MagnaCare
Last updated: March 2026
MagnaCare is a health insurer. They report 1 insurance plans covering 87K providers across 25K billing codes.
Data Version
Price Transparency Machine-Readable Files Snapshot
Overview
1
Plans
87K
Providers (NPIs)
29K
Tax IDs
25K
Billing Codes
3.4M
Data Rows
Geographic Coverage
Top states by provider count:
Data Breakdown
Plans Type (HIOS vs EIN)
EIN | 1 |
NPIs
Individual | 85K |
Group | 1.9K |
Tax IDs
EIN | 15K |
NPI (Individual) | 14K |
NPI (Group) | 8 |
Billing Code Type
| Codes | Rows | |
|---|---|---|
CPT | 13K | 2.4M |
HCPCS | 5.8K | 930K |
ICD | 5.2K | 20K |
RC | 340 | 6.1K |
MS-DRG | 140 | 1.4K |
CDT | 4 | 230 |
TOB | 2 | 36 |
CSTM-ALL | 1 | 33 |
Billing Class
| Rows | |
|---|---|
Professional | 3.3M |
Institutional | 63K |
Negotiated Type
| Rows | |
|---|---|
Negotiated | 3.4M |
Percentage | 6.4K |
Per Diem | 4.2K |
Top States by # NPIs
New York | 69K |
New Jersey | 7.5K |
Pennsylvania | 2.2K |
Connecticut | 1.4K |
Florida | 1.2K |
Top Taxonomies by # NPIs
Physician Assistant | 6.2K |
Internal Medicine Physician | 5.6K |
Family Nurse Practitioner | 4.2K |
Clinical Social Worker | 3.6K |
Pediatrics Physician | 2.8K |
Want to explore MagnaCare's actual negotiated rates?
See code-level rates by provider, specialty, and geography.
Historical Metrics
| Month | Plans | NPIs | Tax IDs | Billing Codes | Data Rows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 2026 | 1 | 87K | 29K | 25K | 3.4M |
January 2026 | — | — | — | — | |
December 2025 | — | — | — | — | |
October 2025 | — | — | — | — | |
August 2025 | — | — | — | — |
Show all 7 months
Data Coverage Scorecard
This payer scores 4/6 on data quality (Acceptable). Areas that don't meet the threshold: valid tax ids and hios plan.
Professional & Institutional Rates
Data includes both professional and institutional billing class rates
Valid Tax IDs
Less than 80% of Tax IDs are EIN or NPI (Organization) type
HIOS Plan
Data does not include any HIOS-identified plans
Low Derived/Percentage Rates
Less than 10% of negotiation entries are derived or percentage type
Standard Code Coverage
Sufficient CPT and HCPCS code coverage with low proportion of LOCAL entries
Common Taxonomies
NPIs in the dataset cover at least 50 distinct provider taxonomies
Methodology
The scorecard evaluates each payer's monthly price transparency data against six quality criteria:
If 5–6 criteria pass, the overall rating is Good.
If 3–4 criteria pass, the rating is Acceptable.
If 0–2 criteria pass, the rating is Poor.
Behavioral, RX, and other specialty networks may not pass all criteria but can still contain complete and usable data.