PayerPrice
Data Platform
Sign InTry for Free

Quartz

Last updated: March 2026

Quartz is a health insurer. They report 1.9K insurance plans covering 1.9M providers across 180K billing codes.

Data Version

Price Transparency Machine-Readable Files Snapshot
March 2026
Overview
1.9K

Plans

XX% vs prev
1.9M

Providers (NPIs)

XX% vs prev
550K

Tax IDs

180K

Billing Codes

XX% vs prev
1.4B

Data Rows

XX% vs prev
Geographic Coverage

Top states by provider count:

California (150K)
Texas (140K)
New York (140K)
Florida (120K)
Data Breakdown
Plans Type (HIOS vs EIN)

HIOS

97

EIN

1.8K

NPIs

Individual

1.8M

Group

110K

Tax IDs

EIN

400K

NPI (Individual)

150K

NPI (Group)

630

Billing Code Type
CodesRows

CPT

18K

620M

LOCAL

98K

450M

HCPCS

12K

260M

CDT

960

26M

NDC

32K

4.6M

MS-DRG

800

1.2M

RC

860

1.1M

APC

720

130K

ICD

21K

92K

CSTM-ALL

1

72K

APR-DRG

340

8.9K

Billing Class
Rows

Both

610M

Institutional

430M

Professional

330M

Negotiated Type
Rows

Percentage

570M

Derived

380M

Fee Schedule

330M

Negotiated

78M

Per Diem

220K

Top States by # NPIs

California

150K

Texas

140K

New York

140K

Florida

120K

Pennsylvania

93K

Top Taxonomies by # NPIs

Family Nurse Practitioner

130K

Physician Assistant

100K

Family Medicine Physician

95K

Internal Medicine Physician

90K

Clinical Social Worker

80K

Want to explore Quartz's actual negotiated rates?

See code-level rates by provider, specialty, and geography.

Schedule a Demo
Historical Metrics
MonthPlansNPIsTax IDsBilling CodesData Rows
March 2026
1.9K1.9M550K180K1.4B
February 2026
2.6K1.9M550K180K2.5B
January 2026

December 2025

November 2025

Show all 12 months

Data Coverage Scorecard
3/6 — Acceptable

This payer scores 3/6 on data quality (Acceptable). 3 criteria did not meet the threshold.

Professional & Institutional Rates

Data includes both professional and institutional billing class rates

Valid Tax IDs

Less than 80% of Tax IDs are EIN or NPI (Organization) type

HIOS Plan

Data includes at least one HIOS-identified plan

Low Derived/Percentage Rates

10% or more of negotiation entries are derived or percentage type

Standard Code Coverage

Insufficient CPT / HCPCS code coverage, or too many LOCAL entries

Common Taxonomies

NPIs in the dataset cover at least 50 distinct provider taxonomies

Methodology

The scorecard evaluates each payer's monthly price transparency data against six quality criteria:

  • If 5–6 criteria pass, the overall rating is Good.

  • If 3–4 criteria pass, the rating is Acceptable.

  • If 0–2 criteria pass, the rating is Poor.

Behavioral, RX, and other specialty networks may not pass all criteria but can still contain complete and usable data.

PRICE TRANSPARENCY DATA

Explore Quartz negotiated rates.