Data Platform
Sign InTry for Free

Yale Health

Last updated: February 2026

Data Version

Price Transparency Machine-Readable Files Snapshot
February 2026
Overview
1

Plans

1.5K

Providers (NPIs)

660

Tax IDs

80

Billing Codes

160

Data Rows

+100% vs prev
Data Breakdown
Plans Type (HIOS vs EIN)

EIN

1

NPIs

Individual

1.4K

Group

63

Tax IDs

EIN

660

Billing Code Type
CodesRows

CPT

68

140

HCPCS

12

24

Billing Class
Rows

Professional

130

Institutional

28

Negotiated Type
Rows

Negotiated

160

Top States by # NPIs

Connecticut

1.3K

New York

61

Massachusetts

19

Florida

16

Rhode Island

9

Top Taxonomies by # NPIs

Clinical Social Worker

410

Behavior Analyst

160

Professional Counselor

150

Psychiatric/Mental Health Nurse Practitioner

140

Marriage & Family Therapist

120

Monthly Metrics
MonthPlansNPIsTax IDsBilling CodesData Rows
February 2026
11.5K66080160
January 2026
11.5K6608080
December 2025
11.5K6608080
November 2025
11.4K6507777
October 2025
11.4K65000
Data Coverage Scorecard
4/6 — Acceptable
Professional & Institutional Rates

Data includes both professional and institutional billing class rates

Valid Tax IDs

More than 80% of Tax IDs are EIN or NPI (Organization) type

HIOS Plan

Data does not include any HIOS-identified plans

Low Derived/Percentage Rates

Less than 10% of negotiation entries are derived or percentage type

Standard Code Coverage

Insufficient CPT / HCPCS code coverage, or too many LOCAL entries

Common Taxonomies

NPIs in the dataset cover at least 50 distinct provider taxonomies

Methodology

The scorecard evaluates each payer's monthly price transparency data against six quality criteria:

  • If 5–6 criteria pass, the overall rating is Good.

  • If 3–4 criteria pass, the rating is Acceptable.

  • If 0–2 criteria pass, the rating is Poor.

Behavioral, RX, and other specialty networks may not pass all criteria but can still contain complete and usable data.

PRICE TRANSPARENCY DATA

Explore this payer's actual negotiated rates.