpatient stays | 603 | 603 | 824 | 850 | 1,095 | 1,388 | 1,518 |
Source: CMS IPPS final rule Impact File (FY 2027).
Organizations Foothill Regional Medical Center reports to Medicare as owners or with operational control.
Astrana Care Hospital, LLC
5% or greater direct ownership interest, 100%, since 2025
Astrana Health Inc
5% or greater indirect ownership interest, 100%, since 2025
Sources: CMS Hospital All Owners.
The officers and board members on Foothill Regional Medical Center's Medicare enrollment and on the IRS Form 990 filed under its tax ID.
Source: CMS Hospital All Owners (PECOS), the people the hospital lists on its Medicare enrollment.
Foothill reg medical center - snf
CCN 555730, certified 2015, Medicare prospective payment
Source: Worksheet S-2 Part I of Foothill Regional Medical Center's latest Medicare cost report (HCRIS).
About Foothill Regional Medical Center's rates and hospital price transparency.
For MRI brain before and after contrast (CPT 70553), published negotiated rates at Foothill Regional Medical Center range from $792 to $1,811 across 4 insurers. Cigna's rate is $1,811. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $579. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
For CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast (CPT 74177), published negotiated rates at Foothill Regional Medical Center range from $350 to $1,660 across 4 insurers. Aetna's rate is $1,660. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $575. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
For Colonoscopy with polyp removal (CPT 45385), published negotiated rates at Foothill Regional Medical Center range from $2,181 to $4,848 across 4 insurers. Anthem Blue Cross / Blue Shield of CA's rate is $3,218. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $2,185. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
For Screening mammography, bilateral (CPT 77067), published negotiated rates at Foothill Regional Medical Center range from $110 to $1,827 across 4 insurers. Anthem Blue Cross / Blue Shield of CA's rate is $295. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $192. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
Foothill Regional Medical Center has a CMS overall hospital star rating of 3 out of 5 on Medicare Care Compare (CMS data released 2026-08-13). That is lower than 42% of US hospitals.
CMS reports no Medicare-funded interns or residents at Foothill Regional Medical Center for fiscal year 2027.
No. Foothill Regional Medical Center has no Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program penalty in fiscal year 2027.
In 2024, the most common were septicemia or severe sepsis without mv >96 hours with mcc (217 discharges), miscellaneous disorders of nutrition, metabolism, fluids and electrolytes with mcc (81 discharges), kidney and urinary tract infections with mcc (59 discharges).
Foothill Regional Medical Center's Medicare case mix index is 1.46 for fiscal year 2027, higher than 24% of hospitals paid under the inpatient prospective payment system.
Foothill Regional Medical Center reported 4,778 inpatient discharges and 18,800 inpatient days from Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025.
Foothill Regional Medical Center reported 294 full-time-equivalent employees on payroll from Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025.
Foothill Regional Medical Center reported $98.8M in net patient revenue on $645.1M of gross charges for Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025, an operating margin of -93.0%, and net income of $593,068.
Foothill Regional Medical Center reported $19.7M of unreimbursed and uncompensated care for Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025, including $806,052 of charity care at cost.
Insurers' price transparency files list Foothill Regional Medical Center under employer identification number 30-0804393 (Foothill Regional Medical Center). 38 health plans and networks list 30-0804393 for it.
95 clinicians who bill Medicare list Foothill Regional Medical Center as a hospital affiliation in CMS's Doctors and Clinicians data. The largest groups are emergency medicine physician (13), family medicine physician (7), infectious disease physician (7).
Yes. CMS's Provider of Services file lists The Joint Commission as the accrediting organization for Foothill Regional Medical Center, effective 2024.
In its Medicare enrollment, Foothill Regional Medical Center reports Astrana Care Hospital, LLC as 5% or greater direct ownership interest (100%).
CMS lists 25 services at Foothill Regional Medical Center, including Acute Renal Dialysis, Anesthesia, Clinical Laboratory, CT Scan, Diagnostic Radiology, Dietary Care.
In CMS's 2025 Hospital Service Area file, the most Medicare inpatient stays at Foothill Regional Medical Center came from ZIP codes 92780 (91), 92804 (78), 92801 (69).
Foothill Regional Medical Center has 153 beds, including its psychiatric, rehabilitation and other subprovider units, in its latest Medicare cost report. 135 are Medicare-certified beds in CMS's Provider of Services file. Facility type: Short Term Acute Care Hospital.
Foothill Regional Medical Center is located at 14662 Newport Avenue, Tustin, CA 92780. Its main phone number is (714) 619-7700.
Foothill Regional Medical Center's CMS Certification Number (CCN), also called its Medicare provider number, is 050780.
The National Provider Identifier (NPI) on file for Foothill Regional Medical Center is 1043632938.
Foothill Regional Medical Center is affiliated with Prospect Medical Holdings.
Foothill Regional Medical Center lists 26 in-network payers, including Aetna, Aspirus Health Plan, Avera Health Plans, BCBS, and is Medicare-certified. Insurance acceptance may vary by plan, so confirm coverage with your insurer or the hospital's billing department.
276 disclosed rate categories. Each shows the payer, category, code type and group with its code range, and contract type, along with how the rate compares with the state average.
Under 45 CFR Part 180, every US hospital must publish a machine-readable file of its standard charges, including gross charges, discounted cash prices and payer-specific negotiated rates, in the CMS template format. PayerPrice can help hospitals publish and maintain these files.
A chargemaster (charge description master, or CDM) is a hospital's master list of billable items, with codes, descriptions and gross charges. A chargemaster review looks at those lines for accuracy and pricing. PayerPrice can help hospitals review their chargemaster; contact us to discuss your needs.
For hospital finance and compliance teams
The data on this page comes from the files hospitals and payers publish. We help hospitals publish theirs correctly, and take a fresh look at their chargemaster.
We turn your chargemaster and payer contracts into the CMS template file, then keep it current as rates change.
{
"description": "MRI of brain (no contrast)",
"code_information": [
{ "code": "611", "type": "RC" },
{ "code": "70551", "type": "CPT" }
],
"standard_charges": [{
"setting": "outpatient",
"minimum": 250,
"maximum": 400,
"gross_charge": 1200,
"discounted_cash": 1080,
"payers_information": [
{
"payer_name": "Platform Health Insurance",
"plan_name": "PPO",
"methodology": "fee schedule",
"standard_charge_dollar": 400
},
{
"payer_name": "Region Health Insurance",
"plan_name": "HMO",
"methodology": "fee schedule",
"standard_charge_dollar": 250
}
]
}]
}Your chargemaster sets the gross charge on every claim, and many payer contracts base payment on it through percent-of-charge, lesser-of and stop-loss terms. We audit it line by line and show how your charges and negotiated rates compare with peer hospitals before your next negotiation.
What a review covers