Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (Point32Health)
Last updated: March 2026
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (Point32Health) is a health insurer. They report 290 insurance plans covering 460K providers across 17K billing codes.
Data Version
Price Transparency Machine-Readable Files Snapshot
Overview
290
Plans
XX% vs prev460K
Providers (NPIs)
XX% vs prev150K
Tax IDs
XX% vs prev17K
Billing Codes
XX% vs prev43M
Data Rows
XX% vs prevGeographic Coverage
Top states by provider count:
Data Breakdown
Plans Type (HIOS vs EIN)
HIOS | 40 |
EIN | 250 |
NPIs
Individual | 450K |
Group | 5.4K |
Tax IDs
EIN | 120K |
NPI (Individual) | 30K |
NPI (Group) | 4 |
Billing Code Type
| Codes | Rows | |
|---|---|---|
CPT | 10K | 36M |
HCPCS | 4.4K | 6.3M |
CDT | 490 | 870K |
APR-DRG | 1.3K | 110K |
MS-DRG | 770 | 8.5K |
RC | 62 | 8.1K |
Billing Class
| Rows | |
|---|---|
Professional | 43M |
Institutional | 120K |
Negotiated Type
| Rows | |
|---|---|
Fee Schedule | 43M |
Negotiated | 110K |
Percentage | 11K |
Top States by # NPIs
Massachusetts | 55K |
California | 38K |
Texas | 27K |
Florida | 23K |
New York | 23K |
Top Taxonomies by # NPIs
Clinical Social Worker | 93K |
Mental Health Counselor | 58K |
Professional Counselor | 54K |
Psychiatric/Mental Health Nurse Practitioner | 27K |
Behavior Analyst | 25K |
Want to explore Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (Point32Health)'s actual negotiated rates?
See code-level rates by provider, specialty, and geography.
Historical Metrics
| Month | Plans | NPIs | Tax IDs | Billing Codes | Data Rows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 2026 | 290 | 460K | 150K | 17K | 43M |
February 2026 | 310 | 450K | 150K | 17K | 54M |
January 2026 | — | — | — | — | |
December 2025 | — | — | — | — | |
November 2025 | — | — | — | — |
Show all 12 months
Data Coverage Scorecard
This payer scores 5/6 on data quality (Good). Areas that don't meet the threshold: valid tax ids.
Professional & Institutional Rates
Data includes both professional and institutional billing class rates
Valid Tax IDs
Less than 80% of Tax IDs are EIN or NPI (Organization) type
HIOS Plan
Data includes at least one HIOS-identified plan
Low Derived/Percentage Rates
Less than 10% of negotiation entries are derived or percentage type
Standard Code Coverage
Sufficient CPT and HCPCS code coverage with low proportion of LOCAL entries
Common Taxonomies
NPIs in the dataset cover at least 50 distinct provider taxonomies
Methodology
The scorecard evaluates each payer's monthly price transparency data against six quality criteria:
If 5–6 criteria pass, the overall rating is Good.
If 3–4 criteria pass, the rating is Acceptable.
If 0–2 criteria pass, the rating is Poor.
Behavioral, RX, and other specialty networks may not pass all criteria but can still contain complete and usable data.