PayerPrice
Data Platform
Sign InTry for Free

MedCost

Last updated: May 2026

MedCost is a health insurer. They report 310 insurance plans covering 2.2M providers across 49K billing codes.

Data Version

Price Transparency Machine-Readable Files Snapshot
May 2026
Overview
310

Plans

XX% vs prev
2.2M

Providers (NPIs)

XX% vs prev
510K

Tax IDs

XX% vs prev
49K

Billing Codes

XX% vs prev
2.5B

Data Rows

XX% vs prev
Geographic Coverage

Top states by provider count:

California (170K)
New York (160K)
Texas (150K)
Florida (140K)
Data Breakdown
Plans Type (HIOS vs EIN)

EIN

310

NPIs

Individual

2M

Group

160K

Tax IDs

EIN

460K

NPI (Individual)

57K

NPI (Group)

680

Billing Code Type
CodesRows

CPT

16K

1.8B

HCPCS

11K

730M

CDT

990

42M

MS-DRG

890

1.2M

RC

520

250K

APC

800

170K

LOCAL

12K

150K

CSTM-ALL

2

100K

ICD

6.4K

34K

TOB

2

36

Billing Class
Rows

Institutional

1.3B

Professional

1.2B

Both

58M

Negotiated Type
Rows

Negotiated

1.3B

Fee Schedule

850M

Percentage

210M

Derived

150M

Per Diem

12M

Top States by # NPIs

California

170K

New York

160K

Texas

150K

Florida

140K

Pennsylvania

100K

Top Taxonomies by # NPIs

Family Nurse Practitioner

140K

Clinical Social Worker

120K

Physician Assistant

110K

Family Medicine Physician

100K

Internal Medicine Physician

95K

Want to explore MedCost's actual negotiated rates?

See code-level rates by provider, specialty, and geography.

Schedule a Demo
Historical Metrics
MonthPlansNPIsTax IDsBilling CodesData Rows
May 2026
3102.2M510K49K2.5B
April 2026
3102.2M500K85K2.6B
March 2026
3102.1M510K86K1.5B
February 2026

January 2026

Show all 11 months

Data Coverage Scorecard
4/6 — Acceptable

This payer scores 4/6 on data quality (Acceptable). Areas that don't meet the threshold: hios plan and low derived/percentage rates.

Professional & Institutional Rates

Data includes both professional and institutional billing class rates

Valid Tax IDs

More than 80% of Tax IDs are EIN or NPI (Organization) type

HIOS Plan

Data does not include any HIOS-identified plans

Low Derived/Percentage Rates

10% or more of negotiation entries are derived or percentage type

Standard Code Coverage

Sufficient CPT and HCPCS code coverage with low proportion of LOCAL entries

Common Taxonomies

NPIs in the dataset cover at least 50 distinct provider taxonomies

Methodology

The scorecard evaluates each payer's monthly price transparency data against six quality criteria:

  • If 5–6 criteria pass, the overall rating is Good.

  • If 3–4 criteria pass, the rating is Acceptable.

  • If 0–2 criteria pass, the rating is Poor.

Behavioral, RX, and other specialty networks may not pass all criteria but can still contain complete and usable data.

PRICE TRANSPARENCY DATA

Explore MedCost negotiated rates.