Gynecology
Hysteroscopy with sampling of the uterine lining
CPT 58558
$2,762 - $4,232
from 2 insurers · median $3,497
14 Medicare claims in Level 4 Gynecologic Procedures (CMS 2024)
Rush System for Health · Oak Park, IL
4 of 5
CMS star rating
185
Beds
4,805
Inpatient discharges a year
$191.7M
Net patient revenue a year
33
In-network payers
Oak Park Hospital is a 185-bed voluntary non-profit - church hospital in Oak Park, IL, affiliated with Rush System for Health. Below you'll find publicly disclosed negotiated rates and facility details, including 33 in-network payers and 323 disclosed rate categories.
The 24 services Oak Park Hospital most likely performs, ranked by likely volume and what it is paid. Each service names one insurer. * marks hidden insurer names; A, B and C rank the remaining rates from low to high and reset for each service.
Book a demo to see hidden insurer names, more payer rates, and hospital data, or start a free trial.
Gynecology
CPT 58558
$2,762 - $4,232
from 2 insurers · median $3,497
14 Medicare claims in Level 4 Gynecologic Procedures (CMS 2024)
CT imaging
CPT 74177
$298 - $2,874
from 4 insurers · median $581
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
CT imaging
CPT 70450
$89 - $618
from 4 insurers · median $511
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Cardiology and vascular testing
CPT 93306
$228 - $2,854
from 4 insurers · median $904
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Mammography
CPT 77067
$94 - $439
from 4 insurers · median $249
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Gynecology
CPT 58571
$9,599 - $13,856
from 2 insurers · median $11,728
Typical for a hospital with this service line
Medicine & Surgery
CPT 47562
$5,157 - $7,842
from 2 insurers · median $6,500
31 Medicare claims in Level 1 Laparoscopy and Related Services (CMS 2024)
CT imaging
CPT 74176
$204 - $2,345
from 4 insurers · median $543
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Digestive procedures
CPT 45380
$1,021 - $2,615
from 3 insurers · median $1,522
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Digestive procedures
CPT 45385
$1,021 - $3,041
from 3 insurers · median $1,522
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Medicine & Surgery
CPT 49505
$3,054 - $4,697
from 2 insurers · median $3,876
29 Medicare claims in Level 1 Abdominal/Peritoneal/Biliary and Related Procedures (CMS 2024)
Digestive procedures
CPT 43239
$774 - $2,292
from 3 insurers · median $1,154
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Digestive procedures
CPT 49650
$5,157 - $7,842
from 2 insurers · median $6,500
31 Medicare claims in Level 1 Laparoscopy and Related Services (CMS 2024)
CT imaging
CPT 71275
$150 - $1,461
from 4 insurers · median $555
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
MRI imaging
CPT 70553
$298 - $2,800
from 4 insurers · median $823
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Medicine & Surgery
CPT 42820
$5,050 - $7,873
from 2 insurers · median $6,461
Typical for a hospital with this service line
X-ray and bone density
CPT 71046
$27 - $119
from 4 insurers · median $84
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Gynecology
CPT 58661
$5,157 - $7,842
from 2 insurers · median $6,500
Typical for a hospital with this service line
MRI imaging
CPT 72148
$204 - $1,569
from 4 insurers · median $813
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Nuclear imaging
CPT 78452
$381 - $1,882
from 4 insurers · median $929
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
MRI imaging
CPT 70551
$204 - $1,730
from 4 insurers · median $814
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Urology
CPT 50590
$3,007 - $4,590
from 2 insurers · median $3,799
59 Medicare claims in Level 4 Urology and Related Services (CMS 2024)
Medicine & Surgery
CPT 29881
$2,791 - $4,318
from 2 insurers · median $3,555
40 Medicare claims in Level 3 Musculoskeletal Procedures (CMS 2024)
MRI imaging
CPT 73721
$204 - $1,693
from 4 insurers · median $824
Common here, based on CMS Medicare volume
Median rate as a percent of Medicare across the outpatient services above, and how many services sit above or below the same insurer's median at nearby hospitals. * marks hidden insurer names. These table labels track the same insurers across services; the labels on each service card reset.
| Insurer | Services | Median % of Medicare | Above nearby | Below nearby |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insurer A* | 15 | 559% | 14 | 1 |
| Insurer B* | 12 | 279% | 4 | 6 |
| Insurer C* | 24 | 129% | 6 | 11 |
| Insurer D* | 24 | 84% | 3 | 21 |
How we chose these services: 6 appear in this hospital's own Medicare claims, 15 are common here based on CMS Medicare volume, and 3 are typical for the service lines it reports to CMS. Rates come from insurer and hospital price transparency files as of October 2026. Rates under a quarter of Medicare or over 20 times Medicare are left out as likely physician-fee rows or file errors. Book a demo to see all 300 CMS shoppable services for Oak Park Hospital, or start a free trial.
Acceptance varies by plan and service. Confirm coverage with your insurer or the hospital's billing department.





Quality
4 of 5 stars
Doctors and services
Accredited by The Joint Commission
Finances
$191.7M net patient revenue
Ownership and leadership
Owned by Rush System for Health
The employer identification numbers (EINs) health plans and networks list for Oak Park Hospital in the in-network rate files they publish, with the organization NPIs billed under each.
| Tax ID (EIN) | Plans and networks listing it | Organization NPIs |
|---|---|---|
| 36-2183812Rush Oak Park Hospital | 54Aetna, Cigna, United Healthcare (incl Optum, Rocky Mountain, Health Plan of Nevada, Sierra Health), Allied Benefit Systems, Ambetter and 49 more | 1558391706 Rush Oak Park Hospital Inc1629137849 Rush Oak Park Hospital Inc1932260676 Rush Oak Park Hospitaland 2 more |
Source: PayerPrice analysis of insurers' Transparency in Coverage in-network files. An EIN can cover several hospitals and clinics in a health system, and insurers sometimes list other organizations' NPIs under it.
520 South Maple Avenue, Oak Park, IL 60304
(708) 383-9300
How Oak Park Hospital compares with other US facilities on the measures CMS publishes, mostly from Medicare patients.
Overall star rating
4 of 5
Higher than 58% of US hospitals
Combines death rates, safety, readmissions, patient experience and timely care
Death rates
Better on 2 of 6 measures
2 better, 4 no different, 0 worse than the US rate
Deaths within 30 days, such as after a heart attack, pneumonia or stroke
Safety
Better on 1 of 5 measures
1 better, 4 no different, 0 worse than the US rate
Infections, surgical complications and other harm in the hospital
Readmissions
Worse on 2 of 8 measures
0 better, 6 no different, 2 worse than the US rate
Patients back in the hospital or ER soon after leaving
Patient survey rating
2 of 5
Lower than 81% of US hospitals
From the HCAHPS survey of recent inpatients
Would definitely recommend
65%
Lower than 73% of US hospitals
US median: 71%
Surveyed patients who would definitely recommend the hospital
Hospital-acquired condition penalty
Not penalized
Not among the worst-performing 25%
Medicare cuts payments 1% for the worst-performing 25% of hospitals on infections and injuries acquired in the hospital
Serious complications (PSI 90)
1.05
Higher than 74% of US hospitals
US median: 0.96
Risk-adjusted composite of complications such as bedsores, falls with hip fracture and blood clots after surgery; lower is better
Time in the ER before going home
232 min
Higher than 92% of US hospitals
US median: 148 min
Median minutes from arrival to leaving for ER patients who were sent home; lower is better
Sepsis care
35%
Lower than 95% of US hospitals
US median: 65%
Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock who got every step of the recommended early treatment; higher is better
| Measure | Result | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Overall star ratingCMS: Overall hospital quality star rating | 4 of 5 | |
| Death rates | Better on 2 of 6 measures | |
| Safety | Better on 1 of 5 measures | |
| Readmissions | Worse on 2 of 8 measures | |
| Patient survey ratingCMS: Summary star rating | 2 of 5 | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
| Would definitely recommendCMS: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital | 65% | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
| Hospital-acquired condition penaltyCMS: HAC Reduction Program payment reduction | Not penalized | 2026 |
| Serious complications (PSI 90)CMS: Patient safety and adverse events composite (PSI 90) | 1.05 | 2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 |
| Time in the ER before going homeCMS: Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, excluding patients transferred to another facility or psychiatric care/mental health patients. A lower number of minutes is better | 232 min | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
| Sepsis careCMS: Appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shock | 35% | 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 |
Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, released 2026-08-13. US comparisons rank this facility among every facility CMS reports for each measure. See Medicare Care Compare.
How Medicare adjusts Oak Park Hospital's inpatient payments for its readmissions, quality and cost results.
-0.22% on Medicare payments
Readmissions penalty
Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program adjustment for excess readmissions, as estimated in the FY 2027 IPPS final rule.
+0.68% on Medicare payments
Value-based purchasing
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing bonus or reduction for quality and cost, as estimated in the FY 2027 IPPS final rule.
Source: CMS IPPS final rule Impact File (FY 2027).
Each result CMS publishes for Oak Park Hospital, beside the US median and the average of IL hospitals. The rank says what share of US hospitals the result is better or worse than; counts and confidence limits are not ranked.
Risk-adjusted 30-day death rates and surgical complications; lower is better.
| Measure | Oak Park Hospital | US median | IL average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients2023-04-01 to 2025-03-31 | Not Available | 4.202 | |||
| Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 1,410 cases | 3 | 3.9 | 4.052 | Better than 92% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for heart attack patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 60 cases | 12.1 | 11.8 | 11.78 | Worse than 60% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for CABG surgery patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 2.39 | |||
| Death rate for COPD patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 40 cases | 7.5 | 8.5 | 8.223 | Better than 76% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for heart failure patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 228 cases | 6.6 | 11 | 10.49 | Better than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for pneumonia patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 236 cases | 9.1 | 15.2 | 15.41 | Better than 99% of US hospitals | |
| Death rate for stroke patients2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 108 cases | 13.5 | 11.6 | 11.77 | Worse than 77% of US hospitals | |
| Pressure ulcer rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 2,482 cases | 0.84 | 0.51 | 0.5668 | No Different Than the National Rate | Worse than 82% of US hospitals |
| Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | Not Available | 173 | Number of Cases Too Small | ||
| Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 3,013 cases | 0.18 | 0.2 | 0.2122 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 76% of US hospitals |
| In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 3,009 cases | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.2728 | No Different Than the National Rate | Worse than 72% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 364 cases | 2.13 | 2.29 | 2.301 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 75% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 67 cases | 1.62 | 1.63 | 1.67 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 55% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative respiratory failure rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 71 cases | 10.22 | 8.88 | 9.531 | No Different Than the National Rate | Worse than 68% of US hospitals |
| Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 374 cases | 3.43 | 3.4 | 3.714 | No Different Than the National Rate | Worse than 53% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative sepsis rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 60 cases | 4.93 | 5.105 | 5.152 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 64% of US hospitals |
| Postoperative wound dehiscence rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 66 cases | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.741 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 48% of US hospitals |
| Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 380 cases | 0.97 | 1.02 | 1.045 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 67% of US hospitals |
Unplanned returns to a hospital after a stay or an outpatient procedure; lower is better.
| Measure | Oak Park Hospital | US median | IL average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital return days for heart attack patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 11.54 | |||
| Hospital return days for heart failure patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 259 cases | -16.5 | 1.25 | 8.216 | Better than 74% of US hospitals | |
| Hospital return days for pneumonia patients2022-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 242 cases | 31.8 | 3.85 | 13.94 | Worse than 83% of US hospitals | |
| Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | ||||
| Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)2022-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 949 cases | 13.7 | 12.9 | 12.97 | No Different Than the National Rate | Worse than 82% of US hospitals |
| Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 83 cases | 9.3 | 10.7 | 11.17 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 89% of US hospitals |
| Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 83 cases | 4.7 | 5.3 | 5.176 | No Different Than the National Rate | Better than 86% of US hospitals |
| Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 421 cases | 1 | 1 | 1.016 | No Different than expected | Worse than 32% of US hospitals |
| Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 61 cases | 13.6 | 14.4 | 14.43 | Better than 83% of US hospitals | |
| Rate of readmission for CABG2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 11.3 | |||
| Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 99 cases | 18.5 | 19.8 | 20.07 | Better than 95% of US hospitals | |
| Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 360 cases | 22.3 | 21.3 | 21.51 | Worse than 78% of US hospitals | |
| Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacement2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | Not Available | 5.976 | |||
| Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission Rate2023-07-01 to 2025-06-30 · 308 cases | 18.3 | 17.2 | 17.5 | Worse than 83% of US hospitals |
Standardized infection ratios (1 is the US baseline) and the counts behind them; lower is better.
| Measure | Oak Park Hospital | US median | IL average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.037 | 0.172 | 0.315 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 3.667 | 1.504 | 2.097 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1,648 | 1,370 | 4,356 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1.345 | 0.9835 | 4.318 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1 | 0 | 2.961 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.743 | 0.484 | 0.7494 | No Different than National Benchmark | Worse than 71% of US hospitals |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.2157 | No Different than National Benchmark | ||
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1.883 | 1.392 | 1.915 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1,582 | 1,799 | 3,807 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1.591 | 1.377 | 4.51 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 0 | 2.56 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 0.399 | 0.5759 | No Different than National Benchmark | The best result, shared by 24% of US hospitals |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.3411 | |||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 2.549 | |||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 9 | 61 | 96.21 | ||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.253 | 1.591 | 2.6 | ||
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1 | 1 | 2.339 | ||
| SSI - Colon Surgery2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.9044 | |||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.3129 | |||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 3.282 | |||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 9 | 38 | 84.23 | ||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.075 | 0.328 | 0.7325 | ||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0 | 0 | 0.72 | ||
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 0.899 | |||
| MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.045 | 0.193 | 0.1945 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 4.392 | 1.855 | 2.01 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 24,030 | 14,451 | 38,381 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1.123 | 0.567 | 2.311 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 1 | 0 | 1.305 | No Different than National Benchmark | |
| MRSA Bacteremia2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.89 | 0.597 | 0.5504 | No Different than National Benchmark | Worse than 72% of US hospitals |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.037 | 0.127 | 0.1833 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.4 | 0.747 | 1.212 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 24,030 | 13,646 | 35,800 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 20.43 | 5.683 | 19.22 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 3 | 2 | 7.192 | Better than the National Benchmark | |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | 0.147 | 0.279 | 0.4067 | Better than the National Benchmark | Better than 69% of US hospitals |
How recent inpatients answered each survey question, with CMS's star rating per topic.
| Measure | Oak Park Hospital | US median | IL average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Room was "always" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 59 | 73 | 72.75 | Worse than 95% of US hospitals | |
| Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 17 | 8 | 9.158 | Worse than 94% of US hospitals | |
| Room was "usually" clean2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 24 | 18 | 18.09 | ||
| Cleanliness - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 80 | 87 | 85.64 | Worse than 91% of US hospitals | |
| Cleanliness - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 2 | 4 | 3.195 | Worse than 83% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "always" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 78 | 80 | 79.29 | Worse than 58% of US hospitals | |
| Nurse communication - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 91 | 91 | 90.92 | Worse than 49% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 5 | 4 | 4.576 | Worse than 61% of US hospitals | |
| Nurse communication - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 3 | 3 | 3.305 | Worse than 49% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 17 | 16 | 16.13 | ||
| Doctors "always" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 78 | 79 | 78.82 | Worse than 55% of US hospitals | |
| Doctor communication - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 90 | 91 | 90.1 | Worse than 55% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 7 | 5 | 5.823 | Worse than 72% of US hospitals | |
| Doctor communication - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 3 | 3 | 2.89 | Worse than 37% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" communicated well2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 15 | 16 | 15.36 | ||
| Staff "always" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 58 | 61 | 61.18 | Worse than 66% of US hospitals | |
| Communication about medicines - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 73 | 77 | 76.11 | Worse than 78% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 25 | 19 | 19.8 | Worse than 84% of US hospitals | |
| Communication about medicines - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 2 | 3 | 2.559 | Worse than 53% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "usually" explained2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 17 | 19 | 19.01 | ||
| Discharge information - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 76 | 86 | 85.26 | Worse than 97% of US hospitals | |
| No, staff "did not" give patients this information2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 24 | 13 | 13.92 | Worse than 98% of US hospitals | |
| Discharge information - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 1 | 3 | 3.237 | The lowest rating, shared by 4% of US hospitals | |
| Yes, staff "did" give patients this information2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 76 | 87 | 86.08 | Worse than 98% of US hospitals | |
| No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 25 | 14 | 14.8 | Worse than 96% of US hospitals | |
| Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 75 | 86 | 85.2 | Worse than 96% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 72 | 74 | 73.24 | Worse than 60% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 10 | 7 | 7.369 | Worse than 84% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 18 | 19 | 19.39 | ||
| Doctors "always" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 77 | 77 | 76.95 | Worse than 49% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 7 | 6 | 6.199 | Worse than 64% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 16 | 17 | 16.85 | ||
| Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 84 | 85 | 84.2 | Worse than 57% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 4 | 3 | 3.979 | Worse than 51% of US hospitals | |
| Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 12 | 11 | 11.82 | ||
| Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 12 | 8 | 8.937 | Worse than 81% of US hospitals | |
| Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 27 | 20 | 20.87 | ||
| Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 61 | 72 | 70.19 | Worse than 87% of US hospitals | |
| Overall hospital rating - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 85 | 88 | 87.19 | Worse than 78% of US hospitals | |
| Overall hospital rating - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 2 | 3 | 3.136 | Worse than 78% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "always" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 73 | 74 | 73.94 | Worse than 55% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 12 | 9 | 9.858 | Worse than 73% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "usually" explained new medications2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 15 | 16 | 16.2 | ||
| Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 72 | 75 | 74.61 | Worse than 67% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 6 | 5 | 5.915 | Worse than 51% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 22 | 20 | 19.48 | ||
| Nurses "always" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 78 | 77 | 76.32 | Better than 56% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 5 | 4 | 4.894 | Worse than 55% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" listened carefully2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 17 | 19 | 18.79 | ||
| Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 84 | 86 | 84.9 | Worse than 65% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 4 | 3 | 3.085 | Worse than 72% of US hospitals | |
| Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 12 | 11 | 12.01 | ||
| "Always" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 49 | 59 | 59.03 | Worse than 82% of US hospitals | |
| "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 17 | 9 | 10.03 | Worse than 85% of US hospitals | |
| "Usually" quiet at night2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 34 | 31 | 30.94 | ||
| Quietness - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 76 | 82 | 81.16 | Worse than 80% of US hospitals | |
| Quietness - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 2 | 3 | 3.237 | Worse than 76% of US hospitals | |
| "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it)2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 10 | 5 | 6.753 | Worse than 87% of US hospitals | |
| "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 65 | 71 | 68.65 | Worse than 73% of US hospitals | |
| Recommend hospital - linear mean score2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 84 | 87 | 85.89 | Worse than 74% of US hospitals | |
| "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 25 | 23 | 24.6 | ||
| Recommend hospital - star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 3 | 4 | 3.458 | Worse than 58% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "always" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 43 | 47 | 46.95 | Worse than 70% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 38 | 30 | 30.69 | Worse than 87% of US hospitals | |
| Staff "usually" explained possible side effects2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 19 | 22 | 22.36 | ||
| Summary star rating2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 2 | 3 | 3.119 | Worse than 81% of US hospitals | |
| No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 22 | 12 | 13.09 | Worse than 97% of US hospitals | |
| Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 569 cases | 78 | 88 | 86.91 | Worse than 97% of US hospitals |
How often the hospital gave recommended care, and how fast.
| Measure | Oak Park Hospital | US median | IL average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emergency department volume2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | high | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Diagnosis Documented2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Risk Screening2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutrition Assessment2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutritional Care Plan2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | ||||
| Hospital Harm - Severe Hyperglycemia2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 8.656 | |||
| Hospital Harm - Severe Hypoglycemia2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 1.114 | |||
| Hospital Harm - Opioid Related Adverse Events2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 0.2258 | |||
| Healthcare workers given influenza vaccination2024-10-01 to 2025-03-31 · 1,091 cases | 96 | 79 | 83.65 | Better than 90% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time all patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, including psychiatric/mental health patients and patients who were transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 397 cases | 235 | 154 | 183 | Worse than 91% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, excluding patients transferred to another facility or psychiatric care/mental health patients. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 364 cases | 232 | 148 | 175 | Worse than 92% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time psychiatric/mental health patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 24 cases | 264 | 247 | 304 | Worse than 56% of US hospitals | |
| Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before being transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is better2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 | Not Available | 315 | |||
| Left before being seen2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 48,939 cases | 6 | 1 | 2.469 | Worse than 97% of US hospitals | |
| Head CT results2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 13 cases | 85 | 74 | 78.84 | Better than 75% of US hospitals | |
| Endoscopy/polyp surveillance: appropriate follow-up interval for normal colonoscopy in average risk patients2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 88 cases | 99 | 97 | 94.09 | Better than 63% of US hospitals | |
| Improvement in Patient's Visual Function within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 90 | |||
| ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 40.38 | |||
| Safe Use of Opioids - Concurrent Prescribing2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 954 cases | 15 | 15 | 15.81 | Worse than 48% of US hospitals | |
| Appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shock2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 134 cases | 35 | 65 | 62.57 | Worse than 95% of US hospitals | |
| Septic Shock 3-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 43 cases | 35 | 73 | 71.03 | Worse than 98% of US hospitals | |
| Septic Shock 6-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 13 cases | 54 | 88 | 85.26 | Worse than 97% of US hospitals | |
| Severe Sepsis 3-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 134 cases | 66 | 82 | 79.02 | Worse than 91% of US hospitals | |
| Severe Sepsis 6-Hour Bundle2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30 · 69 cases | 93 | 94 | 92.05 | Worse than 55% of US hospitals | |
| Discharged on Antithrombotic Therapy2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 96 cases | 99 | 98 | 97 | Better than 70% of US hospitals | |
| Anticoagulation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 75.87 | |||
| Antithrombotic Therapy by End of Hospital Day 22024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 · 92 cases | 97 | 94 | 94.02 | Better than 73% of US hospitals | |
| Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 81.77 | |||
| Intensive Care Unit Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | Not Available | 94.61 |
How often scans were ordered when they may not be needed; lower is better.
| Measure | Oak Park Hospital | US median | IL average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdomen CT Use of Contrast Material2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | 6.8 | 5 | 6.493 | Worse than 69% of US hospitals | |
| Breast Cancer Screening Recall Rates2024-07-01 to 2025-06-30 | 16.9 | 6.6 | 7.806 | Worse than 94% of US hospitals |
Medicare spending around an inpatient stay compared with the US (1 is the US median).
| Measure | Oak Park Hospital | US median | IL average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary)2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0.9 | 0.99 | 0.9996 | Better than 87% of US hospitals |
The scores Medicare uses to raise or lower inpatient payments; higher is better.
| Measure | Oak Park Hospital | US median | IL average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VBP clinical outcomes domain scoreFY 2026 | 67.5 | 20 | 28.09 | Better than 97% of US hospitals | |
| VBP clinical outcomes weighted domain scoreFY 2026 | 16.88 | 5 | 7.071 | Better than 97% of US hospitals | |
| VBP efficiency and cost reduction domain scoreFY 2026 | 40 | 10 | 13.71 | Better than 77% of US hospitals | |
| VBP efficiency and cost reduction weighted domain scoreFY 2026 | 10 | 2.5 | 3.521 | Better than 76% of US hospitals | |
| VBP person and community engagement domain scoreFY 2026 | 18 | 34 | 34.29 | Worse than 83% of US hospitals | |
| VBP person and community engagement weighted domain scoreFY 2026 | 4.5 | 8.75 | 8.88 | Worse than 83% of US hospitals | |
| VBP safety domain scoreFY 2026 | 30 | 40 | 36.66 | Worse than 68% of US hospitals | |
| VBP safety weighted domain scoreFY 2026 | 7.5 | 10 | 9.377 | Worse than 68% of US hospitals | |
| VBP total performance scoreFY 2026 | 38.88 | 29.5 | 28.2 | Better than 78% of US hospitals |
| By fiscal year | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VBP clinical outcomes domain score | 67.5 | 65 | 46.67 | 35 | 50 | 67.5 |
| VBP clinical outcomes weighted domain score | 16.88 | 16.25 | 11.67 | 8.75 | 12.5 | 16.88 |
| VBP efficiency and cost reduction domain score | 60 | Not Available | 40 | 60 | 50 | 40 |
| VBP efficiency and cost reduction weighted domain score | 15 | Not Available | 10 | 15 | 12.5 | 10 |
| VBP person and community engagement domain score | 46 | Not Available | Not Available | 12 | 13 | 18 |
| VBP person and community engagement weighted domain score | 11.5 | Not Available | Not Available | 3 | 3.25 | 4.5 |
| VBP safety domain score | 73.33 | Not Available | Not Available | 80 | 35 | 30 |
| VBP safety weighted domain score | 18.33 | Not Available | Not Available | 20 | 8.75 | 7.5 |
| VBP total performance score | 61.71 | Not Available | Not Available | 46.75 | 37 | 38.88 |
Excess readmission ratios by condition; above 1 means more readmissions than expected.
| Measure | Oak Park Hospital | US median | IL average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| READM-30-AMI-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | 1 | 0.9995 | 1.015 | Worse than 50% of US hospitals | |
| READM-30-CABG-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | N/A | 1.026 | |||
| READM-30-COPD-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | 0.9631 | 0.9969 | 1.009 | Better than 81% of US hospitals | |
| READM-30-HF-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 265 cases | 1.015 | 0.9983 | 1.013 | Worse than 61% of US hospitals | |
| READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | N/A | 1.055 | |||
| READM-30-PN-HRRP2021-07-01 to 2024-06-30 · 224 cases | 1.055 | 0.9955 | 1.018 | Worse than 81% of US hospitals |
| By fiscal year | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| READM-30-AMI-HRRP | 1.027 | 1.001 | 1.042 | 1.067 | 1.096 | 1 |
| READM-30-CABG-HRRP | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| READM-30-COPD-HRRP | 0.9126 | 0.9563 | 0.991 | 0.9852 | 0.9621 | 0.9631 |
| READM-30-HF-HRRP | 1.065 | 1.019 | 1.01 | 1.037 | 1.053 | 1.015 |
| READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| READM-30-PN-HRRP | 1.059 | 1.045 | 1.027 | 0.9982 | 0.99 | 1.055 |
Infection ratios, the PSI 90 composite and the total score Medicare ranks hospitals on; lower is better.
| Measure | Oak Park Hospital | US median | IL average | CMS comparison | US rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAUTI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0 | 0.489 | 0.5958 | The best result, shared by 14% of US hospitals | |
| CDI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0.285 | 0.346 | 0.436 | Better than 60% of US hospitals | |
| CLABSI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 1.109 | 0.559 | 0.7638 | Worse than 87% of US hospitals | |
| HAC Reduction Program payment reductionFY 2026 | No | ||||
| MRSA standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 1.31 | 0.6405 | 0.6364 | Worse than 88% of US hospitals | |
| Patient safety and adverse events composite (PSI 90)2022-07-01 to 2024-06-30 | 1.054 | 0.9628 | 0.9883 | Worse than 74% of US hospitals | |
| SSI standardized infection ratio2023-01-01 to 2024-12-31 | 0.63 | 0.7945 | 0.9041 | Better than 62% of US hospitals | |
| Total HAC scoreFY 2026 | 0.1421 | -0.0453 | 0.07842 | Worse than 61% of US hospitals |
| By fiscal year | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAC Reduction Program payment reduction | No | No | N/A | No | No | No |
| Total HAC score | -0.9912 | -0.7464 | 0 | -0.6458 | -0.4481 | 0.1421 |
Source: CMS Care Compare hospital files, latest release 2026-09-30, with program results for earlier fiscal years from CMS's archived snapshots. US medians and ranks count every hospital CMS reports; state averages are plain means of the state's reporting hospitals, not CMS's patient-weighted state rates.
The Joint Commission (since 2024)
Accreditation
Limited
Medical school affiliation
Private (not for profit)
Ownership type
296
Medicare-certified beds
109
Registered nurses (full-time equivalent)
1966
In Medicare since
Source: CMS Provider of Services file, as reported by the hospital and state surveyors.
What Oak Park Hospital reported to Medicare in its latest cost report, covering Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025.
4,805
Inpatient discharges
Medicare 31%, Medicaid 2%
20,160
Inpatient days
30% of available bed days used
795
Employees (full-time equivalent)
13
Interns and residents (full-time equivalent)
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS) (report 844412). Figures cover the reporting period, which is not always 12 months, and are self-reported.
Inpatient days and discharges Oak Park Hospital reported by payer. Medicare and Medicaid include their managed care plans, shown separately below.
| Medicare | Medicaid | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inpatient days | 6,538 | 467 | 13,155 | 20,160 |
| Discharges | 1,501 | 104 | 3,200 | 4,805 |
| Average length of stay | 4.4 days | 4.5 days | 4.1 days | 4.2 days |
| Average daily census | 17.9 | 1.3 | 36.0 | 55.2 |
6,559
Medicare Advantage days
1,359 discharges
3,507
Medicaid managed care days
869 discharges
4,730
Observation bed days
| Unit | Beds | Inpatient days | Medicare days | Occupancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adults & pediatrics | 171 | 17,577 | 5,677 | 28% |
| Intensive care unit | 14 | 2,583 | 861 | 51% |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 844412, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Worksheet S-3 Part I.
What Oak Park Hospital treats Medicare patients for most often, in 2024. 880 Medicare discharges in 32 published DRGs; 4% surgical; 80% in DRGs with complications (CC or MCC).
| Condition or procedure | Discharges | Average charges | Average Medicare payment | Estimated cost | DRG weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Septicemia or severe sepsis without MV >96 hours with MCCMS-DRG 871, medical | 161 | $44,801 | $13,691 | $14,784 | 1.98 |
| Heart failure and shock with MCCMS-DRG 291, medical | 111 | $28,103 | $8,667 | $9,274 | 1.28 |
| Renal failure with CCMS-DRG 683, medical | 36 | $20,208 | $5,901 | $6,669 | 0.90 |
| Kidney and urinary tract infections without MCCMS-DRG 690, medical | 36 | $20,863 | $5,398 | $6,885 | 0.81 |
| Renal failure with MCCMS-DRG 682, medical | 34 | $30,658 | $10,485 | $10,117 | 1.50 |
| Miscellaneous disorders of nutrition, metabolism, fluids and electrolytes with MCCMS-DRG 640, medical | 33 | $26,443 | $9,251 | $8,726 | 1.32 |
| Septicemia or severe sepsis without MV >96 hours without MCCMS-DRG 872, medical | 32 | $28,545 | $6,439 | $9,420 | 1.03 |
| Respiratory infections and inflammations with MCCMS-DRG 177, medical | 28 | $31,415 | $10,967 | $10,367 | 1.70 |
| Esophagitis, gastroenteritis and miscellaneous digestive disorders without MCCMS-DRG 392, medical | 28 | $20,059 | $4,697 | $6,619 | 0.79 |
| Other kidney and urinary tract diagnoses with MCCMS-DRG 698, medical | 27 | $25,512 | $11,703 | $8,419 | 1.65 |
| Cardiac arrhythmia and conduction disorders with CCMS-DRG 309, medical | 24 | $19,246 | $4,763 | $6,351 | 0.74 |
| Gastrointestinal hemorrhage with CCMS-DRG 378, medical | 23 | $24,831 | $6,621 | $8,194 | 0.98 |
| Simple pneumonia and pleurisy with MCCMS-DRG 193, medical | 22 | $23,744 | $8,827 | $7,836 | 1.33 |
| Infectious and parasitic diseases with o.r. procedures with MCCMS-DRG 853, surgical | 22 | $89,845 | $35,554 | $29,649 | 5.00 |
| Cellulitis without MCCMS-DRG 603, medical | 21 | $21,810 | $5,198 | $7,197 | 0.88 |
| Kidney and urinary tract infections with MCCMS-DRG 689, medical | 20 | $22,020 | $8,134 | $7,267 | 1.17 |
| Diabetes with CCMS-DRG 638, medical | 18 | $22,357 | $5,639 | $7,378 | 0.90 |
| Intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral infarction with MCCMS-DRG 064, medical | 17 | $36,572 | $12,917 | $12,069 | 2.00 |
| Pulmonary embolism without MCCMS-DRG 176, medical | 17 | $21,890 | $5,478 | $7,224 | 0.82 |
| Pulmonary edema and respiratory failureMS-DRG 189, medical | 16 | $24,280 | $8,482 | $8,012 | 1.23 |
See all 32 Medicare inpatient DRGs at Oak Park Hospital
Source: CMS Medicare Inpatient Hospitals by Provider and Service (2024 data, released 2026-04-10), traditional Medicare only; CMS omits DRGs with fewer than 11 discharges. Estimated cost is average charges times the hospital's Medicare cost-to-charge ratio from the IPPS Impact File. Weights are the MS-DRG relative weights for the same year.
The comprehensive outpatient service groups (APCs) Oak Park Hospital billed Medicare for most in 2024: 1,441 services in all.
| Service group | Services | Patients | Average charges | Average Medicare payment | US average payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive Observation ServicesAPC 8011 | 306 | 284 | $12,747 | $2,050 | $2,090 |
| Level 5 Musculoskeletal ProceduresAPC 5115 | 149 | 139 | $44,088 | $10,772 | $10,772 |
| Level 2 Excision/ Biopsy/ Incision and DrainageAPC 5072 | 119 | 111 | $5,617 | $1,191 | $1,220 |
| Level 1 Intraocular ProceduresAPC 5491 | 111 | 73 | $16,390 | $1,744 | $1,752 |
| Level 4 Urology and Related ServicesAPC 5374 | 59 | 42 | $17,230 | $2,637 | $2,629 |
| Level 3 Urology and Related ServicesAPC 5373 | 50 | 45 | $14,905 | $1,510 | $1,516 |
| Level 1 Endovascular ProceduresAPC 5191 | 43 | 43 | $22,047 | $2,220 | $2,208 |
| Level 5 Urology and Related ServicesAPC 5375 | 43 | 40 | $24,189 | $3,914 | $3,918 |
| Level 1 Breast/Lymphatic Surgery and Related ProceduresAPC 5091 | 41 | 40 | $16,167 | $2,883 | $2,930 |
| Level 3 Musculoskeletal ProceduresAPC 5113 | 40 | 38 | $19,899 | $2,447 | $2,373 |
See all 29 Medicare outpatient services at Oak Park Hospital
Source: CMS Medicare Outpatient Hospitals by Provider and Service (2024 data, released 2026-06-24), comprehensive APCs for traditional Medicare; CMS omits services with fewer than 11 claims. The US average weights every hospital by its services.
ZIP codes with the most Medicare inpatient stays at Oak Park Hospital in 2025. Market share is this hospital's part of every hospital's Medicare stays from the ZIP code. Its published Medicare stays went from 2,104 in 2020 to 2,779 in 2025.
| ZIP code | Stays | Of this hospital's stays | Days | Charges | Market share | Share in 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60302 | 602 | 22% | 2,601 | $25.9M | 47% | 44% |
| 60644 | 329 | 12% | 1,441 | $14.5M | 16% | 9% |
| 60651 | 221 | 8% | 938 | $9.1M | 10% | 7% |
| 60402 | 202 | 7% | 856 | $8.5M | 11% | 6% |
| 60304 | 199 | 7% | 898 | $8.7M | 49% | 38% |
| 60130 | 197 | 7% | 767 | $7.5M | 34% | 36% |
| 60707 | 174 | 6% | 768 | $7.8M | 9% | 7% |
| 60305 | 145 | 5% | 516 | $5.9M | 37% | 31% |
| 60639 | 120 | 4% | 547 | $5M | 5% | 3% |
| 60624 | 84 | 3% | 360 | $3.1M | 5% | 4% |
| 60153 | 69 | 2% | 312 | $3M | 6% | 4% |
| 60623 | 68 | 2% | 294 | $2.9M | 3% | 2% |
| 60804 | 60 | 2% | 256 | $2.6M | 3% | 3% |
| 60634 | 39 | 1% | 130 | $1.4M | 1% | 1% |
| 60301 | 35 | 1% | 178 | $1.7M | 50% | 100% |
| 60160 | 32 | 1% | 164 | $1.9M | 5% | 4% |
| 60104 | 30 | 1% | 121 | $1.2M | 3% | 4% |
| 60612 | 27 | 1% | 145 | $1.2M | 2% | 2% |
| 60154 | 24 | 1% | 113 | $1M | 2% | 2% |
| 60647 | 24 | 1% | 105 | $1M | 1% | |
| 60546 | 21 | 1% | 58 | $615,925 | 4% | 4% |
| 60155 | 20 | 1% | 80 | $649,266 | 5% | 6% |
| 60638 | 19 | 1% | 79 | $851,299 | 1% | 1% |
| 60534 | 14 | 1% | 88 | $820,334 | 3% | |
| 60148 | 12 | 0% | 48 | $485,404 | 1% |
Source: CMS Hospital Service Area file. Shares are of the 2,779 stays from ZIP codes CMS publishes; it omits ZIP codes with fewer than 11 stays, so market shares count published stays only.
Staff by profession and the rooms and units Oak Park Hospital reported at its latest Medicare certification survey (2016). Counts are people, not full-time equivalents.
24
Rehabilitation unit beds
109
Registered nurses
12
Licensed practical nurses
20
Physicians
4
Pharmacists
7
Physical therapists
6
Occupational therapists
1
Speech pathologists and audiologists
2
Dietitians
2
Social workers
438
Other personnel
Source: CMS Provider of Services file.
705 clinicians who bill Medicare list Oak Park Hospital as a hospital affiliation. Showing 24 of them. Book a demo to see the commercial rates insurers publish for them, or start a free trial.
Victor Romano, M.D.
Orthopaedic Surgery Physician
NPI 1033149901
See commercial rates for Victor Romano, M.D.Jonathan Foster, M.D.
Body Imaging Physician
NPI 1093909483
See commercial rates for Jonathan Foster, M.D.Max Fitzgerald, MD
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Physician
NPI 1063774289
See commercial rates for Max Fitzgerald, MDVasili Karas, M.D.
Adult Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery Physician
NPI 1063778413
See commercial rates for Vasili Karas, M.D.Xuyang Song, M.D.
Sports Medicine (Orthopaedic Surgery) Physician
NPI 1942681101
See commercial rates for Xuyang Song, M.D.Maria Mcgann, D.O.
Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgery Physician
NPI 1790058717
See commercial rates for Maria Mcgann, D.O.Adam Yanke, M.D.
Sports Medicine (Orthopaedic Surgery) Physician
NPI 1639335953
See commercial rates for Adam Yanke, M.D.Chandler Gill, MD
Neurology Physician
NPI 1548688716
See commercial rates for Chandler Gill, MDNikhil Verma, M.D.
Sports Medicine (Orthopaedic Surgery) Physician
NPI 1659350353
See commercial rates for Nikhil Verma, M.D.Jaime Belmares Avalos, MD
Infectious Disease Physician
NPI 1164457578
See commercial rates for Jaime Belmares Avalos, MDAalok Patel, MD
Adult Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery Physician
NPI 1700317658
See commercial rates for Aalok Patel, MDDavid Springer, M.D.
Ophthalmology Physician
NPI 1003811787
See commercial rates for David Springer, M.D.Sandeep Amin, MD
Interventional Pain Medicine Physician
NPI 1184792251
See commercial rates for Sandeep Amin, MDMohamed Hussein, MD
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1477160158
See commercial rates for Mohamed Hussein, MDRamya Gaddikeri, MD
Diagnostic Neuroimaging (Radiology) Physician
NPI 1609216399
See commercial rates for Ramya Gaddikeri, MDTimothy Larsen, D.O.
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Physician
NPI 1477845337
See commercial rates for Timothy Larsen, D.O.Faaiza Mahmoud, M.D.
Body Imaging Physician
NPI 1881643559
See commercial rates for Faaiza Mahmoud, M.D.Mckenzie Greene, PA
Physician Assistant
NPI 1154881837
See commercial rates for Mckenzie Greene, PAErica Klein, M.D.
Pediatric Radiology Physician
NPI 1760860829
See commercial rates for Erica Klein, M.D.Maham Jehangir, M.D.
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1477042091
See commercial rates for Maham Jehangir, M.D.Peter Reisz, M.D.
Urology Physician
NPI 1083091227
See commercial rates for Peter Reisz, M.D.Palmi Shah, MD
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1477668929
See commercial rates for Palmi Shah, MDMatthew Jaycox, M.D.
Interventional Pain Medicine Physician
NPI 1326204199
See commercial rates for Matthew Jaycox, M.D.Aris Musabji, MD
Diagnostic Radiology Physician
NPI 1588861728
See commercial rates for Aris Musabji, MDSource: CMS Doctors and Clinicians facility affiliations, released 2026-10-15, with names and specialties from NPPES. Affiliation means the clinician bills Medicare for care at this hospital; it is not employment.
Revenue, expenses and income Oak Park Hospital reported to Medicare for Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025. Percentages are of net patient revenue.
| Line | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Gross patient revenue (charges) | $882.3M | 460.2% |
| Inpatient | $198.4M | 103.5% |
| Outpatient | $683.8M | 356.7% |
| Contractual allowances and discounts | -$690.6M | -360.2% |
| Net patient revenue | $191.7M | 100.0% |
| Operating expenses | -$183.5M | -95.7% |
| Operating income from patient care | $8.2M | 4.3% |
| Other income | $24.3M | 12.7% |
| Other expenses | -$9.7M | -5.0% |
| Net income | $22.9M | 11.9% |
| Line | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional Medicare | $161.7M | 18.3% |
| Medicaid (including managed care) | $190.5M | 21.6% |
| Other payers and self-pay | $530M | 60.1% |
| Total charges | $882.2M | 100.0% |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 844412, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Traditional Medicare is the program charges on Worksheets D-3 and D Part V; Medicaid is from Worksheet S-10.
Computed from Oak Park Hospital's latest cost report.
4.3%
Operating margin
Operating income from patient care / net patient revenue
10.6%
Total margin
Net income / net patient revenue plus other income
14.6%
EBITDAR margin
Net income before interest, depreciation and leases (Worksheet A-7), / total revenue
55% of expenses
Personnel costs
Salaries, direct-care contract labor and core wage-related costs / operating expenses
$44.04
Average hourly wage
Adjusted salaries / paid hours (Worksheet S-3 Part II)
10.5%
Return on assets
Net income for a year / total assets
14.5%
Return on equity
Net income for a year / fund balance
1.34
Current ratio
Current assets / current liabilities
1.32
Quick ratio
Cash, temporary investments and net receivables / current liabilities
90 days
Days cash on hand
Cash and temporary investments / daily operating expenses excluding depreciation
51 days
Days in patient receivables
Net patient receivables / daily net patient revenue
110 days
Average payment period
Current liabilities / daily operating expenses excluding depreciation
0.99
Asset turnover
Total revenue for a year / total assets
10.4 years
Average age of plant
Accumulated depreciation / depreciation for a year
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 844412, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
What Oak Park Hospital owned and owed at the end of its reporting period (Jun 2025), across all fund types: $218.2M in total assets and a $157.9M fund balance.
| Line | Amount | Of total assets |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and temporary investments | $43.4M | 19.9% |
| Patient receivables, net | $26.9M | 12.3% |
| Inventory | $4.9M | 2.2% |
| Total current assets | $71.3M | 32.7% |
| Property and equipment, net of depreciation | $83.8M | 38.4% |
| Investments and other assets | $63.1M | 28.9% |
| Total assets | $218.2M | 100.0% |
| Current liabilities | $53.1M | 24.3% |
| Total liabilities | $60.3M | 27.6% |
| Fund balance (net assets) | $157.9M | 72.4% |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 844412, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
Care Oak Park Hospital provided without full payment, as reported on Worksheet S-10 of its cost report.
$5.8M
Cost of charity care
Care for patients approved for charity care and uninsured discounts, at cost
$9.4M
Bad debt
Patient bills written off as uncollectible, at charges
$19.1M
Medicaid shortfall
Cost of Medicaid patients (charges times the cost-to-charge ratio) minus Medicaid payments; negative means a surplus
$20M
Total unreimbursed and uncompensated care
10.9% of operating expenses
Medicaid, CHIP and indigent care shortfalls plus charity care and the cost of bad debt (Worksheet S-10 line 31)
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 844412, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
Oak Park Hospital's full-year cost reports, by fiscal year end. Reports shorter than ten months are left out.
| Fiscal year ending | Jun 2020 | Jun 2021 | Jun 2022 | Jun 2023 | Jun 2024 | Jun 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $136.4M | $160.6M | $165.2M | $173.4M | $195.2M | $191.7M |
| Operating expenses | $149.1M | $148.8M | $164.5M | $188.5M | $197.7M | $183.5M |
| Operating margin | -9.4% | 7.3% | 0.4% | -8.7% | -1.3% | 4.3% |
| Net income | -$11.8M | $28.4M | -$949,279 | -$613,338 | $14.7M | $22.9M |
| Total assets | $159.3M | $188.2M | $174.3M | $172.5M | $181.2M | $218.2M |
| Discharges | 4,214 | 4,213 | 4,382 | 4,458 | 4,497 | 4,805 |
| Inpatient days | 15,388 | 18,081 | 18,967 | 19,713 | 19,769 | 20,160 |
| Medicare Advantage days | 2,139 | 3,430 | 4,108 | 5,184 | 5,845 | 6,559 |
| Beds | 201 | 185 | 185 | 185 | 185 | 185 |
| Employees (FTE) | 815 | 787 | 745 | 694 | 855 | 795 |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 844412, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements.
Each cost center Oak Park Hospital reports, largest first. Total cost includes its share of overhead; the cost-to-charge ratio is total cost / charges.
| Department | Salaries | Total cost | Charges | Cost-to-charge | Square feet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emergency | $8.5M | $19.2M | $142.1M | 0.14 | 26,730 |
| Operating room | $5.7M | $16.9M | $89M | 0.19 | 19,834 |
| Radiology-diagnostic | $4.9M | $15M | $95.5M | 0.16 | 25,090 |
| Impl. dev. charged to patients | $13.5M | $30.5M | 0.44 | ||
| Laboratory | $3.1M | $12.6M | $96.9M | 0.13 | 8,515 |
| Medical supplies charged to patient | $12M | $28.8M | 0.42 | ||
| Drugs charged to patients | $10.5M | $66.6M | 0.16 | ||
| Observation beds (non-distinct part | $7.2M | $9.3M | 0.77 | ||
| Anesthesiology | $2M | $7M | $29.6M | 0.24 | 369 |
| Radioisotope | $1.8M | $5.2M | $22M | 0.24 | 5,279 |
| Clinic | $1.5M | $4.3M | $11.6M | 0.37 | 11,776 |
| Recovery room | $1.9M | $3.8M | $11M | 0.35 | 3,583 |
| Endoscopy | $1.4M | $3.7M | $26.7M | 0.14 | 4,558 |
| Ct scan | $902,474 | $3.7M | $85.6M | 0.04 | 1,561 |
| Wound care | $954,749 | $3.7M | $16.8M | 0.22 | 4,009 |
| Electrocardiology | $1.3M | $3.2M | $33.7M | 0.09 | 7,067 |
| Respiratory therapy | $1.4M | $3.1M | $7.8M | 0.40 | 4,015 |
| Ultrasound/vasc lab | $882,322 | $2M | $17.7M | 0.12 | 1,487 |
| Physical therapy | $336,298 | $1.9M | $1.8M | 1.04 | 10,904 |
| Whole blood & packed red blood cell | $1.1M | $3.8M | 0.29 | 2,047 | |
| Occupational therapy | $329,081 | $809,791 | $992,947 | 0.82 | 1,617 |
| Renal dialysis | $25,740 | $804,364 | $1.1M | 0.71 | 965 |
| Pulmonary rehab | $224,383 | $400,493 | $769,480 | 0.52 | 114 |
| Speech pathology | $141,559 | $302,324 | $580,129 | 0.52 | 663 |
| Electroencephalography | $56,928 | $190,893 | $483,423 | 0.39 | 834 |
| Department | Salaries | Total cost | Charges | Cost-to-charge | Square feet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adults & pediatrics | $13.6M | $34.1M | $40.4M | 0.84 | 30,162 |
| Intensive care unit | $4.1M | $9.3M | $10.9M | 0.85 | 7,957 |
| Department | Salaries | Direct cost | Paid hours | Average hourly wage | Square feet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other admin & general | $7.9M | $41.3M | 11,163 | ||
| Operation of plant | $3M | $12M | 91,899 | $32.90 | 178,149 |
| Cap rel costs-mvble equip | $5.6M | ||||
| Cap rel costs-bldg & fixt | $3.8M | 434,415 | |||
| Housekeeping | $2M | $3.2M | 94,105 | $21.57 | 2,854 |
| Pharmacy | $2M | $2.7M | 36,506 | $54.86 | 3,267 |
| Nursing administration | $1.9M | $2.6M | 33,191 | $56.97 | 2,266 |
| Central services & supply | $582,901 | $1.4M | 23,360 | $24.95 | 8,206 |
| Admitting | $922,817 | $1.3M | 1,940 | ||
| Medical records & library | $828,834 | $1.3M | 25,894 | $32.01 | 5,622 |
| Dietary | $1.2M | $1.1M | 27,249 | $23.61 | 16,127 |
| Laundry & linen service | $117,174 | $745,541 | 6,123 | $19.14 | |
| Social service | $438,238 | $609,774 | 12,257 | $35.75 | |
| Cafeteria | $466,430 | 24,826 | $23.61 | ||
| I&r services-other prgm costs apprv | $451,868 | ||||
| Employee benefits department | $286,624 | $286,378 | 5,897 | $48.61 | 3,669 |
Source: CMS cost report (HCRIS, Form 2552-10), report 844412, as submitted. Hospitals report these figures themselves; they are not audited financial statements. Worksheets A, B-1, C Part I and S-3 Part II.
The factors Medicare uses to set what it pays Oak Park Hospital for an inpatient stay.
1.55
Case mix index
Higher than 34% of hospitals paid under Medicare IPPS
Average Medicare DRG weight of its inpatient cases (FY 2027); higher means more complex, costlier care.
Teaching hospital
Teaching status
0.02 residents per bed
Medicare-funded interns and residents per bed (FY 2027).
26.1%
Low-income patient share
Disproportionate share percentage: Medicaid and SSI patient days CMS uses for safety-net payments (FY 2027).
1,523
Medicare inpatient stays
Medicare claims CMS based FY 2027 payment rates on.
Urban (metro area)
Location type
Geographic area CMS assigns before any wage index reclassification (FY 2027).
| IPPS fiscal year | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 | FY 2027 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case mix index | 1.61 | 1.61 | 1.69 | 1.61 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.55 |
| Wage index | 1.035 | 1.033 | 1.038 | 1.021 | 1.071 | 1.081 | 1.172 |
| Readmissions adjustment | -0.37% | -0.56% | -0.24% | -0.07% | -0.14% | -0.22% | -0.22% |
| Value-based purchasing adjustment | +1.19% | +1.96% | +1.96% | -0.32% | +2.44% | +1.31% | +0.68% |
| Medicare inpatient stays | 1,799 | 1,799 | 1,665 | 1,642 | 1,542 | 1,495 | 1,523 |
Source: CMS IPPS final rule Impact File (FY 2027).
Organizations Oak Park Hospital reports to Medicare as owners or with operational control.
Rush System for Health
5% or greater direct ownership interest, 100%, since 2023
Sources: CMS Hospital All Owners.
The officers and board members on Oak Park Hospital's Medicare enrollment and on the IRS Form 990 filed under its tax ID.
Source: CMS Hospital All Owners (PECOS), the people the hospital lists on its Medicare enrollment; the first 9 of 11 are shown.
Rush Oak Park Hospital Inc files the Form 990 for the tax ID insurers list for Oak Park Hospital, so these people may lead the wider organization rather than Oak Park Hospital alone.
| Name | Title |
|---|---|
| Patricia S O'Neil MAE | Treasurer |
| Dino P Rumoro DO MPH FACEP | President & CEO |
| Brian D Stein MD Ms | Acting Chief Medical Officer |
| Angela Cooper Dnp RN Cnl | Assoc VP Of Patient Care & CNO |
| Keri Fair MD | Medical Staff President (start 10/22) |
| Jennifer Cunningham MD | President Of Medical Staff (end 9/22) |
| Gary E McCullough | Director/chair |
Board members: Paul Casey MD MBA FACEP, David A Ansell MD, Cheryl Ingram, Everett Ward, Jane Llewellyn, Sandra Sokol.
Source: IRS Form 990 Part VII filed by Rush Oak Park Hospital Inc (EIN 36-2183812), via the IRS e-file data. A health system's return can cover several hospitals.
About Oak Park Hospital's rates and hospital price transparency.
For MRI brain before and after contrast (CPT 70553), published negotiated rates at Oak Park Hospital range from $298 to $2,800 across 4 insurers. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois's rate is $2,800. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $1,256. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
For CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast (CPT 74177), published negotiated rates at Oak Park Hospital range from $298 to $2,874 across 4 insurers. Aetna's rate is $717. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $794. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
For Colonoscopy with biopsy (CPT 45380), published negotiated rates at Oak Park Hospital range from $1,021 to $2,615 across 3 insurers. UnitedHealthcare's rate is $1,021. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $1,795. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
For Screening mammography, bilateral (CPT 77067), published negotiated rates at Oak Park Hospital range from $94 to $439 across 4 insurers. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois's rate is $439. The median at nearby comparable hospitals is $159. What a patient pays depends on their plan's deductible, coinsurance and network status.
Oak Park Hospital has a CMS overall hospital star rating of 4 out of 5 on Medicare Care Compare (CMS data released 2026-08-13). That is higher than 58% of US hospitals.
Yes. CMS counts 0.02 Medicare-funded residents per bed at Oak Park Hospital for fiscal year 2027, so it is a teaching hospital.
Yes. Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, Medicare cuts Oak Park Hospital's base inpatient payments by an estimated 0.22% in fiscal year 2027 for more readmissions than expected.
In 2024, the most common were septicemia or severe sepsis without mv >96 hours with mcc (161 discharges), heart failure and shock with mcc (111 discharges), renal failure with cc (36 discharges).
Oak Park Hospital's Medicare case mix index is 1.55 for fiscal year 2027, higher than 34% of hospitals paid under the inpatient prospective payment system.
Oak Park Hospital reported 4,805 inpatient discharges and 20,160 inpatient days from Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025.
Oak Park Hospital reported 795 full-time-equivalent employees on payroll from Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025.
Oak Park Hospital reported $191.7M in net patient revenue on $882.3M of gross charges for Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025, an operating margin of 4.3%, and net income of $22.9M.
Oak Park Hospital reported $20M of unreimbursed and uncompensated care for Jul 1, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025, including $5.8M of charity care at cost.
Oak Park Hospital's Medicare enrollment lists Dino P Rumoro as President & CEO since 2021.
Insurers' price transparency files list Oak Park Hospital under employer identification number 36-2183812 (Rush Oak Park Hospital). 54 health plans and networks list 36-2183812 for it.
705 clinicians who bill Medicare list Oak Park Hospital as a hospital affiliation in CMS's Doctors and Clinicians data. The largest groups are internal medicine physician (59), family nurse practitioner (42), family medicine physician (39).
Yes. CMS's Provider of Services file lists The Joint Commission as the accrediting organization for Oak Park Hospital, effective 2024.
In its Medicare enrollment, Oak Park Hospital reports Rush System for Health as 5% or greater direct ownership interest (100%).
CMS lists 18 services at Oak Park Hospital, including Anesthesia, Coronary Care Unit, Diagnostic Radiology, Dietary Care, Emergency Department, Inpatient Surgical.
In CMS's 2025 Hospital Service Area file, the most Medicare inpatient stays at Oak Park Hospital came from ZIP codes 60302 (602), 60644 (329), 60651 (221).
Oak Park Hospital has 185 beds, including its psychiatric, rehabilitation and other subprovider units, in its latest Medicare cost report. 296 are Medicare-certified beds in CMS's Provider of Services file. Facility type: Short Term Acute Care Hospital.
Oak Park Hospital is located at 520 South Maple Avenue, Oak Park, IL 60304. Its main phone number is (708) 383-9300.
Oak Park Hospital's CMS Certification Number (CCN), also called its Medicare provider number, is 140063.
The National Provider Identifier (NPI) on file for Oak Park Hospital is 1558391706.
Oak Park Hospital is affiliated with Rush System for Health.
Oak Park Hospital lists 33 in-network payers, including Aetna, Ambetter, Ameri Health, Aspirus Health Plan, and is Medicare-certified. Insurance acceptance may vary by plan, so confirm coverage with your insurer or the hospital's billing department.
323 disclosed rate categories. Each shows the payer, category, code type and group with its code range, and contract type, along with how the rate compares with the state average.
Under 45 CFR Part 180, every US hospital must publish a machine-readable file of its standard charges, including gross charges, discounted cash prices and payer-specific negotiated rates, in the CMS template format. PayerPrice can help hospitals publish and maintain these files.
A chargemaster (charge description master, or CDM) is a hospital's master list of billable items, with codes, descriptions and gross charges. A chargemaster review looks at those lines for accuracy and pricing. PayerPrice can help hospitals review their chargemaster; contact us to discuss your needs.
For hospital finance and compliance teams
The data on this page comes from the files hospitals and payers publish. We help hospitals publish theirs correctly, and take a fresh look at their chargemaster.
We turn your chargemaster and payer contracts into the CMS template file, then keep it current as rates change.
{
"description": "MRI of brain (no contrast)",
"code_information": [
{ "code": "611", "type": "RC" },
{ "code": "70551", "type": "CPT" }
],
"standard_charges": [{
"setting": "outpatient",
"minimum": 250,
"maximum": 400,
"gross_charge": 1200,
"discounted_cash": 1080,
"payers_information": [
{
"payer_name": "Platform Health Insurance",
"plan_name": "PPO",
"methodology": "fee schedule",
"standard_charge_dollar": 400
},
{
"payer_name": "Region Health Insurance",
"plan_name": "HMO",
"methodology": "fee schedule",
"standard_charge_dollar": 250
}
]
}]
}Your chargemaster sets the gross charge on every claim, and many payer contracts base payment on it through percent-of-charge, lesser-of and stop-loss terms. We audit it line by line and show how your charges and negotiated rates compare with peer hospitals before your next negotiation.
What a review covers