PayerPrice
Data Platform
Sign InTry for Free

Medica

Last updated: May 2026

Medica is a health insurer. They report 1.1K insurance plans covering 2.5M providers across 60K billing codes.

Data Version

Price Transparency Machine-Readable Files Snapshot
May 2026
Overview
1.1K

Plans

XX% vs prev
2.5M

Providers (NPIs)

XX% vs prev
660K

Tax IDs

XX% vs prev
60K

Billing Codes

XX% vs prev
2.8B

Data Rows

XX% vs prev
Geographic Coverage

Top states by provider count:

California (200K)
Texas (180K)
New York (160K)
Florida (160K)
Data Breakdown
Plans Type (HIOS vs EIN)

HIOS

65

EIN

1K

NPIs

Individual

2.2M

Group

330K

Tax IDs

EIN

520K

NPI (Individual)

140K

NPI (Group)

110

Billing Code Type
CodesRows

CPT

17K

1.9B

HCPCS

11K

790M

CDT

920

68M

MS-DRG

800

1.8M

RC

780

550K

CSTM-ALL

200

320K

LOCAL

12K

150K

ICD

17K

110K

Billing Class
Rows

Institutional

1.9B

Professional

920M

Both

530K

Negotiated Type
Rows

Negotiated

2.3B

Derived

370M

Fee Schedule

93M

Percentage

2.5M

Per Diem

690K

Top States by # NPIs

California

200K

Texas

180K

New York

160K

Florida

160K

Pennsylvania

110K

Top Taxonomies by # NPIs

Family Nurse Practitioner

150K

Clinical Social Worker

130K

Family Medicine Physician

120K

Physician Assistant

110K

Internal Medicine Physician

110K

Want to explore Medica's actual negotiated rates?

See code-level rates by provider, specialty, and geography.

Schedule a Demo
Historical Metrics
MonthPlansNPIsTax IDsBilling CodesData Rows
May 2026
1.1K2.5M660K60K2.8B
March 2026
1802.4M660K63K2.5B
February 2026
2002.4M660K63K2.9B
January 2026

December 2025

Show all 13 months

Data Coverage Scorecard
4/6 — Acceptable

This payer scores 4/6 on data quality (Acceptable). Areas that don't meet the threshold: valid tax ids and low derived/percentage rates.

Professional & Institutional Rates

Data includes both professional and institutional billing class rates

Valid Tax IDs

Less than 80% of Tax IDs are EIN or NPI (Organization) type

HIOS Plan

Data includes at least one HIOS-identified plan

Low Derived/Percentage Rates

10% or more of negotiation entries are derived or percentage type

Standard Code Coverage

Sufficient CPT and HCPCS code coverage with low proportion of LOCAL entries

Common Taxonomies

NPIs in the dataset cover at least 50 distinct provider taxonomies

Methodology

The scorecard evaluates each payer's monthly price transparency data against six quality criteria:

  • If 5–6 criteria pass, the overall rating is Good.

  • If 3–4 criteria pass, the rating is Acceptable.

  • If 0–2 criteria pass, the rating is Poor.

Behavioral, RX, and other specialty networks may not pass all criteria but can still contain complete and usable data.

PRICE TRANSPARENCY DATA

Explore Medica negotiated rates.