Data Platform
Sign InTry for Free

Sharp Health Plan

Last updated: February 2026

Data Version

Price Transparency Machine-Readable Files Snapshot
February 2026
Overview
2

Plans

580

Providers (NPIs)

+1% vs prev
220

Tax IDs

+1% vs prev
13K

Billing Codes

3.3M

Data Rows

-33% vs prev
Data Breakdown
Plans Type (HIOS vs EIN)

EIN

2

NPIs

Individual

470

Group

100

Tax IDs

EIN

220

Billing Code Type
CodesRows

CPT

9.5K

2.4M

HCPCS

2.9K

750K

CDT

820

150K

Billing Class
Rows

Professional

3.3M

Negotiated Type
Rows

Negotiated

3.3M

Top States by # NPIs

California

560

Arizona

2

Pennsylvania

1

Hawaii

1

Ohio

1

Top Taxonomies by # NPIs

Nephrology Physician

47

Neurology Physician

28

Physician Assistant

26

Hematology & Oncology Physician

25

Skilled Nursing Facility

22

Monthly Metrics
MonthPlansNPIsTax IDsBilling CodesData Rows
February 2026
258022013K3.3M
January 2026
257022013K4.9M
December 2025
358023013K4.9M
November 2025
10000
October 2025
356022000
Data Coverage Scorecard
4/6 — Acceptable
Professional & Institutional Rates

Data is missing professional and/or institutional billing class rates

Valid Tax IDs

More than 80% of Tax IDs are EIN or NPI (Organization) type

HIOS Plan

Data does not include any HIOS-identified plans

Low Derived/Percentage Rates

Less than 10% of negotiation entries are derived or percentage type

Standard Code Coverage

Sufficient CPT and HCPCS code coverage with low proportion of LOCAL entries

Common Taxonomies

NPIs in the dataset cover at least 50 distinct provider taxonomies

Methodology

The scorecard evaluates each payer's monthly price transparency data against six quality criteria:

  • If 5–6 criteria pass, the overall rating is Good.

  • If 3–4 criteria pass, the rating is Acceptable.

  • If 0–2 criteria pass, the rating is Poor.

Behavioral, RX, and other specialty networks may not pass all criteria but can still contain complete and usable data.

PRICE TRANSPARENCY DATA

Explore this payer's actual negotiated rates.