Sharp Health Plan
Last updated: March 2026
Sharp Health Plan is a health insurer. They report 3 insurance plans covering 580 providers across 13K billing codes.
Data Version
Price Transparency Machine-Readable Files Snapshot
Overview
3
Plans
XX% vs prev580
Providers (NPIs)
XX% vs prev230
Tax IDs
XX% vs prev13K
Billing Codes
3.4M
Data Rows
XX% vs prevGeographic Coverage
Top states by provider count:
Data Breakdown
Plans Type (HIOS vs EIN)
EIN | 3 |
NPIs
Individual | 480 |
Group | 110 |
Tax IDs
EIN | 230 |
Billing Code Type
| Codes | Rows | |
|---|---|---|
CPT | 9.5K | 2.5M |
HCPCS | 2.9K | 780K |
CDT | 820 | 150K |
Billing Class
| Rows | |
|---|---|
Professional | 3.4M |
Negotiated Type
| Rows | |
|---|---|
Negotiated | 3.4M |
Top States by # NPIs
California | 570 |
Arizona | 2 |
Georgia | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
Massachusetts | 1 |
Top Taxonomies by # NPIs
Nephrology Physician | 47 |
Neurology Physician | 28 |
Physician Assistant | 28 |
Hematology & Oncology Physician | 25 |
Skilled Nursing Facility | 22 |
Want to explore Sharp Health Plan's actual negotiated rates?
See code-level rates by provider, specialty, and geography.
Historical Metrics
| Month | Plans | NPIs | Tax IDs | Billing Codes | Data Rows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 2026 | 3 | 580 | 230 | 13K | 3.4M |
February 2026 | 2 | 580 | 220 | 13K | 3.3M |
January 2026 | — | — | — | — | |
December 2025 | — | — | — | — | |
October 2025 | — | — | — | — |
Show all 9 months
Data Coverage Scorecard
This payer scores 4/6 on data quality (Acceptable). Areas that don't meet the threshold: professional & institutional rates and hios plan.
Professional & Institutional Rates
Data is missing professional and/or institutional billing class rates
Valid Tax IDs
More than 80% of Tax IDs are EIN or NPI (Organization) type
HIOS Plan
Data does not include any HIOS-identified plans
Low Derived/Percentage Rates
Less than 10% of negotiation entries are derived or percentage type
Standard Code Coverage
Sufficient CPT and HCPCS code coverage with low proportion of LOCAL entries
Common Taxonomies
NPIs in the dataset cover at least 50 distinct provider taxonomies
Methodology
The scorecard evaluates each payer's monthly price transparency data against six quality criteria:
If 5–6 criteria pass, the overall rating is Good.
If 3–4 criteria pass, the rating is Acceptable.
If 0–2 criteria pass, the rating is Poor.
Behavioral, RX, and other specialty networks may not pass all criteria but can still contain complete and usable data.