PayerPrice
Data Platform
Sign InTry for Free

Health Alliance HAP

Last updated: March 2026

Health Alliance HAP is a health insurer. They report 5.8K insurance plans covering 2.3M providers across 62K billing codes.

Data Version

Price Transparency Machine-Readable Files Snapshot
March 2026
Overview
5.8K

Plans

XX% vs prev
2.3M

Providers (NPIs)

XX% vs prev
400K

Tax IDs

XX% vs prev
62K

Billing Codes

XX% vs prev
420M

Data Rows

XX% vs prev
Geographic Coverage

Top states by provider count:

California (180K)
New York (160K)
Texas (160K)
Florida (140K)
Data Breakdown
Plans Type (HIOS vs EIN)

HIOS

11

EIN

5.8K

NPIs

Individual

1.9M

Group

340K

Tax IDs

EIN

400K

NPI (Individual)

1

Billing Code Type
CodesRows

CPT

12K

320M

HCPCS

6.9K

88M

CDT

850

5.3M

LOCAL

19K

4.5M

MS-DRG

780

740K

RC

450

630K

ICD

20K

220K

HIPPS

1.5K

9.1K

APC

260

2.3K

CSTM-ALL

1

1.2K

Billing Class
Rows

Professional

380M

Institutional

33M

Negotiated Type
Rows

Fee Schedule

220M

Negotiated

170M

Derived

28M

Per Diem

4.6M

Percentage

890K

Top States by # NPIs

California

180K

New York

160K

Texas

160K

Florida

140K

Pennsylvania

110K

Top Taxonomies by # NPIs

Family Nurse Practitioner

130K

Clinical Social Worker

130K

Family Medicine Physician

110K

Physician Assistant

99K

Internal Medicine Physician

98K

Want to explore Health Alliance HAP's actual negotiated rates?

See code-level rates by provider, specialty, and geography.

Schedule a Demo
Historical Metrics
MonthPlansNPIsTax IDsBilling CodesData Rows
March 2026
5.8K2.3M400K62K420M
February 2026
15K2.3M420K100K2B
January 2026

December 2025

November 2025

Show all 13 months

Data Coverage Scorecard
6/6 — Good

This payer meets all 6 data quality criteria — their transparency files are comprehensive and well-structured.

Professional & Institutional Rates

Data includes both professional and institutional billing class rates

Valid Tax IDs

More than 80% of Tax IDs are EIN or NPI (Organization) type

HIOS Plan

Data includes at least one HIOS-identified plan

Low Derived/Percentage Rates

Less than 10% of negotiation entries are derived or percentage type

Standard Code Coverage

Sufficient CPT and HCPCS code coverage with low proportion of LOCAL entries

Common Taxonomies

NPIs in the dataset cover at least 50 distinct provider taxonomies

Methodology

The scorecard evaluates each payer's monthly price transparency data against six quality criteria:

  • If 5–6 criteria pass, the overall rating is Good.

  • If 3–4 criteria pass, the rating is Acceptable.

  • If 0–2 criteria pass, the rating is Poor.

Behavioral, RX, and other specialty networks may not pass all criteria but can still contain complete and usable data.

PRICE TRANSPARENCY DATA

Explore Health Alliance HAP negotiated rates.