PayerPrice
Data Platform
Sign InTry for Free

MedCost

Last updated: March 2026

MedCost is a health insurer. They report 310 insurance plans covering 2.1M providers across 86K billing codes.

Data Version

Price Transparency Machine-Readable Files Snapshot
March 2026
Overview
310

Plans

XX% vs prev
2.1M

Providers (NPIs)

510K

Tax IDs

XX% vs prev
86K

Billing Codes

XX% vs prev
1.5B

Data Rows

XX% vs prev
Geographic Coverage

Top states by provider count:

California (160K)
New York (160K)
Texas (150K)
Florida (140K)
Data Breakdown
Plans Type (HIOS vs EIN)

EIN

310

NPIs

Individual

2M

Group

150K

Tax IDs

EIN

450K

NPI (Individual)

54K

NPI (Group)

640

Billing Code Type
CodesRows

CPT

18K

1B

HCPCS

45K

430M

CDT

1.7K

40M

MS-DRG

890

23M

RC

500

1.3M

LOCAL

12K

150K

APC

670

120K

CSTM-ALL

1

92K

ICD

7.2K

34K

TOB

2

36

Billing Class
Rows

Institutional

1.1B

Professional

350M

Both

69M

Negotiated Type
Rows

Negotiated

1.1B

Fee Schedule

380M

Percentage

53M

Per Diem

390K

Derived

140K

Top States by # NPIs

California

160K

New York

160K

Texas

150K

Florida

140K

Pennsylvania

100K

Top Taxonomies by # NPIs

Family Nurse Practitioner

140K

Clinical Social Worker

110K

Physician Assistant

100K

Family Medicine Physician

100K

Internal Medicine Physician

94K

Want to explore MedCost's actual negotiated rates?

See code-level rates by provider, specialty, and geography.

Schedule a Demo
Historical Metrics
MonthPlansNPIsTax IDsBilling CodesData Rows
March 2026
3102.1M510K86K1.5B
February 2026
4602.2M500K50K12B
January 2026

December 2025

November 2025

Show all 9 months

Data Coverage Scorecard
5/6 — Good

This payer scores 5/6 on data quality (Good). Areas that don't meet the threshold: hios plan.

Professional & Institutional Rates

Data includes both professional and institutional billing class rates

Valid Tax IDs

More than 80% of Tax IDs are EIN or NPI (Organization) type

HIOS Plan

Data does not include any HIOS-identified plans

Low Derived/Percentage Rates

Less than 10% of negotiation entries are derived or percentage type

Standard Code Coverage

Sufficient CPT and HCPCS code coverage with low proportion of LOCAL entries

Common Taxonomies

NPIs in the dataset cover at least 50 distinct provider taxonomies

Methodology

The scorecard evaluates each payer's monthly price transparency data against six quality criteria:

  • If 5–6 criteria pass, the overall rating is Good.

  • If 3–4 criteria pass, the rating is Acceptable.

  • If 0–2 criteria pass, the rating is Poor.

Behavioral, RX, and other specialty networks may not pass all criteria but can still contain complete and usable data.

PRICE TRANSPARENCY DATA

Explore MedCost negotiated rates.