Data Platform
Sign InTry for Free

Providence Health Plan

Last updated: January 2026

Price Transparency Machine-Readable Files Snapshot
January 2026
Overview
8.8K

Plans

130K

Providers (NPIs)

64K

Tax IDs

2.5K

Billing Codes

3.5M

Data Rows

Data Breakdown
Plans Type (HIOS vs EIN)

HIOS

360

EIN

8.5K

NPIs

Individual

130K

Group

2.3K

Tax IDs

EIN

51K

NPI (Individual)

13K

NPI (Group)

230

Billing Code Type
CodesRows

CPT

1.8K

3.4M

HCPCS

550

90K

RC

150

14K

ICD

1

1

Billing Class
Rows

Professional

3.3M

Institutional

270K

Negotiated Type
Rows

Fee Schedule

3.4M

Negotiated

70K

Percentage

40K

Per Diem

2.7K

Top States by # NPIs

California

17K

New York

13K

Texas

8.9K

Florida

8.5K

Colorado

6.6K

Top Taxonomies by # NPIs

Clinical Social Worker

24K

Chiropractor

16K

Professional Counselor

13K

Mental Health Counselor

12K

Behavior Analyst

12K

Monthly Metrics
MonthPlansNPIsTax IDsBilling CodesData Rows
January 2026
8.8K130K64K2.5K3.5M
Data Coverage Scorecard
4/6 — Acceptable
Professional & Institutional Rates

Data includes both professional and institutional billing class rates

Valid Tax IDs

Less than 80% of Tax IDs are EIN or NPI (Organization) type

HIOS Plan

Data includes at least one HIOS-identified plan

Low Derived/Percentage Rates

Less than 10% of negotiation entries are derived or percentage type

Standard Code Coverage

Insufficient CPT / HCPCS code coverage, or too many LOCAL entries

Common Taxonomies

NPIs in the dataset cover at least 50 distinct provider taxonomies

Methodology

The scorecard evaluates each payer's monthly price transparency data against six quality criteria:

  • If 5–6 criteria pass, the overall rating is Good.

  • If 3–4 criteria pass, the rating is Acceptable.

  • If 0–2 criteria pass, the rating is Poor.

Behavioral, RX, and other specialty networks may not pass all criteria but can still contain complete and usable data.

PRICE TRANSPARENCY DATA

Explore this payer's actual negotiated rates.