Capital Blue Cross
Last updated: March 2026
Capital Blue Cross is a regional (Pennsylvania) health insurer, part of the Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) family. They report 12K insurance plans covering 45K providers across 51K billing codes.
Data Version
Price Transparency Machine-Readable Files Snapshot
Overview
12K
Plans
XX% vs prev45K
Providers (NPIs)
44K
Tax IDs
51K
Billing Codes
710K
Data Rows
XX% vs prevGeographic Coverage
Top states by provider count:
Data Breakdown
Plans Type (HIOS vs EIN)
EIN | 12K |
NPIs
Individual | 41K |
Group | 4.3K |
Tax IDs
NPI (Individual) | 41K |
EIN | 3.4K |
NPI (Group) | 8 |
Billing Code Type
| Codes | Rows | |
|---|---|---|
CPT | 12K | 450K |
HCPCS | 36K | 260K |
CDT | 1.5K | 6.4K |
MS-DRG | 770 | 1.2K |
RC | 460 | 430 |
Billing Class
| Rows | |
|---|---|
Professional | 710K |
Institutional | 6.2K |
Negotiated Type
| Rows | |
|---|---|
Fee Schedule | 640K |
Negotiated | 71K |
Percentage | 1.7K |
Per Diem | 630 |
Top States by # NPIs
Pennsylvania | 39K |
New Jersey | 990 |
New York | 680 |
Maryland | 610 |
Florida | 500 |
Top Taxonomies by # NPIs
Physician Assistant | 2.8K |
Family Medicine Physician | 2.4K |
Professional Counselor | 2.3K |
Physical Therapist | 2K |
Clinical Social Worker | 1.9K |
Want to explore Capital Blue Cross's actual negotiated rates?
See code-level rates by provider, specialty, and geography.
Historical Metrics
| Month | Plans | NPIs | Tax IDs | Billing Codes | Data Rows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 2026 | 12K | 45K | 44K | 51K | 710K |
February 2026 | 24K | 45K | 44K | 51K | 3.5M |
January 2026 | — | — | — | — | |
December 2025 | — | — | — | — | |
November 2025 | — | — | — | — |
Show all 13 months
Data Coverage Scorecard
This payer scores 4/6 on data quality (Acceptable). Areas that don't meet the threshold: valid tax ids and hios plan.
Professional & Institutional Rates
Data includes both professional and institutional billing class rates
Valid Tax IDs
Less than 80% of Tax IDs are EIN or NPI (Organization) type
HIOS Plan
Data does not include any HIOS-identified plans
Low Derived/Percentage Rates
Less than 10% of negotiation entries are derived or percentage type
Standard Code Coverage
Sufficient CPT and HCPCS code coverage with low proportion of LOCAL entries
Common Taxonomies
NPIs in the dataset cover at least 50 distinct provider taxonomies
Methodology
The scorecard evaluates each payer's monthly price transparency data against six quality criteria:
If 5–6 criteria pass, the overall rating is Good.
If 3–4 criteria pass, the rating is Acceptable.
If 0–2 criteria pass, the rating is Poor.
Behavioral, RX, and other specialty networks may not pass all criteria but can still contain complete and usable data.