MVP Health Care
Last updated: May 2026
MVP Health Care is a health insurer. They report 790 insurance plans covering 90K providers across 25K billing codes.
Data Version
Price Transparency Machine-Readable Files Snapshot
Overview
790
Plans
XX% vs prev90K
Providers (NPIs)
31K
Tax IDs
25K
Billing Codes
XX% vs prev110M
Data Rows
Geographic Coverage
Top states by provider count:
Data Breakdown
Plans Type (HIOS vs EIN)
HIOS | 370 |
EIN | 420 |
NPIs
Individual | 88K |
Group | 1.9K |
Tax IDs
EIN | 17K |
NPI (Individual) | 14K |
NPI (Group) | 8 |
Billing Code Type
| Codes | Rows | |
|---|---|---|
CPT | 15K | 94M |
HCPCS | 9K | 13M |
CDT | 910 | 420K |
RC | 130 | 9K |
Billing Class
| Rows | |
|---|---|
Professional | 100M |
Institutional | 2.5M |
Negotiated Type
| Rows | |
|---|---|
Fee Schedule | 81M |
Negotiated | 23M |
Percentage | 2.6M |
Per Diem | 170K |
Top States by # NPIs
New York | 71K |
New Jersey | 7.4K |
Pennsylvania | 2.2K |
Connecticut | 1.4K |
Florida | 1.1K |
Top Taxonomies by # NPIs
Physician Assistant | 6.1K |
Internal Medicine Physician | 5.8K |
Family Nurse Practitioner | 4.1K |
Clinical Social Worker | 3.8K |
Family Medicine Physician | 2.9K |
Want to explore MVP Health Care's actual negotiated rates?
See code-level rates by provider, specialty, and geography.
Historical Metrics
| Month | Plans | NPIs | Tax IDs | Billing Codes | Data Rows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 2026 | 790 | 90K | 31K | 25K | 110M |
April 2026 | 770 | 90K | 31K | 31K | 110M |
March 2026 | 770 | 90K | 31K | 31K | 110M |
February 2026 | — | — | — | — | |
January 2026 | — | — | — | — |
Show all 13 months
Data Coverage Scorecard
This payer scores 5/6 on data quality (Good). Areas that don't meet the threshold: valid tax ids.
Professional & Institutional Rates
Data includes both professional and institutional billing class rates
Valid Tax IDs
Less than 80% of Tax IDs are EIN or NPI (Organization) type
HIOS Plan
Data includes at least one HIOS-identified plan
Low Derived/Percentage Rates
Less than 10% of negotiation entries are derived or percentage type
Standard Code Coverage
Sufficient CPT and HCPCS code coverage with low proportion of LOCAL entries
Common Taxonomies
NPIs in the dataset cover at least 50 distinct provider taxonomies
Methodology
The scorecard evaluates each payer's monthly price transparency data against six quality criteria:
If 5–6 criteria pass, the overall rating is Good.
If 3–4 criteria pass, the rating is Acceptable.
If 0–2 criteria pass, the rating is Poor.
Behavioral, RX, and other specialty networks may not pass all criteria but can still contain complete and usable data.