Inland Empire Health Plan
Last updated: March 2026
Inland Empire Health Plan is a health insurer. They report 22 insurance plans covering 700 providers across 2.1K billing codes.
Data Version
Price Transparency Machine-Readable Files Snapshot
Overview
22
Plans
700
Providers (NPIs)
860
Tax IDs
2.1K
Billing Codes
22K
Data Rows
Geographic Coverage
Top states by provider count:
Data Breakdown
Plans Type (HIOS vs EIN)
EIN | 22 |
NPIs
Group | 690 |
Individual | 8 |
Tax IDs
EIN | 860 |
Billing Code Type
| Codes | Rows | |
|---|---|---|
CPT | 1.7K | 20K |
HCPCS | 390 | 1.4K |
MS-DRG | 2 | 11 |
Billing Class
| Rows | |
|---|---|
Professional | 15K |
Institutional | 6.3K |
Negotiated Type
| Rows | |
|---|---|
Negotiated | 22K |
Percentage | 3 |
Top States by # NPIs
California | 700 |
Maryland | 1 |
Texas | 1 |
Ohio | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
Top Taxonomies by # NPIs
Specialist | 43 |
Behavior Analyst | 37 |
Physical Therapist | 36 |
Obstetrics & Gynecology Physician | 30 |
General Acute Care Hospital | 29 |
Want to explore Inland Empire Health Plan's actual negotiated rates?
See code-level rates by provider, specialty, and geography.
Historical Metrics
| Month | Plans | NPIs | Tax IDs | Billing Codes | Data Rows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 2026 | 22 | 700 | 860 | 2.1K | 22K |
June 2025 | — | — | — | — | |
May 2025 | — | — | — | — |
Data Coverage Scorecard
This payer scores 4/6 on data quality (Acceptable). Areas that don't meet the threshold: hios plan and standard code coverage.
Professional & Institutional Rates
Data includes both professional and institutional billing class rates
Valid Tax IDs
More than 80% of Tax IDs are EIN or NPI (Organization) type
HIOS Plan
Data does not include any HIOS-identified plans
Low Derived/Percentage Rates
Less than 10% of negotiation entries are derived or percentage type
Standard Code Coverage
Insufficient CPT / HCPCS code coverage, or too many LOCAL entries
Common Taxonomies
NPIs in the dataset cover at least 50 distinct provider taxonomies
Methodology
The scorecard evaluates each payer's monthly price transparency data against six quality criteria:
If 5–6 criteria pass, the overall rating is Good.
If 3–4 criteria pass, the rating is Acceptable.
If 0–2 criteria pass, the rating is Poor.
Behavioral, RX, and other specialty networks may not pass all criteria but can still contain complete and usable data.